scholarly journals THE MODEL STATUS OF THE HEAD OF THE SUBJECT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (383) ◽  
pp. 178-181
Author(s):  
V. V. Naumkina

The relevance of the topic is determined that the highest official of the subject of the Russian Federation are central in the system of regional public authorities and has a significant impact on the performance of Federal state functions. The Federal structure of the Russian Federation provides for different levels of governance. The effectiveness of solving state problems depends on the quality of management in the regions. The legislation defines only the basic principles of the requirement of the organization of power in the subject of the Russian Federation. Subject of the Russian Federation can regulate the organization of management. Federal legislation provides the subjects of the Russian Federation with relative freedom in determining the system, structure, order of formation and functioning of the Executive power. The subjects of the Russian Federation are different models of governance, which determine the status of the head of the subject of the Russian Federation. The article identifies two models for realizing the principle of separation of powers in the subjects of the Russian Federation. The place of the head of the subject of the Russian Federation in the power system is considered from the position of the scope of powers. The article describes the status of the head of the subject of the Russian Federation when using different models, highlights the features of organizational models. The practical application of the management model depends on the characteristics of the territory (area, population, socio-economic situation). In contrast to the Federal model, the head of a subject of the Russian Federation in fact included in the system of Executive power regardless of the model. The article deals with discussion issues. The article highlights the main disadvantages and offers suggestions on the advantages of models.

REGIONOLOGY ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-125
Author(s):  
Lyudmila N. Lipatova

Introduction. Legislative consolidation of a right is not always implemented in practice. This can be fully attributed to the situation in the sphere of equality of people of different sexes in the economy, including the sphere of public administration. The purpose of the article is to assess the status of women in the economy of modern Russia, based on the study of official statistics, as well as the possibility of women’s participation in solving key problems of the development of society through representation in public authorities at different levels of government. Materials and Methods. The author analyzed data from Russian Federal State Statistics Service, publications of scientists involved in the study of the issue concerned, as well as materials from authoritative international organizations. The systemic approach, analysis and synthesis, the monographic method, content analysis, as well as the employed methods of economic and statistical analysis made it possible to identify the main trends in the changing status of women in the Russian labor market and public authorities at different levels of government. Results. The status of women in the Russian labor market and public authorities at the federal, regional and municipal levels has been characterized. Violation of the rights of women has been established in terms of remuneration when filling the same positions as men with equal amount of working time. It has been revealed that the representation of women in the highest bodies of state power lags behind the benchmark level of 30 %, proclaimed by the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing and supported by the Russian Federation. Discussion and Conclusion. A conclusion has been drawn that women are underrepresented in senior government positions in the Russian Federation. In the Russian labor market, violation of women's rights is manifested in lower wages, despite higher overall level of education of women. The results may prove useful when conducting research in the field of gender equality, as well as when developing and implementing measures aimed at improving the status of women in the country's economy and ensuring their right to participate in making decisions important for the society.


Author(s):  
E.V. Bolshakov ◽  
◽  
I.D. Nazarov ◽  

The subject of the research within the framework of the article is the criminal procedure institute for the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime. The legal nature of this institution is analyzed, and comments are given on the normative legal acts and judicial practice regulating the issues of detention. The theoretical basis of the research is based on the publications of the last two decades on this problem, in particular, reflecting the discussion of the process scientists S. A. Shafer, S. B. Rossinsky and A. A. Tarasov, the subject of which was the issue of the legal nature of a suspect detention in a criminal case. In the paper, the authors ask the following questions: What is the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation? From what moment does the detained person acquire the status of a suspect? Is it possible to detain a person before initiating a criminal case? The study concludes that a person acquires the actual status of a suspect from the moment of direct detention, that is, before documenting this status and, as a result, before initiating a criminal case. Amendments to the articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are proposed, and the authors` versions of the definitions of the concepts «detention of a suspect», «the moment of actual detention» and «pre-trial proceedings» are given.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 01159
Author(s):  
Anton Shamne

The article compares the Criminal Procedural Codes provisions of the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany that regulate conducting a search as an investigative act. It also provides and compares the definitions of the concept “search” and “dwelling” given in Russian and German criminal procedural legislation. The reasons for conducting the search in general and the search of dwelling are considered, similarities and differences are revealed in relation to the status of the subject who is under the search. The author characterizes the search of dwelling and gives a comparative analysis of this investigative action as well as the notion of “urgent cases” in both countries. The authors also proposed some brief recommendations for improving the norms of the Russian Federation Criminal Procedure Code.


