The role of physical exercise in cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 977-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Morris ◽  
Joyce Gomes Osman ◽  
Jose Maria Tormos Muñoz ◽  
David Costa Miserachs ◽  
Alvaro Pascual Leone
2020 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 105815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Loggini ◽  
Ruth Tangonan ◽  
Faten El Ammar ◽  
Ali Mansour ◽  
Fernando D. Goldenberg ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Schultz ◽  
Robyn L. Tate

Background: Previous research addressing cognitive recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults has predominately used cross-sectional methods. This systematic review examines longitudinal research into cognitive recovery in the first 2 years following moderate-to-severe TBI in adults and aims to identify apparent methodological issues with the existing literature.Design: Systematic review of the first 2 years post-trauma.Setting: Data were extracted from three electronic databases and manual searches of published articles until October 2012.Participants: Two hundred and forty-two participants with severe TBI and 281 comparison participants were used to calculate effect sizes.Results: Twenty papers met the selection criteria, with effect sizes computed from four studies. Moderate-to-large effect sizes were initially observed between the TBI and comparison groups on most measures (range: d = 0.2–2.8). Recovery continued in all five cognitive domains over the 2 years post-injury.Conclusions: Results demonstrated that cognitive recovery was continuous throughout the first 2 years following moderate-to-severe TBI. Findings also indicated different rates of recovery for the specific cognitive domains, highlighting the heterogeneous nature of cognitive recovery after TBI. The review highlighted several methodological issues within the limited existing literature; recommendations were developed to improve the evidence base.


Brain Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1018-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Lawrence ◽  
Paul Comper ◽  
Michael G. Hutchison ◽  
Bhanu Sharma

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e041581
Author(s):  
Reema Shafi ◽  
Angela Colantonio

IntroductionReturning to work and sustaining employment can be a significant challenge for traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. Within the literature, there is recurring support for the role of workplace accommodations in effective and early return-to-work (RTW). To date, however, there has been a lack of systematic reviews exploring the specific role of workplace accommodations within the context of RTW after TBI. The primary objective of this protocol is to outline the methodological approach that will be undertaken to systematically review the literature and to assess the effectiveness of workplace accommodations in facilitating RTW.Methods and analysisA total of nine databases will be searched systematically using the concepts ‘Brain injury,’ ‘RTW’ and ‘Job Accommodations.’ Study selection will be performed independently by three reviewers, based on predetermined eligibility criteria through two rounds of screening using, first, the title and abstract, followed by a full-text search. Extracted information will include the study’s purpose, design, and setting; the data source and type; the severity of TBI and the diagnostic criterion used; a comprehensive description of the intervention provided; the RTW outcome variables and the statistical methods used, etc. The data will be tabulated and narratively synthesised. Systematic review registration: This protocol has been registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.Ethics and disseminationAs this review intends to use pre-existing published studies hence research ethics board approvals will not be required. Nevertheless, this review will follow the ethical and governance standards in the data management and presentation of results. The findings from this review will potentially be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (electronically and in print). The results of this review will be presented at both national/international conferences and shared with stakeholders influencing RTW practices.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016043517.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document