scholarly journals Robustness of the controllability for the strongly damped wave equation under the influence of impulses, delays and nonlocal conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Leiva

This work proves the following conjecture: impulses, delays, and nonlocal conditions, under some assumptions, do not destroy some posed system qualitative properties since they are themselves intrinsic to it. we verified that the property of controllability is robust under this type of disturbances for the strongly damped wave equation. Specifically, we prove that the interior approximate controllability of linear strongly damped wave equation is not destroyed if we add impulses, nonlocal conditions and a nonlinear perturbation with delay in state. This is done by using new techniques avoiding fixed point theorems employed by A.E. Bashirov et al. In this case the delay help us to prove the approximate controllability of this system by pulling back the control solution to a fixed curve in a short time interval, and from this position, we are able to reach a neighborhood of the final state in time t by using that the corresponding linear strongly damped wave equation is approximately controllable on any interval {t0,T}, 0 < t0 < T.

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanzel Larez ◽  
Hugo Leiva ◽  
Jorge Rebaza ◽  
Addison Ríos

AbstractRothe's fixed-point theorem is applied to prove the interior approximate controllability of a semilinear impulsive strongly damped wave equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions in the space


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Hugo Leiva

AbstractEvading fixed point theorems we prove the interior approximate controllability of the following semilinear strongly damped wave equation with impulses and delay in the space Z1/2 = D((−Δ)1/2)×L2(Ω),where r > 0 is the delay, Γ = (0, τ)×Ω, ∂Γ = (0, τ) × ∂Ω, Γr = [−r, 0] × Ω, (ϕ,ψ) ∈ C([−r, 0]; Z1/2), k = 1, 2, . . . , p, Ω is a bounded domain in ℝℕ(ℕ ≥ 1), ω is an open nonempty subset of , 1 ω denotes the characteristic function of the set ω, the distributed control u ∈ L2(0, τ; U), with U = L2(Ω),η,γ, are positive numbers and f , Ik ∈ C([0, τ] × ℝ × ℝ; ℝ), k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , p. Under some conditions we prove the following statement: For all open nonempty subsets Ω of the system is approximately controllable on [0,τ]. Moreover, we exhibit a sequence of controls steering the nonlinear system from an initial state (ϕ (0), ψ(0)) to an ε-neighborhood of the final state z1 at time τ > 0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document