scholarly journals The role of the civil society institutions to create and implement the socio-economic development strategy of Russia’s constituent entities (exemplified by the Saratov Region)

Author(s):  
Galina Komkova ◽  
Svetlana Kulikova ◽  
Elena Berdnikova ◽  
Elena Abaeva
2008 ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Senchagov

The core of Russia’s long-term socio-economic development strategy is represented by its conceptual basis. Having considered debating points about the essence and priority of the strategy, the author analyzes the logic and stages of its development as well as possibilities, restrictions and risks of high GDP rates of growth.


Federalism ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
E. M. Bukhvald ◽  
A. V. Kol`chugina

Strategizing the spatial development of the Russian Federation is an extremely complex, multifaceted task, which affects not only the traditional problem of the location of productive forces, but also a wide range of issues, concerning the ratio of different types of settlements, agglomeration processes, strengthening the role of each type of settlements and agglomerations in ensuring sustainable socio-economic development of the country and its regions. The active discussion around the dilemma “mega-cities and/or small and medium-sized cities”, which actively unfolded during the discussion of the draft of the spatial development Strategy, naturally didn’t lead to the formation of a mono polar position on this issue. Formally, newly adopted document paid tribute to the leading role of mega cities and large agglomerations in the development of the country’s economy and its modernization on the innovative basis, but also proceeds from the fact that the implementation of this trend of socio-economic development should not lead to the launch of the bulk of small settlements. This situation gives the reason to presume that many questions of the spatial development of the Russian economy haven’t yet received an adequate answer. This, in particular, concerns the settlement aspect of spatial Strategy. In addition, it is not clear what should be the program-target tools of the Spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation and what role national projects can play in this sphere.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
pp. 60-83
Author(s):  
Yurii RADIONOV ◽  

The article substantiates the need for the formation and implementation of the socio-economic development strategy of the country as a basis for sustainable and dynamic development. International and domestic experience, formation and approval of the strategy are analyzed. Based on the study and analysis of the situation, the author proposed a mechanism for determining the priorities of the strategy, the application of criteria of relevance and feasibility as a basis for setting priorities. Relevance criteria are divided into critical, important and desirable, where a critical priority is the event that must be carried out at a certain time despite the necessary resources; an important priority is one that has a positive effect on efficiency, but is determined by the resource limit, and a desirable priority is one that can have a positive effect on efficiency, but resources and deadlines depend on their availability after the implementation of other measures. The implementation criterion is divided into political, technical and financial. Political implementation involves the support of the government and the parliament in the adoption of relevant laws, regulations and more. The technical implementation of the strategy is based on the appropriate infrastructure, potential, complexity, timing, as well as the sequence of implementation of certain activities. The financial criterion is based on financial needs, capital and other expenditures, the need to increase efficiency or mobilize additional financial resources. The need to prepare an operational plan, which should be holistic, clear, specific, flexible, clear, controlled, easy to manage and interrelated with the budget, is justified. The operational plan should encourage executors to act without confusion or misinterpretation of what should be done, how and when.


Author(s):  
Yevhen Kachan ◽  
Andrii Kotsur

The article outlines the main factors of the formation and implementation of regional policy at the micro-region level in order to ensure the proper economic capacity of the territorial community. In the conditions of decentralization, the local self-government bodies are almost independent and fully responsible for the state of socio-economic development of communities. The main factors that should be taken into account in the development of socio-economic regional policy at the level of the united territorial communities are the following: the state of the regional labor market development; the state of use of internal regional factors for the development of productive forces; the state of the road infrastructure; social needs of the region population. It is necessary to implement the regional policy of the united territorial communities for the sake of solving complex problems on the basis of the development strategy of this community, in particular with a view of ensuring the financial autonomy and economic capacity. In the developing of the socio-economic development strategy of the microregion, the main principles should be: focusing on the needs and interests of people living in the microregion; longterm vision of the territory development; a comprehensive and holistic approach of solving current problems; grounding on a comprehensive analysis of the status of local regional development; active and effective public participation. The key components of the socio-economic development strategy of the micro-region should be: assessment of its resource potential; analysis of the demographic situation in the microregion; analysis of labor potential and its employment; modern state of micro-region economic development; study of the state infrastructure available to it; a generalized analysis of the socio-economic situation in the microregion and challenges in the future; priority directions of microregion development; regional micro-region development programs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd Hannan

Madura is well-known as an island which has been identical to the values of religion. One of the values is the important role of religious institutions, such as pesantren. The role of pesantren as a traditional Islamic institution is not limited to religious areas only, but to other social aspects only, including in economic development. This study examines the economic development of pesantren through analyzing santripreneur based on local wisdom in Pamekasan, Madura, East Java, Indonesia. This study outlines descriptive-narrative explanations regarding the value of Madurese local wisdom, and creative economic santripreneur activities in the pesantren, such as batik crafts, pesantren supermarket, and sharia-based pesantren (ikhtisab) as an economic development strategy in the pesantren of Miftahul Ulum, Pamekasan. Moreover, it offers the idea of pesantren economic development in Madura, especially in the context of strengthening the economic independency and sustainability. Keywords: Madura, santri, entrepreneurship, local wisdom  


2022 ◽  
pp. 72-89
Author(s):  
B. N. Porfiriev ◽  
A. A. Shirov ◽  
A. Y. Kolpakov ◽  
E. A. Edinak

The climate agenda involves significant economic dimension and component. This is precipitated, on the one hand, by the climate change impact on the economy and its implications for economic development that necessitate costs for planning and implementing adaptation measures, and, on the other hand, by the imperatives of structural and technological modernization of the economy to strengthen its competitiveness and sustainability of socio-economic development including reduction of industrial greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and increasing the ecosystems’ carbon sink capacity. The above implies harmonization of ecological, climatic, socio-economic, and technological characteristics to produce an effective national low GHG emissions socio-economic development strategy required by the Paris Climate Agreement. This in turn calls for comprehensive assessment of the impact produced by new low-carbon technologies on economic dynamics using the framework of macrostructural calculations and scenarios of economic development of Russia with different volumes of funding invested in decarbonization. It is argued that the most efficient is a group of so-called moderate scenarios that provide for both GHG reduction and economic growth rates above the global average. More ambitious scenarios involve risks of slowing GDP growth given weighty additional investment which constrains the dynamics of household consumption. The key role of the Russian ecosystems capacity to absorb and sequester carbon in implementation of the low GHG emissions socio-economic development strategy is substantiated and the imperative for the complex of measures to improve the efficiency of land use and forestry resources (LULUCF), primarily the quality of R&D and the national monitoring system development, is emphasized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document