scholarly journals COMPARISION OF CEMENTED VERSUS UNCEMENTED HEMIARTHOROPLASTY OF THE HIP.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (07) ◽  
pp. 1057-1061
Author(s):  
Dr. Hafiz Salman Saeed ◽  
Farhad Alam ◽  
Muhammad Yousaf ◽  
Iqra Fayyaz
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Orthopaedic Department ◽  
Residual Pain ◽  
Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

The objective of this study was to compare the mean residual pain after cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of hip. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Orthopaedic Department, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. Period: September 2016 to October 2017. Materials and Methods: Total 150 patients were admitted in orthopedic Department of Allied Hospital Faisalabad according to inclusion & exclusion criteria. After taking informed written consent, all patients were divided into two groups randomly. Cementedhemiarthroplasty was done in Group A patients and uncemented hemiarthroplasty was done in group B patient. All procedures were done by surgeon who has minimum 5yrs post fellowship experience. Monthly Follow up was done and residual pain was noticed at the end of 6th month. All the data was analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0. Results: In this study, in Group-A the patients between 65-75 years of age were 57.33% (n=43) and between 76-85 of age were 42.67% (n=32). In Group B the patients between 65-75 years of age were 56%(n=42) and between 76-85 years were 44% (n=33). The mean+sd was calculated and it is 73.49+4.99 years in Group-A patients and 73.73+4.74 years in Group-B patients. In Group A, males were 61.33% (n=46) and female were 38.67% (n=29). In Group B, males were 57.33% (n=43) and female were 42.67% (n=32). When we compared the residual pain after cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip, it shows 1.69+0.35 in Group-A patients and 2.62+0.30 in Group-B patients. When we calculated p-value it was 0.0001 showing a significantdifference. Conclusion: It is concluded that residual pain in cemented hemiarthroplasty is lower than uncemented hemiarthroplasty. 

scholarly journals LOWER URETERIC STONES EXPULSION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (09) ◽  
pp. 1331-1335
Author(s):  
Khalid Hussain ◽  
Maria Tarique ◽  
Attiq ur Rehman Khan ◽  
Asim Bukhari ◽  
Bilal Akhter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objectives: To compare Tamsulosin versus ESWL for lower ureteric stonesexpulsion. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient Department ofUrology at Services Hospital, Lahore. Period: January 2015 to December 2015. Material& Methods: Total 50 patients were enrolled in study. Patients were divided into 2 groups.In group A, 25 patients received daily oral treatment of 0.4mg Tamsulosin for 28 days, andin group B, 25 patients were treated with ESWL. A stone-free condition, was defined as thecomplete absence of any stone based on plain abdominal X-rays observed and during followupvisits at the time of treatment of stone was noted. Results: The mean age of the patientswere recorded as 33.20±9.23 years. There were 40(80%) males and 10(20%) females with maleto female ratio of 4:1. Out of 50 patients, 16(32%) presented with hematuria, 3(6%) had feverwhile 31(62%) appeared with no complication status. Out of 50 patients, 21(42%) presentedwith expulsion time 08-14 days in which 14(28%) were from tamsulosin group and 07(14%)were from ESWL group, similarly 19(38%) patients appeared with expulsion time of 15-28 daysin which 10(20%) were from tamsulosin group and 09(18%) were from ESWL group. Statisticallythere is insignificant difference between the groups i.e. p-value=0.28 Ns. Conclusion: Thisstudy suggests that the tamsulosin helps in the earlier clearance of stone fragments andreduces the complications as compared to ESWL.

