Modifield Desarda Repair and Hernioplastia Lichtenstein Repair for Inguinal Hernia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Pedro Rolando Lòpez Rodrìguez ◽  
Eduardo Garcia Castillo ◽  
Olga Caridad Leòn Gonzàlez ◽  
Jorge Agustin Satorre Rocha ◽  
Luis Marrero Quiala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lichtenstein Repair ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Location Type ◽  
Mean Time

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of Modified Desarda repair no mesh and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial study of 1342 patients having 1394 hernias operated from January 2008 to December 2020. 690 patients were operated using Lichtenstein repair and 652 using Desarda repair. The demographie data (Age,Sex) , hernia type and location , anesthetic , operative time , postoperative pain and complications were analysed. Results: There were no significant differences regarding age, sex, location, type of hernia, and pain in both the groups. The operation time was 52 minutes in Modified Desarda group and 42 minutes in the Lichtenstein group that is significant (p<0.05). The recurrence was 0.0 % in Modified Desarda group and 0.28 % in Lichtenstein group. But, there were 9 cases of infection to the polypropylene mesh in the Lichtenstein group, 2 of this required re-exploration. The morbidity was also significantly more in Lichtenstein group (7,6 %) as compared to Modified Desarda group (3.8 %). The mean time to return to work in the Modified Desarda group was 8.26 days while a mean of 12.58 days was in the Lichtenstein group. The mean hospital stay was 29 hrs. in Modified Desarda group while it was 49 hours in the Lichtenstein group in those patients who were hospitalized. Conclusions: The modified Desarda repair scores significantly on Lichtenstein repair in most of all aspects, including reexplorations and morbidity. Modified Desarda repair is a better option compared to Lichtenstein repair.

scholarly journals Desarda repair no Mesh and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia (A study of 2793 patients)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Pedro Rolando Lòpez Rodrìguez ◽  
Eduardo Garcia Castillo ◽  
Olga Caridad Leòn Gonzàlez ◽  
Jorge Agustin Satorre Rocha ◽  
Luis Marrero Quiala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lichtenstein Repair ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Location Type

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of Desarda repair no mesh and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial study of 2793 patients having 2936 hernias operated from January 2002 to December 2020.1434 patients were operated using Lichtenstein repair and 1359 using Desarda repair. The variables like age, sex, location, type of hernia, tolerance to local anesthesia, duration of surgery, pain on the first, third and fifth day, hospital stay, complications, re-explorations, morbidity and time to return to normal activities were analyzed. Follow up period was from 1-10 years (median 6.5 years). Results: There were no significant differences regarding age, sex, location, type of hernia, and pain in both the groups. The operation time was 53 minutes in Desarda group and 43 minutes in the Lichtenstein group that is significant (p<0.05).The recurrence was 0.4 % in Desarda group and 0.4 % in Lichtenstein group. But, there were 14 cases of infection to the polypropylene mesh in the Lichtenstein group, 7 of this required re-exploration. The morbidity was also significantly more in Lichtenstein group (5,1 %) as compared to Desarda group (3.1 %). The mean time to return to work in the Desarda group was 8.26 days while a mean of 12.58 days was in the Lichtenstein group. The mean hospital stay was 29 hrs. In Desarda group while it was 49 hours in the Lichtenstein group in those patients who were hospitalized. Conclusions: Desarda repair scores significantly over the Lichtenstein repair in all respects including re-explorations and morbidity. Desarda repair is a better choice as compared with Lichtenstein repair.

scholarly journals Desarda Repair No Mesh and Lichtenstein Repair for Inguinal Hernia a Study of 2793 Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Lichtenstein Repair ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Location Type

