Rotational Grazing Demonstrations with Beef Cows on CRP Land in Adams County, 2001

Author(s):  
Chris Nelson ◽  
Rick Sprague ◽  
Russell Bredahl ◽  
Brian Peterson ◽  
William Bartenhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Chris O. Nelson ◽  
Rick Sprague ◽  
Russell Bredahl ◽  
Brian Peterson ◽  
William Bartenhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-928
Author(s):  
D. A. QUINTON

The nutrient content of diets consumed, using a bite count technique, and the performance of beef cows and their calves grazing spruce and pine clearcuts in the southern interior rangelands of British Columbia on continuously and rotationally grazed pasture systems were evaluated in a 3- to 5-yr study. Forage species and plant parts ingested by cows were collected by hand clipping to simulate the diet. Nutrient composition of each sample forage was determined chemically and the nutrient levels of cattle diets were estimated from the bite counts of forages consumed and the chemical composition of the clipped samples. Dietary deficiencies, based on estimates of dietary intake of cows and chemical composition of samples, were noted for protein and phosphorus during August and September (rotational grazing); sodium during September; iodine, copper and zinc throughout the grazing season with the exception of zinc in the September diet of rotationally grazed cows. Selenium was adequate to excessive in the diet. Cow diets consisted of from 50 to 72% grass, from 23 to 42% forbs and from 4 to 20% shrubs. The diversity of diet components maintained nutrient levels of the diet above those provided by grass alone. Weight gains of cows and calves were obtained at monthly intervals for 3 yr and seasonally for 5 yr. There were no significant differences in cow performance among years or between grazing treatments. Cows gained an average of 0.22 kg d−1 over a 90-d grazing period. Average daily gains of cows decreased from 0.55 kg in July to −0.21 kg in September. Calf gains were significantly different between treatments over 5 yr. Calf gains averaged 0.92 kg−1 d on the continuously grazed pastures vs. 0.83 kg d−1 on those rotationally grazed. Total beef production of saleable beef (calves) under the continuous and rotational grazing system was 72.7 kg ha−1 and 65.3 kg ha−1, respectively. Key words: Beef cattle, production, nutrition, clearcuts, daily gains


Author(s):  
Chris Nelson ◽  
Rick Sprague ◽  
Russell Bredahl ◽  
Brian Peterson
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Probo ◽  
Michele Lonati ◽  
Marco Pittarello ◽  
Derek W. Bailey ◽  
Matteo Garbarino ◽  
...  

Continuous grazing systems (CGS) are still widely used for managing cattle herds in the south-western Alps. Recently, Pastoral Plans have been used as a policy tool to improve grazing management. Rotational grazing systems (RGS) with large paddocks (i.e. ~100 ha on average) and stocking rate adjustments based on recommended levels calculated from vegetation surveys have been implemented through Pastoral Plans to improve the uniformity of grazing. A case study was conducted to compare grazing distribution patterns of beef cows during the summer under CGS and RGS on sub-alpine and alpine pastures within Val Troncea Natural Park in the south-western Alps of Italy. Cows were tracked with global positioning system collars at 15-min intervals under both CGS and RGS. Cattle distribution patterns were aggregated in both grazing systems, but in the RGS concentration of grazing was less clustered and the selection of vegetation communities was more homogeneous than in CGS. Under CGS, cows were attracted (P < 0.05) to salt placements and areas with high forage pastoral values, and they avoided (P < 0.05) steep slopes. In contrast, cows under RGS were not influenced by (P > 0.05) high pastoral value, and they avoided areas farther from water (P < 0.05). Similar to CGS, cows under RGS were attracted (P < 0.05) to salt and avoided (P < 0.05) steep slopes. In the RGS, cows used steeper slopes and areas farther from salt and water in the second half of the grazing period within a paddock compared with the first half, which likely explains the improvement in uniformity of grazing with RGS. Our findings indicate that Pastoral Plans that combine appropriate stocking levels and RGS are valid policy and management tools that have the potential to improve grazing distribution on rough sub-alpine and alpine pastures in the south-western Alps.


Author(s):  
Chris Nelson ◽  
Rick Sprague ◽  
Russell Bredahl ◽  
Brian Peterson ◽  
William Bartenhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki Ishii ◽  
Muhammad Mukhtar ◽  
Sachiko Idota ◽  
Kiichi Fukuyama

Author(s):  
Chris Nelson ◽  
Rick Sprague ◽  
Brian Peterson ◽  
William Bartenhagen ◽  
John Klein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Chris Nelson ◽  
Rick Sprague ◽  
Russell Bredahl ◽  
Brian Peterson ◽  
William Bartenhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

EDIS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose C.B. Dubeux ◽  
Nicolas DiLorenzo ◽  
Kalyn Waters ◽  
Jane C. Griffin

Florida has 915,000 beef cows and 125,000 replacement heifers (USDA, 2016). Developing these heifers so that they can become productive females in the cow herd is a tremendous investment in a cow/calf operation, an investment that takes several years to make a return. The good news is that there are options to develop heifers on forage-based programs with the possibility of reducing costs while simultaneously meeting performance targets required by the beef industry. Mild winters in Florida allows utilization of cool-season forages that can significantly enhance the performance of grazing heifers. During the warm-season, integration of forage legumes into grazing systems will provide additional nutrients to meet the performance required to develop a replacement heifer to become pregnant and enter the mature cow herd. In this document, we will propose a model for replacement heifer development, based on forage research performed in trials at the NFREC Marianna.   


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document