BOREAS TGB-05 BIOGENIC SOIL EMISSIONS OF NO AND NITROUS OXIDE

Author(s):  
J. S. LEVINE ◽  
E. L. WINSTEAD
Keyword(s):  
2001 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 312-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric A. Davidson ◽  
Mercedes M.C. Bustamante ◽  
Alexandre de Siqueira Pinto

This paper reviews reports of nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) emissions from soils of the Amazon and Cerrado regions of Brazil. N2O is a stable greenhouse gas in the troposphere and participates in ozone-destroying reactions in the stratosphere, whereas NO participates in tropospheric photochemical reactions that produce ozone. Tropical forests and savannas are important sources of atmospheric N2O and NO, but rapid land use change could be affecting these soil emissions of N oxide gases. The five published estimates for annual emissions of N2O from soils of mature Amazonian forests are remarkably consistent, ranging from 1.4 to 2.4 kg N ha–1 year–1, with a mean of 2.0 kg N ha–1 year–1. Estimates of annual emissions of NO from Amazonian forests are also remarkably similar, ranging from 1.4 to 1.7 kg N ha–1 year–1, with a mean of 1.5 kg N ha–1 year–1. Although a doubling or tripling of N2O has been observed in some young (<2 years) cattle pastures relative to mature forests, most Amazonian pastures have lower emissions than the forests that they replace, indicating that forest-topasture conversion has, on balance, probably reduced regional emissions slightly (<10%). Secondary forests also have lower soil emissions than mature forests. The same patterns apply for NO emissions in Amazonia. At the only site in Cerrado where vegetation measurements have been made N2O emissions were below detection limits and NO emissions were modest (~0.4 kg N ha–1 year–1). Emissions of NO doubled after fire and increased by a factor of ten after wetting dry soil, but these pulses lasted only a few hours to days. As in Amazonian pastures, NO emissions appear to decline with pasture age. Detectable emissions of N2O have been measured in soybean and corn fields in the Cerrado region, but they are modest relative to fluxes measured in more humid tropical agricultural regions. No measurements of NO from agricultural soils in the Cerrado region have been made, but we speculate that they could be more important than N2O emissions in this relatively dry climate. While a consistent pattern is emerging from these studies in the Amazon region, far too few data exist for the Cerrado region to assess the impact of land use changes on N oxide emissions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 18-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Tullberg ◽  
Diogenes L. Antille ◽  
Chris Bluett ◽  
Jochen Eberhard ◽  
Clemens Scheer

1996 ◽  
Vol 101 (D19) ◽  
pp. 23689-23697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel S. Levine ◽  
Edward L. Winstead ◽  
Dirk A. B. Parsons ◽  
Mary C. Scholes ◽  
Robert J. Scholes ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 217-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. De Vries ◽  
J. Kros ◽  
P. J. Kuikman ◽  
G. L. Velthof ◽  
J. C. H. Voogd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Stanton ◽  
Mark Zondlo ◽  
Anthony Gomez ◽  
Da Pan
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (21) ◽  
pp. 6690-6696 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. K. Ma ◽  
R. E. Farrell ◽  
S. D. Siciliano

ABSTRACT Fungal activity is a major driver in the global nitrogen cycle, and mounting evidence suggests that fungal denitrification activity contributes significantly to soil emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). The metabolic pathway and oxygen requirement for fungal denitrification are different from those for bacterial denitrification. We hypothesized that the soil N2O emission from fungi is formate and O2 dependent and that land use and landforms could influence the proportion of N2O coming from fungi. Using substrate-induced respiration inhibition under anaerobic and aerobic conditions in combination with 15N gas analysis, we found that formate and hypoxia (versus anaerobiosis) were essential for the fungal reduction of 15N-labeled nitrate to 15N2O. As much as 65% of soil-emitted N2O was attributable to fungi; however, this was found only in soils from water-accumulating landforms. From these results, we hypothesize that plant root exudates could affect N2O production from fungi via the proposed formate-dependent pathway.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (46) ◽  
pp. e2112108118
Author(s):  
Nathaniel C. Lawrence ◽  
Carlos G. Tenesaca ◽  
Andy VanLoocke ◽  
Steven J. Hall

Agricultural landscapes are the largest source of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, but their specific sources and magnitudes remain contested. In the US Corn Belt, a globally important N2O source, in-field soil emissions were reportedly too small to account for N2O measured in the regional atmosphere, and disproportionately high N2O emissions from intermittent streams have been invoked to explain the discrepancy. We collected 3 y of high-frequency (4-h) measurements across a topographic gradient, including a very poorly drained (intermittently flooded) depression and adjacent upland soils. Mean annual N2O emissions from this corn–soybean rotation (7.8 kg of N2O–N ha−1⋅y−1) were similar to a previous regional top-down estimate, regardless of landscape position. Synthesizing other Corn Belt studies, we found mean emissions of 5.6 kg of N2O–N ha−1⋅y−1 from soils with similar drainage to our transect (moderately well-drained to very poorly drained), which collectively comprise 60% of corn–soybean-cultivated soils. In contrast, strictly well-drained soils averaged only 2.3 kg of N2O–N ha−1⋅y−1. Our results imply that in-field N2O emissions from soils with moderately to severely impaired drainage are similar to regional mean values and that N2O emissions from well-drained soils are not representative of the broader Corn Belt. On the basis of carbon dioxide equivalents, the warming effect of direct N2O emissions from our transect was twofold greater than optimistic soil carbon gains achievable from agricultural practice changes. Despite the recent focus on soil carbon sequestration, addressing N2O emissions from wet Corn Belt soils may have greater leverage in achieving climate sustainability.


2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans J. Hellebrand ◽  
Martin Strähle ◽  
Volkhard Scholz ◽  
Jürgen Kern

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document