Introduction: The objective of this study is to compare the outcomes of Desarda repair no mesh and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Methods: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial study of 2793 patients having 2936 hernias operated from January 2002 to December 2020.1434 patients were operated using Lichtenstein repair and 1359 using Desarda repair. The variables like age, sex, location, type of hernia, tolerance to local anesthesia, duration of surgery, pain on the first, third and fifth day, hospital stay, complications, re-explorations, morbidity and time to return to normal activities were analyzed. Follow up period was from 1-10 years (median 6.5 years). Results: There were no significant differences regarding age, sex, location, type of hernia, and pain in both the groups. The operation time was 53 minutes in Desarda group and 43 minutes in the Lichtenstein group that is significant (p<0.05). The recurrence was 0.4 % in Desarda group and 0.4 % in Lichtenstein group. But, there were 14 cases of infection to the polypropylene mesh in the Lichtenstein group, 7 of this required re-exploration. The morbidity was also significantly more in Lichtenstein group (5,1 %) as compared to Desarda group (3.1 %). The mean time to return to work in the Desarda group was 8.26 days while a mean of 12.58 days was in the Lichtenstein group. The mean hospital stay was 29 hrs. In Desarda group while it was 49 hours in the Lichtenstein group in those patients who were hospitalized. Conclusions: Desarda repair scores significantly over the Lichtenstein repair in all respects including re-explorations and morbidity. Desarda repair is a better choice as compared with Lichtenstein repair

scholarly journals Effects of ketamine and ketamine with midazolam on emergence agitation in children following sevoflurane anesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-65
Author(s):  
Achyut Sharma ◽  
Resham Bahadur Rana
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pediatric Anesthesia ◽  
Sevoflurane Anesthesia ◽  
Emergence Agitation ◽  
Ophthalmic Surgery ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Recovery Times ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Mean Time

Background : Emergence agitation is a distressful phenomenon associated with inhalational agents such as Sevoflurane in short surgical procedures. Various drugs have been used in the past but some come at the cost of increased complications. We aim to study the effects of ketamine alone and ketamine with midazolam on emergence agitation and their effects on recovery and discharge times.Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial among 94 patients aged two to ten years presenting for ophthalmic surgeries in which 45 patients were allocated to each group: group K (Ketamine) and group KM (Ketamine with Midazolam). Group K received Ketamine 0.3 mg/kg IV and Group KM received Ketamine 0.3 mg/kg IV and Midazolam 0.03 mg/kg IV. Intraoperatively heart rate and post-operatively emergence agitation, recovery times, discharge times were studied.Results: Demographic variables were comparable between the two groups. Median Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score of 6 with IQR (4-6) in group K was comparable to the median score of 5 with IQR (4-6) in group KM. The mean recovery time of 22}4.82 min in group K was significantly lower compared to the mean time of 25.75}3.32 min in group KM. Mean time to discharge of 67}11 min from the hospital in group K was significantly shorter compared to that in group KM (108}18 mins).Conclusion: We concluded from our study that ketamine alone is as effective as ketamine with midazolam in reducing the emergence agitation following Sevoflurane anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery. Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of NepalVol. 4, No. 2, 2017, page: 57-65

scholarly journals SHOULDICE VERSUS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 355-359
Author(s):  
WASEEM SADIQ AWAN ◽  
MUHAMMAD REHMAN GULZAR ◽  
GHULAM MUSTAFA ARAIN ◽  
Raza Younus
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lichtenstein Repair ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Shouldice Repair ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Surgical Unit

Objective: To compare the results of tissue based Shouldice repair with the Lichtenstein tension free repair of inguinal hernia. Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Period: From Jan 2004 to Dec 2006. Setting: Surgical Unit-II, Allama Iqbal Medical College / Jinnah Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Patients & Methods: A total of 156 patients were included in this study were equally divided into two groups. Results: The mean age was 45 years. After a follow up of upto 2 years there was significant difference in the recurrence rate. It was 5% in the Shouldice group and 1.28 %in the Lichtenstein group. Similarly chronic pain was also much higher i.e. 5% in the Shouldice group compared to 1.28% in Lichtenstein Group. The rate of hematoma and seroma formation was the same (1.28%) in both groups, however infection was seen slightly more in Lichtenstein repair (3.84%) as compared to Shouldice repair (2.56%). Conclusion: Tension free Lichtenstein technique was found to be superior to the tissue based Shouldice repair with respect to post operative complications and recurrence.