Comparison of letrozole and clomiphene citrate efficacy in terms of ovulation induction and pregnancy rate.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 749-754
Author(s):  
Nadia Sharif ◽  
Uzma Manzoor ◽  
Saadia Bano ◽  
Uzma Shahzaad
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Letrozole and clomiphene citrate in Patients of Anovulation polycystic ovarian syndrome with Infertility. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Independent Medical College Faisalabad. Period: 30-09-2019 to 29-6-2020. Material & Methods: This study included 100 patients with 50 patients in each group. Group A received 2.5 to 5mg letrozole in each cycle from day 3 to 7. Group B received clomiphene citrate 50 to 100 mg incremental dose depending on ovarian response. Both Drugs were given for consecutive 3 to 6 cycles to see response. Main outcome Measure included optimal follicle size (> 18mm), endometrial thickness, and pregnancy rate. Epidemiological data and efficacy outcome measures were recorded on a Performa. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 13. Chi-square test applied and p-value <o.o5 was considered significant. Both group included primary infertility patients. Results: The mean age of patients was 28.03+ 3.02 years. Mean age of group A patients was 29.04+3.44 and 28.47+3.90 group B patients. Mono ovulation in group A patients (88.9%) and 27 in group b patients (60.0%). The mean endometrial thickness was 9.6mm + 1.6 in letrozole group and 6.9mm + 1.2 in clomiphene citrate group A. In group A 18% got pregnant from Letrozole group and 1.1% from the group B. Conclusion: Efficacy was significantly higher in group A Patients received letrozole as compared to patients echo received clomiphene citrate. The effects of Letrozole showed better outcome in terms of Ovulation Induction Endometrial Thickness and Pregnancy rate.

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (07) ◽  
pp. 1197-1202
Author(s):  
Hajra Shuja ◽  
Mehmood Ali Shah ◽  
Sadaf Bokhari
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard treatment for cholelithiasis. It is a safe and effective treatment in many cases. General anesthesia has a high incidence for PONV. But anti-emetic drugs can help in preventing PONV. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of ondansetron and metoclopramide in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: 6 months i.e. from 15-2-2017 to 15-8-2017. Material & Methods: The patients were divided into two groups. Ondansetron was given to group A patients within 15 minutes of induction, and metoclopramide to group B patients within 15 minutes of induction. Then patients were shifted to the ward after surgery and followed-up for 24 hours for assessment of PONV. All the data was entered and analyzed on SPSS version 20. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 38.40±12.07 years and in group B was 42.63±11.77 years. The efficacy achieved in 53 were from group A and 39 were from group B Statistically significant difference was found between the study groups i.e. p-value=0.003. Conclusion: Ondansetron showed significantly better efficacy than metoclopramide in preventing PONV after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

Outcome of Partial Nail Avulsion Followed by Matricectomy Either With Phenol (80-88%) or With Electro Cautery for Toenails

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2043-2045
Author(s):  
Tahir Hamid ◽  
Muhammad Rizwan Qadir ◽  
Ahmad Raza Nsar ◽  
Rizwan Saleem ◽  
Abdur Rehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Complications ◽  
Purulent Discharge ◽  
P Value ◽  
Serous Discharge ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B ◽  
Ingrown Toenails

Aim: To compare partial nail avulsion followed by matricectomy either with phenol (80-88%) or with electro cautery for Stage 2 & 3 ingrown toenails for early and late postoperative complications. Methods: This study was conducted at department of surgery Nawaz Sharif social security teaching hospital Lahore for one year from 01-01-2018 to 31-12-2018. One hundred patients full filling inclusion criteria were included in the study and divided into two equal groups A and B. Partial nail avulsion done in both groups followed by chemical matricectomy with phenol (80-88%) in group A and patients in group B matricectomy done with electrocautry. Results: The mean age in group A is 19.7± 8.08 years and in group B is 20.20± 6.9 years, both groups comparable p-value (0.74).In early post-operative complications in group A 17(34%) patients and 14(28%) patients in group B experienced mild pain p-value is (0.66). 6(12%) of group A patients and 6(12%) of group B patients experienced moderate pain p-value (01). 1(2%) of group A patient and 2(4%) of group B patients experienced severe pain p-value (01). 02(4%) patients of group A and 02(4%) patients of group B had serous discharge p-value(01). 1(2%) of group B patients have purulent discharge, however, no patients in group A patients have purulent discharge p-value (01). 1(2%) patients of group A and 2(4%) patients of group B had recurrence at three months follow up p-value (01). 2(4%) patients of group A and 4(8%) patients of group B had recurrence at six months follow up p-value (0.68). Conclusion: Partial nail avulsion followed by matricectomy either with Phenol 80-88% or with electrocautry are comparable in early and late complications. Keywords: Ingrown toenails, partial matricectomy

