scholarly journals ¿Qué hacer cuando un lector sospecha de una falta ética?

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Alfredo Oyola-García
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Journal Editors

La mayoría, o casi todas, las publicaciones científicas siguen las recomendaciones del International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Este comité señala claramente que la publicación duplicada es una mala conducta científica(1,2), pero también lo puede ser la difamación pública, como lo hemos señalado en otros artículos.

scholarly journals Editorial-Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W De Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

scholarly journals Declaraciones del Comité Internacional de Directores de Revistas Médicas anexas a las normas de Vancouver

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
International Committee Of Medical Journal Editors
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Popular Media ◽  
Conflicts Of Interests ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Biomedical Journals ◽  
Dissemination Of Research ◽  
Definition Of

These statements, which are published by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in conjunction with the Vancouver standards, cover sorne of the legal, ethical, and practical aspects of the publication of research papers, and of the comments generated by them, in biomedical journals. Pollowing a definition of what constitutes a peer-reviewed journal, the roles of journal owners and editors are described, along with those of members of an editorial board, and procedural norms are set forth in connection with conflicts of interests, retractions or corrections, fraud, and breaches of confidentiality. Arnong the last topics explored are the problems involved in the dissemination of research results by the popular media, the handling of advertising within the journal, and the simultaneous acceptance of manuscripts whose authors have arrived at opposite conclusions regarding the results of a particular study.

Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 387 (10016) ◽  
pp. e9-e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren B Taichman ◽  
Joyce Backus ◽  
Christopher Baethge ◽  
Howard Bauchner ◽  
Peter W de Leeuw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Medical Journal ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Journal Editors

Authorship

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Journal ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
International Committee ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Journal Editors ◽  
Collection Data ◽  
Honorary Authorship ◽  
Definition Of

This chapter begins with a definition of authorship and provides the The Proposed Rapid Review Checklist for Authors (the 5Ds: design, data collection, data analysis, discussion of findings, the ability to define the paper and its message) which may be useful in judging whether authorship should be considered. The authorship model proposed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) is also outlined. The chapter also discusses different forms of inappropriate authorship models (ghost authorship, guest/honorary authorship, anonymous authorship) and presents intellectual property and copyright considerations. An author's responsibility to report an original, accurate, focused and repeatable account of the research conducted is also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document