LAPAROSCOPIC TRANS-ABDOMINAL PRE-PERITONEAL (TAPP) REPAIR FOR TREATMENT INGUINAL HERNIA DISEASE

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
Thao Nguyen Minh ◽  
Vu Pham Anh ◽  
Tri Nguyen Huu ◽  
Phu Nguyen Doan Van ◽  
Phuc Nguyen Thanh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Bilateral Hernia ◽  
Repair Method ◽  
Tapp Repair ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
Average Operative Time ◽  
The Mean

Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the commonest surgical diseases and there are many different techniques applied. The laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair allows a better view of the inguinal anatomy, evaluation of opposite side and resolve combined peritoneal diseases as well. Patient and method: The study included 60 cases with inguinal hernia that have been treated by laparoscopic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair. Method: Description, prospective follow-up. Result: The mean age was 58±18.2. 96.7% were males. The average operative time was 45.6±15.1 minutes for one side hernia, 73±25.2 minutes for bilateral hernia. 02 cases have been post-operation inguinal seroma complication (3.3%), 02 cases with hydrocele (3.3%), 01 case with abdominal seroma (1.7%). 04 cases (6.7%) opposite inguinal hernia were detected and 05 cases (8.3%) with combined diseases were resolved. Duration of post-operative stay was 3.9±1.1 days. Conclusion: TAPP is a safe and feasible procedure, allows evaluation of opposite side and resolve combined peritoneal diseases.

Kinh nghiệm qua 126 bệnh nhân phẫu thuật nội soi cắt toàn bộ dạ dày điều trị ung thư dạ dày

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Van Huong Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Linear Stapler ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End To End ◽  
Mean Time

TÓM TẮT Đặt vấn đề: Báo cáo kinh nghiệm về kỹ thuật phẫu thuật nội soi cắt toàn bộ dạ dày qua 126 bệnh nhân điều trị ung thư dạ dày tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Đa khoa Nghệ An. Đối tượng và phương pháp nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu mô tả hồi cứu, các bệnh nhân được phẫu thuật nội soi cắt toàn bộ dạ từ 2014 đến 05/2021. Kết quả: Có 126 bệnh nhân, tuổi trung bình 60,6 ± 11,1 tuổi. 15,9% ung thư 1/3 trên dạ dày và 81,7% là 1/3 giữa. Ung thư ở giai đoạn I, II, III là 19,0%, 49,2%, 31,7%. 71,4% PTNS hoàn toàn cắt TBDD và nối lưu thông tiêu hóa bằng máy cắt nối thẳng. 3,2% trường hợp có tai biến trong mổ và 2,4% có biến chứng sau mổ, không có trường hợp nào tử vong. Số hạch nạo vét được trung bình 22,06 ± 7,6 hạch, lượng máu mất trung bình là 32,14 ± 10,4 ml, thời gian phẫu thuật trung bình là 210,4 ± 34,3 phút, thời gian nằm viện trung bình là 8,3 ± 2,5 ngày và thời gian sống thêm toàn bộ sau mổ trung bình là 36,9 ± 2,25 tháng. Kết luận: PTNS cắt TBDD là kỹ thuật an toàn và hiệu quả trong điều trị UTDD, nối thực quản hỗng tràng bằng máy cắt nối thẳng không cắt thực quản và hỗng tràng trước là kỹ thuật an toàn, tiết kiệm. Từ khóa: Kỹ thuật phẫu thuật nội soi dạ dày, ung thư dạ dày. ABSTRACT EXPERIENCE IN 126 PATIENTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL GASTRECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF GASTRIC CANCER Background: The goal of this study was to report on the experience of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in 126 patients with gastric cancer Materials and Methods: Retrospective descriptive study of 126 patients who underwent LTG for gastric cancer between 2014 and May 2021. Results: Mean age 60,6 ± 11,1; gastric cancer at stage I, II, III was 19,0%, 49,2%, 31,7% respectively. 71,4% patients underwent totally LTG and functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of esophagus and jejunum. 3.2% of cases had complications during surgery and 2,4% of cases had complications after surgery. There was no postoperative deaths. The average number of dredged lymph nodes was 22.06 ± 7.6 lymph nodes. The mean blood loss was 32.14 ± 10.4 ml. The mean operative time was 210.4 ± 34.3 minutes. The mean time for beginning oral feeding was 4.4 ± 1.9 days. The mean hospital stay was 8.3 ± 2.5 days. The mean overall survival was 36.9 ± 2,25 months. Conclusions: LTG is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of gastric cancer. The technique functional end-to-end esophagojejunostomy by linear stapler without previous resection of esophagus and jejunum was safe and saving. Keywords: Technique of laparoscopic gastrectomy, gastric cancer

scholarly journals Revisiting conventional adenoidectomy using technology

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1232
Author(s):  
Kiran Gangadhar S. ◽  
Sonee Thingujam ◽  
Jayita Poduval
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Lateral View ◽  
Respiratory Pathogens ◽  
Moderate Degree ◽  
Ventilation Tubes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Group 1