2020 ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
A. Sh. Kamaletdinov ◽  
A. A. Ksenofontov

Manufacturing industry functioning efficiency on the territory of the Russian Federation has been analysed. Statistical data offered by the Federal Tax Service and the Federal State Statistics Service of Russia have been used for research. The object of the study is 85 subjects of the Russian Federation, the subject of the study is the type of economic activity “Manufacturing”, which operates on their territories. The methodological basis of the research were the general scientific methods of cognition. As special methods of cognition, statistical methods were chosen. The index method as a private scientific method has been used. An indicator of the effectiveness of the economic activity “Manufacturing” has been developed. The structure of tax revenues and employed population by type of economic activity in 2017 has been studied. A distribution of subjects by type of economic activity “Manufacturing” has been created.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11

The Convention on the prohibition of the development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and on their destruction (CWC) stipulates the realization of the detailed procedure for the verification of the implementation of all its provisions, including the analytical control of the presence of the prohibited substances in samples, taken during the inspections of the sites of alleged development of chemical weapons (CW). In 1992 the Laboratory for the chemical and analytical control of the Military academy of radiological, chemical and biological defence named after Marshal of the Soviet Union S.K. Timoshenko has been created, and from the very beginning it participates in the above mentioned verification programme. Since 2006 the Laboratory operates within the framework of the federal state budgetary establishment «27 Scientific Centre» of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. As a result of the successful performance in the OPCW`s (the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) Official Inter-Laboratory Proficiency Testing Programme, in 2000 the Laboratory has been awarded the status of «designated» (a type of OPCW`s accreditation). It has been certified to perform independent analysis of authentic samples, taken from the sites of international inspections and transferred off-site in accordance with the relevant provisions of the CWC. To date, the OPCW has organized 42 official OPCW Proficiency Tests for the analysis of environmental and technological samples, and two official OPCW Biomedical Proficiency Tests. In 2016, together with the accreditation for the analysis of environmental and technological samples, valid since 2000, the Laboratory of the «27 Scientific Centre» of the Ministry of DefThe Convention on the prohibition of the development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons and on their destruction (CWC) stipulates the realization of the detailed procedure for the verification of the implementation of all its provisions, including the analytical control of the presence of the prohibited substances in samples, taken during the inspections of the sites of alleged development of chemical weapons (CW). In 1992 the Laboratory for the chemical and analytical control of the Military academy of radiological, chemical and biological defence named after Marshal of the Soviet Union S.K. Timoshenko has been created, and from the very beginning it participates in the above mentioned verification programme. Since 2006 the Laboratory operates within the framework of the federal state budgetary establishment «27 Scientific Centre» of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. As a result of the successful performance in the OPCW`s (the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) Official Inter-Laboratory Proficiency Testing Programme, in 2000 the Laboratory has been awarded the status of «designated» (a type of OPCW`s accreditation). It has been certified to perform independent analysis of authentic samples, taken from the sites of international inspections and transferred off-site in accordance with the relevant provisions of the CWC. To date, the OPCW has organized 42 official OPCW Proficiency Tests for the analysis of environmental and technological samples, and two official OPCW Biomedical Proficiency Tests. In 2016, together with the accreditation for the analysis of environmental and technological samples, valid since 2000, the Laboratory of the «27 Scientific Centre» of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation has been designated for the analysis of authentic biomedical samples. During its 25 years of existence, the Laboratory has been successfully solving the problems of the analysis of composite objects during the investigations into the alleged use of chemical weapons, as well as of the analysis of samples, taken from the burial sites for abandoned chemical weapons and from the territories of their former production facilities.ence of the Russian Federation has been designated for the analysis of authentic biomedical samples. During its 25 years of existence, the Laboratory has been successfully solving the problems of the analysis of composite objects during the investigations into the alleged use of chemical weapons, as well as of the analysis of samples, taken from the burial sites for abandoned chemical weapons and from the territories of their former production facilities


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-134
Author(s):  
Tatiana Frolova

The subject. The article shows the approaches to the process of creating and realizing strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities in the Russian Federation. Thestrategies of socio-economic development of the largest cities have been fundamental inthe formation of such city agglomerations as “Big Volgograd” (Volgograd), “Big Rostov”(Rostov), Zhigulevskaya agglomeration (Samara), Nizhegorodskaya agglomeration (NizhnyNovgorod), Chelyabinsk city agglomeration (Chelyabinsk) and these strategies contain themain ways of development which go far beyond the competence of local importance.The purpose. The article addresses the problems that arise in the process of creating strategiesof socio-economic development of the largest cities including the extent of powerbetween public authorities of different levels.The methodology. The systematic approach, methods of formal and comparative analysisof law as well as synthesis are used in the article.Results. Before the adoption of Federal Law “On the Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation”(further down the article 172-FZ) strategic planning was unsystematic and therewere no unitary law-based approaches towards the drafting process of strategic planningdocuments. After the adoption of 172-FZ the situation has not dramatically changed.The analysis of strategic planning in the largest cities shows the lack of unitary approachestowards the drafting process of strategic planning documents, the definitions of missionand strategic goals of development, the assessment of largest cities importance in the contextof over-regional, regional and internal city area development. Also, the peculiarities ofterritorial planning and budgetary process in municipal establishments are not taken intoconsideration.