Incomplete miscarriage during the first trimester: a comparison of indoor versus outdoor procedure

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-239
Author(s):  
Faiza Iqbal ◽  
Sadia Azmat ◽  
Rabia Jamshaid ◽  
Zunaira Arshad ◽  
Anum Saqib
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vacuum Aspiration ◽  
Manual Vacuum Aspiration ◽  
Group A ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Incomplete Miscarriage

Introduction: Miscarriage is defined as the natural death of a fetus inside the uterus. To remove complete conception material after a miscarriage, vacuum aspiration or dilatation & curettage are methods to remove uterine contents. Controversies exist regarding both procedures. So we conducted this study to confirm the more successful method. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of manual vacuum aspiration versus traditional evacuation and curettage (E & C) among females presenting with incomplete miscarriage during the first trimester of pregnancy Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was done at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Shalamar Hospital, Lahore for 6 months. Then the selected females were divided randomly into 2 equal groups. In group A, females had manual vacuum procedure while in group B, females had evacuation & curettage under general anesthesia. After 12 hours of the procedure, ultrasonography was done to confirm complete evacuation. Results: The mean age of the patients was 29.87 ± 6.71 years, the mean gestational age was 8.06 ± 2.82 weeks. The effectiveness was noted in 248 (91.85%) patients. Statistically, manual vacuum showed significantly more effective as compared to evacuation & curettage procedure in the management of incomplete miscarriage i.e. p-value = 0.008. Conclusion: It has been proved that manual vacuum aspiration is more effective than traditional evacuation & curettage in the management of incomplete miscarriage.

To Compare the Mean Decrease in Respiratory Distress Assessment Score after Nebulization With Salbutamol Vs Epinephrine in Children With Acute Bronchiolitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1834-1835
Author(s):  
Faheem Ullah ◽  
Syed Sajid Munir ◽  
Maimoona Saeed
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Acute Bronchiolitis ◽  
Group 13 ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Aim: To compare the mean decrease in respiratory distress assessment score after nebulization with salbutamol vs epinephrine in children with acute bronchiolitis. Study Settings: Department of Pediatrics, Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar. Study design & duration: Randomized Controlled Trial for six months from 13/6/2018 to 13/12/2018. Methodology: In this study, 105 patients in each group were studied. Baseline RDAI score was calculated. All the patients were randomly divided in two groups. Children in group A were Nebulized with Epinephrine (0.1 ml/kg) while children in group B were with salbutamol nebulization (5mg/ml solution) ½ml+3ml normal saline repeated every hour. All children were reassessed at the end of 4th dose (4th hour) and RDAI were recalculated for all patients. Results: In age of 2-12 months, 63% infants have nebulization with epinephrine and 70% cases with salbutamol while in age group 13-18 months, 37% cases nebulized with epinephrine and 30% infants with salbutamol. Mean±SD was 10.57±4.22 and 11.63±3.14 months respectively. Regarding sex, 60% males were nebulized with epinephrine and 53.3% with salbutamol while 40% females were nebulized with epinephrine and 46.7% cases with salbutamol. Mean RDAI at baseline was calculated as 11.57+2.21 with epinephrine and 11.3+2.14 with salbutamol and P value was 0.3695. Conclusion: Mean reduction in RDAI with epinephrine nebulization is more as compared to nebulization with salbutamol in children of acute bronchiolitis. Keywords: RDAI, nebulization, salbutamol, epinephrine, acute Bronchiolitis