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Adenoidectomy is one of the most frequently applied surgical procedures in the paediatric population, either alone or in conjunction with tonsillectomy and/or insertion of ventilation tubes. The main purpose of the adenoidectomy is to eliminate the nasopharyngeal respiratory pathogens and to remove nasal airway obstruction. Aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of conventional and endoscopic assisted curettage adenoidectomy.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> In this comparative study, 50 patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (25 patients) underwent endoscopic curettage adenoidectomy and group 2 (25 patients) underwent conventional curettage adenoidectomy. Intraoperative time, complications and postoperative pain were recorded.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> 72% in group 1 and 64% in group 2 had grade 2 adenoid hypertrophy. 68% in group 1 and 64% in group 2 had a moderate degree of obstruction in lateral view of soft tissue X-ray nasopharynx. The mean time taken for surgery in group 1 was 13.29±3.28 minutes, and in group 2,6.28±2.31 minutes. Minimal loss of blood was recorded in group 1 with less than 20 ml, whereas in group 2, the blood loss was high; 30% of patients had blood loss more than 30 ml. In group 1, the mean VAS was 3.25 and 2.55 in group 2 2.55. In group 1, 4% of patients had primary haemorrhage and in group 2, 8% of patients had primary haemorrhage. No patient had velopharyngeal dysfunction in either group.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> More operative time but less blood loss were noted in endoscopic adenoidectomy. Intraoperative visualisation of the nasopharynx in endoscopic procedures showed no significant advantage over conventional adenoidectomy.</p>

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

Patient Access to Hepatitis C Treatment After Incorporation of Pharmacists in a Hepatology Clinic

2021 ◽  
pp. 001857872110375
Author(s):  
Frank A. Fanizza ◽  
Jennifer Loucks ◽  
Angelica Berni ◽  
Meera Shah ◽  
Dennis Grauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Hcv Treatment ◽  
Clinical Pharmacists ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Group 1

Background: Modern hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment regimens yield cure rates greater than 90%. However, obtaining approval for treatment through the prior authorization (PA) process can be time consuming and require extensive documentation. Lack of experience with this complex process can delay HCV medication approval, ultimately increasing the amount of time before patients start treatment and in some cases, prevent treatment altogether. Objectives: Assess the impact of incorporating clinical pharmacists into specialty pharmacy and hepatology clinic services on medication access, patient adherence, and outcomes in patients being treated for HCV. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort exploratory study of patients seen in an academic medical center hepatology clinic who had HCV prescriptions filled between 8/1/15 and 7/31/17. Patients were categorized by whether they filled prescriptions prior to (Pre-Group) or after (Post-Group) the implementation of a pharmacist in clinic. The Post-Group was further divided according to whether the patient was seen by a pharmacist in clinic (Post-Group 2) or if the patient was not seen by the pharmacist, but had their HCV therapy evaluated by the pharmacist before seeking insurance approval (Post-Group 1). Results: The mean time from the prescription being ordered to being dispensed was longer in the Pre-Group (50.8 ± 66.5 days) compared to both Post-Groups (22.2 ± 27.8 days in Post-Group 1 vs 18.9 ± 17.7 days in Post-Group 2; P < .05). The mean time from when the prescription was ordered to when the PA was submitted was longer in the Pre-Group (41.6 ± 71.9 days) compared to both Post-Groups (6.3 ± 16 in Post-Group 1 vs 4.1 ± 9.7 in Post-Group 2; P < .05). Rates of medication adherence and sustained virologic response were similar between all groups. Conclusion: Incorporation of clinical pharmacists into a hepatology clinic significantly reduced the time patients waited to start HCV treatment. In addition to improving access to medications, implementation of the model helped to maintain excellent medication adherence and cure rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document