Author(s):  
Olga Anatolevna Fomicheva

The subject of this research is practice of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation applied in legal regulation of lawmaking process. Analysis is conducted on legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation regarding the establishment of their rights to realization of the legislative initiative. The author’s arguments on carrying out the analysis of regional legislation with regards to establishment of a circle of subjects with the right of legislative initiative are grounded on the scholars’ opinion that the status of the subject of realization of legislative initiative is special. The fact of recognition of the subject of lawmaking process as a subject of legislative initiative is a juridical fact bot only for acquisition of the right to introduction of a bill, but also guarantees for participation in lawmaking process of the parliament. Therefore, establishment of a circle of subjects with the right of legislative initiative is crucial in determination of peculiarities of the regional lawmaking process. Application of the general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, allowed arranging the circle of the subjects of lawmaking process into groups, as well as formulate a conclusion on the specificities of setting rules for the lawmaking process realized in constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The philosophical methods of cognition of legal reality allowed determining the general rules of lawmaking process, summarize the acquired data, and comprehensively examine the research materials. Having analyzed the practice of legal regulation, the author identified the flaws in terminology used in practice of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Recommendations are made to pay closer attention to ambiguity of legislation in some regions of the Russian Federation. A conclusion is formulated on the positive experience that can become an example for other constituent entities of the Russian Federation in setting rules for the lawmaking process.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Оксана Журавлева ◽  
Oksana Zhuravleva

According to the Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation, the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union is a priority for Russia. It is necessary to take into account the experience of other federal states through the integration model’s creation. Austria is a federal state like the Russian Federation. The analysis of the Austrian experience in tax regulation including the implementation of supranational regulation rules in the national legislation may help to plan successful strategies. The article is focused on the legal basis for taxation in Austria. The subject of the research is the legal principles of taxation regulation, its dynamics, system and sources of tax legislation. The author concludes that 2015/2016 tax reform will change the implementation mechanisms of principles of federalism and justice. The research identifies tendencies for strengthening the role of federal regulation in taxation, harmonization of taxation procedures, revision of the economic model of taxation of physical persons’ incomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 05032
Author(s):  
Vitaly Goncharov ◽  
Tatiana Mikhaleva ◽  
Grigory Vasilevich ◽  
Sergey Balashenko ◽  
Jacek Zalesny ◽  
...  

This article is devoted to the constitutional and legal analysis of the problems of choosing the optimal system of executive power in the Russian Federation. The paper substantiates the position that the need to optimize the system of executive power in Russia is due to a number of external and internal factors that are subjective and objective in nature. The article identifies and formulates the main problems of choosing the optimal system of executive power in Russia, defines its optimal characteristics, develops and substantiates an algorithm of actions necessary in the formation and construction of an optimal system of executive power in the country. Optimization of the system of executive power in the Russian Federation will allow to fully protect the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens of the Russian Federation; strengthen the system of public authorities in the country; create conditions for the full development of society and the state.


Constitutional (statutory) courts are among the most effective bodies to protect the rights and freedoms of citizens. As a result of constitutional (statutory) legal proceedings, not only the person who filed the complaint receives judicial protection, but also other citizens whose rights were violated or could be violated, since recognizing a normative legal act as inadequate to the constitution, such a court cancels it. In his work, the author attempts to objectively assess the level and state of constitutional justice in the regions of the Russian Federation. In view of the fact that, with the exception of justices of the peace, the constitutional (statutory) courts are the only courts of the subjects of the Russian Federation, their absence in most entities violates the principle of separation of powers that is necessary in any democratic state. In addition, constitutional (statutory) courts play an important part in protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens, including allowing them to challenge the constitutionality of a particular law of the subject, as well as, for example, the regulatory legal act of the local government. The author concludes that there is a necessity to organize such courts, analyzes the problems in the already established courts of this category, and also formulates proposals for improving constitutional justice in the subjects of the Russian Federation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document