scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Nutrition Recommendation Systems: With Focus on Technical Aspects

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sh Abhari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Recommendation Systems ◽  
Technical Aspects

scholarly journals Recommendation Systems for Education: Systematic Review

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 1611
Author(s):  
María Cora Urdaneta-Ponte ◽  
Amaia Mendez-Zorrilla ◽  
Ibon Oleagordia-Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Hybrid Approach ◽  
Recommendation Systems ◽  
Educational Resources ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Collaborative Approach ◽  
Developmental Approach

Recommendation systems have emerged as a response to overload in terms of increased amounts of information online, which has become a problem for users regarding the time spent on their search and the amount of information retrieved by it. In the field of recommendation systems in education, the relevance of recommended educational resources will improve the student’s learning process, and hence the importance of being able to suitably and reliably ensure relevant, useful information. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the work undertaken on recommendation systems that support educational practices with a view to acquiring information related to the type of education and areas dealt with, the developmental approach used, and the elements recommended, as well as being able to detect any gaps in this area for future research work. A systematic review was carried out that included 98 articles from a total of 2937 found in main databases (IEEE, ACM, Scopus and WoS), about which it was able to be established that most are geared towards recommending educational resources for users of formal education, in which the main approaches used in recommendation systems are the collaborative approach, the content-based approach, and the hybrid approach, with a tendency to use machine learning in the last two years. Finally, possible future areas of research and development in this field are presented.

scholarly journals Mental Fatigue and Basketball Performance: A Systematic Review

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shudian Cao ◽  
Soh Kim Geok ◽  
Samsilah Roslan ◽  
He Sun ◽  
Soh Kim Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Experimental Design ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Mental Fatigue ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Design Studies ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Total Turnover ◽  
Biological State

Mental fatigue (MF) is a psycho-biological state that impairs sports-related performances. Recently, it has been proved that MF can affect basketball performance. However, a systematic overview detailing the influences of MF on basketball performance is still lacking. This study aims to investigate the effects of MF on the physical, technical, tactical, and cognitive performance of basketball. We used the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Scopes, and CKNI for articles published up to 31 May 2021. The articles included in this study were projected to test whether MF influences basketball athlete performance. Only experimental design studies were selected, and the control condition was without MF. Finally, seven articles fit the inclusion criteria. The results imply that MF impairs the technical aspects of basketball (free throws, three-point shots, and total turnover) and the players' cognitive [take-the-first (TTF) heuristics and decision-making] performance, which results in athletes not using their techniques skillfully and being unable to make practical decisions during critical points in the game. In addition to that, the influences of MF on physical and tactical performance have not been studied. Further studies should look into comprehensive research on the influences of MF on basketball performance, especially on a player's physical and tactical performance.Systematic Review Registration: [https://inplasy.com/] [INPLASY2021100017].

A systematic review: machine learning based recommendation systems for e-learning

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 2635-2664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shristi Shakya Khanal ◽  
P.W.C. Prasad ◽  
Abeer Alsadoon ◽  
Angelika Maag
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Recommendation Systems ◽  
E Learning

Extracorporeal machine perfusion of the pancreas: technical aspects and its clinical implications – a systematic review of experimental models

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kean Guan Kuan ◽  
Mau Nam Wee ◽  
Wen Yuan Chung ◽  
Rohan Kumar ◽  
Soeren Torge Mees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Machine Perfusion ◽  
Technical Aspects

Conceptual and Technical Aspects of Psychoanalytic Enactment: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-666
Author(s):  
Charlie Trelles Severo ◽  
Pricilla Braga Laskoski ◽  
Stefania Pigatto Teche ◽  
Ana Margareth Bassols ◽  
Raquel Forgiarini Saldanha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Technical Aspects

scholarly journals A systematic review of the quality of reporting of interventions in the surgical treatment of Crohn’s anal fistula: an assessment using the TIDiER and Blencowe frameworks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tyrell ◽  
E. Coates ◽  
Steven R. Brown ◽  
M. J. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anal Fistula ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Technical Aspects ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Fistula Plug ◽  
Anal Fistula Plug ◽  
Dual Extraction

Abstract Background Crohn’s anal fistula is a challenging condition, and may require multiple surgical procedures. To replicate successful procedures, these must be adequately reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to review the quality of reporting of components of surgical interventions for Crohn’s anal fistula. Methods A systematic review was conducted. It was registered with PROSPERO (CRD:42019135157). The Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for studies reporting interventions intended to close fistula in patients with Crohn’s disease, published between 1999 and August 2019. Abstracts and full texts were screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Dual extraction of data was performed to compare reporting to the TIDiER and Blencowe frameworks for reporting of interventions. Results Initial searches identified 207 unique studies; 38 full texts were screened for inclusion and 33 were included. The most common study design was retrospective cohort (17/33), and the most frequently reported interventions were anal fistula plug (n = 8) and fibrin glue (n = 6). No studies showed coverage of all domains of TIDieR. Reporting was poor among domains related to who provided an intervention, where it was provided, and how it was tailored. Reporting of domains in the Blencowe framework was poor; the majority of studies did not report the component steps of procedures or efforts to standardise them. Conclusions This study demonstrates that reporting on technical aspects of interventions for Crohn’s anal fistula is poor. Surgeons should aim to improve reporting to allow accurate reproduction of techniques both in clinical practice and in clinical trials.

scholarly journals Differences in the recommendation of laparoscopic clinical practice guidelines according to the recommendation system—Re-evaluation using GRADE

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
J. Leung ◽  
A. Ng ◽  
K. Gurusamy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Recommendation System ◽  
Recommendation Systems ◽  
Purposive Sampling

Summary Background Guidelines are essential for safe and effective treatment. They usually have multiple statements. Since the supporting information for the guidelines varies widely, the degree to which these statements are recommended also differ. We rely on recommendation systems for grading the recommendations for different statements. All recommendation systems have different grading criteria and they could potentially cause confusion and affect the quality of recommendations. Therefore, there is a need to determine the extent of variation and explore the potential reasons behind it. Methods A purposive sampling on PubMed was conducted to find four different laparoscopic guidelines using different methods to grade the recommendations. Each statement was then re-evaluated using the GRADE recommendation system. Results The guidelines used GRADE, Oxford Methodology, SIGN, and ‘bespoke’ systems. The number of statements with similar strength for the different statements as the re-evaluated strengths in the four guidelines were 24.1, 62.2, 35.8 and 50.0% respectively. Conclusion There were a wide variety of recommendation systems for laparoscopic guidelines and there were differences between the recommendations from the guidelines using GRADE, Oxford Methodology, SIGN and the ‘Bespoke’ system when re-evaluated by GRADE. A systematic review of recent laparoscopic guidelines might provide the extent and the main reasons of the problem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document