Emotional experiences in digitally mediated and in-person interactions: An experience-sampling study
As the ubiquity of digitally mediated communication grows, so does the number of questions about the costs and benefits of replacing in-person interactions with digital ones. In the present study, we used a daily diary design to examine how people’s emotional experiences vary across in-person, video-, phone-, and text-mediated interactions in day-to-day life. We hypothesized that individuals would report less positive affect and more negative affect after less life-like interactions (where in-person is defined as the most life-like and text-mediated as the least life- like). In line with this hypothesis, the analysis of 527 unique interactions reveals that people feel lonelier, sadder, less connected, less supported, and less happy following digitally mediated compared to in-person interactions. Additional analyses show that the links between communication mode and momentary experiences are independent of properties of individual interactions such as interaction length and overall quality of the interaction. These findings provide initial evidence that there may be inherent properties of common digital communication tools that make connection more challenging and point to important directions for future research.