scholarly journals Comparative study of midline versus paramedian approach of spinal block in elderly.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1664-1667
Author(s):  
Nadia Bano ◽  
Nazim Hayat ◽  
Saira Saleem ◽  
Ayesha Rehman ◽  
Farhan Javed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Midline Approach ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Method Group ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the efficacy of paramedian and midline approach for spinal block in elderly, in terms of success rate and number of attempts required by either approach. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Madina Teaching Hospital Faisalabad. Period: January 2018 to December 2019. Material & Method: 120 elderly ASA I-III patients scheduled to undergo lower abdominal or limbs; general or orthopaedic surgery were randomly divided into two equal groups A and B of sixty patients. Patients were assigned into groups by lottery method. Group A patients were supposed to receive spinal block by midline approach while group B patients were planned to receive spinal block by paramedian approach. Results: It was observed that success rate was significantly high in group B, 98.3% as compared to group A, 80%, (p value 0.001). The number of attempts were significantly less in group B in comparison to group A (p-value 0.0001). Conclusion: The paramedian approach for spinal block in elderly patient’s offers ease of administration and a higher success rate as compared to midline approach.

scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of intramyometrial versus intramuscular prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) in the management of primary postpartum hemorrhage due to uterine atony.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1656-1663
Author(s):  
Saira Kanwal ◽  
Aisha Javed ◽  
Sidra Saba ◽  
Afifa Batool Gillani
Keyword(s):  
Intervention Study ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Prostaglandin F2α ◽  
Uterine Atony ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Ruptured Uterus

Objective: To determine the better route of prostaglandin F2α either intramyometrial or intramuscular for the management of uterine atony and to prevent surgical intervention. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Settings: Bahawal Victoria Hospital. Period: Feb 2018 to July 2018. Material & Method: A total of 266 patients with primary PPH due to uterine atony of 20 to 39 years of age were enrolled in the study. Patients of primary PPH due to bleeding disorders, ruptured uterus, on anticoagulant therapy and hypersensitivity to prostaglandin were excluded. Patients were divided randomly into two groups i.e. Group A (for intramyometrial injection) & Group B (for intramuscular injection). Outcome variables like arrest of bleeding within 30 minutes after start of treatment (efficacy) were noted for successful or unsuccessful outcome. Results: The mean age of women in group A was 26.94 ± 4.43 and in group B was 26.21 ± 4.09 years (p=0.005). The mean parity in group A was 2.92 ± 0.87 and in group B was 2.93 ± 0.98 (p=0.8579). Efficacy was 82.71% in group A (Intramyometrial group) and 91.73% in group B (Intramuscular group) with p-value of 0.0276. Conclusion: This study concluded that intramuscular prostaglandin F2α has better efficacy i.e. 91.73% in a patient of uterine atony for management of primary PPH as compared to intramyometrial rout of administration for prostaglandin F2α.

scholarly journals Comparison of Salbutamol and Salbutamol with ipratropium bromide in children with exacerbation of Asthma in terms of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1611-1615
Author(s):  
Sadaf Minhas ◽  
Saqib Aslam ◽  
Muhammad Azhar Farooq ◽  
Ayesha Anwar ◽  
Farhan Zahoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peak Expiratory Flow ◽  
Ipratropium Bromide ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Expiratory Flow ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objective: To compare the Salbutamol alone and Ipratropium Bromide supplemented Salbutamol in children with exacerbation of asthma in terms of PEFR. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial. Setting: Pediatrics Emergency, KRL Hospital Islamabad. Period: 1st August 2016 to 31 January 2017. Material & Methods: Group A patients were given only Salbutamol (0.15mg/kg per dose with minimum 2.5 mg, maximum 5 mg/dose). Group B was given Ipratropium Bromide supplemented Salbutamol (250 mcg/dose for <20 kg while 500 mcg/dose for >20kg of Ipratropium Bromide with same dose of Salbutamol as prescribed for Group A). Baseline spirometry was performed on each patient and after measurement of baseline peak expiratory flow. The outcome was measured by Peak flow meter and reassessed at 60 minutes. Results: Comparison of salbutamol alone and ipratropium bromide supplemented salbutamol in children with exacerbation of asthma in terms of PEFR shows that 40.5 + 4.28 in Group-A and 59.5 +4.75 in Group-B, P-value was calculated as 0.0001, showing a significant difference between the two groups while the difference in increase was recorded as 19%. Conclusion: We concluded that salbutamol alone is significantly less effective when compared with Ipratropium Bromide supplemented Salbutamol in children with exacerbation of asthma in terms of PEFR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document