scholarly journals The Theoretical Framework of the Clinical Pilates Exercise Method in Managing Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review

Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1096
Author(s):  
Boon Chong Kwok ◽  
Justin Xuan Li Lim ◽  
Pui Wah Kong
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Directional Preference

Exercise plays an important role in rehabilitating people with chronic low back pain. Aerobic exercise and resistance training are general exercise strategies to manage chronic low back pain, but these strategies require longer intervention period to achieve clinical outcomes in pain reduction and functional improvements. Directional preference is recognised as an important exercise strategy in managing low back pain. The Clinical Pilates exercise method leverages on the directional preference of an individual to achieve clinical outcomes faster. Clinical Pilates is a hybrid of two of the best exercise interventions for low back pain, which are general Pilates and the McKenzie method. Due to the scarcity of Clinical Pilates literature, a review of its theory and studies was undertaken to provide a structured guide to the technique in managing people with chronic low back pain. Hypothetical algorithms are developed to support translation into clinical practice and future research studies. These algorithms are useful in the management of complex cases involving multiple directional trauma. Although limited, current evidence suggests that the Clinical Pilates exercise method is safe and provides faster functional recovery in the early stage of rehabilitation and similar longer term outcomes as general exercises.

A randomized clinical trial comparing the McKenzie method and motor control exercises in people with chronic low back pain and a directional preference: 1-year follow-up

Physiotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-445
Author(s):  
Mark H. Halliday ◽  
Evangelos Pappas ◽  
Mark J. Hancock ◽  
Helen A. Clare ◽  
Rafael Z. Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Motor Control ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Directional Preference ◽  
Mckenzie Method

scholarly journals Comparative Associations of Working Memory and Pain Catastrophizing With Chronic Low Back Pain Intensity

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 1049-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey B. Simon ◽  
Trevor A. Lentz ◽  
Mark D. Bishop ◽  
Joseph L. Riley ◽  
Roger B. Fillingim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Pain Catastrophizing ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Daily Pain

Abstract Background Because of its high global burden, determining biopsychosocial influences of chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a research priority. Psychological factors such as pain catastrophizing are well established. However, cognitive factors such as working memory warrant further investigation to be clinically useful. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine how working memory and pain catastrophizing are associated with CLBP measures of daily pain intensity and movement-evoked pain intensity. Design This study was a cross-sectional analysis of individuals with ≥3 months of CLBP (n=60) compared with pain-free controls (n=30). Method Participants completed measures of working memory, pain catastrophizing, and daily pain intensity. Movement-evoked pain intensity was assessed using the Back Performance Scale. Outcome measures were compared between individuals with CLBP and those who were pain-free using nonparametric testing. Associations were determined using multivariate regression analyses. Results Participants with CLBP (mean age=47.7 years, 68% female) had lower working memory performance (P=.008) and higher pain catastrophizing (P<.001) compared with pain-free controls (mean age=47.6 years, 63% female). For individuals with CLBP, only working memory remained associated with daily pain intensity (R2=.07, standardized beta=−.308, P=.041) and movement-evoked pain intensity (R2=.14, standardized beta=−.502, P=.001) after accounting for age, sex, education, and interactions between pain catastrophizing and working memory. Limitations The cross-sectional design prevented prospective analysis. Findings also are not indicative of overall working memory (eg, spatial) or cognitive performance. Conclusion Working memory demonstrated the strongest association with daily pain and movement-evoked pain intensity compared with (and after accounting for) established CLBP factors. Future research will elucidate the prognostic value of working memory on prevention and recovery of CLBP.

scholarly journals Effects of lumbar extensor muscle strengthening and neuromuscular control retraining on disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028259
Author(s):  
Joshua Brodie Farragher ◽  
Adrian Pranata ◽  
Gavin Williams ◽  
Doa El-Ansary ◽  
Selina M Parry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Intervention Protocol ◽  
Strengthening Exercises ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding optimal management. Exercise intervention is the most widely used treatment as it likely influences contributing factors such as physical and psychological. Literature evaluating the effects of exercise on CLBP is often generalised, non-specific and employs inconsistent outcome measures. Moreover, the mechanisms behind exercise-related improvements are poorly understood. Recently, research has emerged identifying associations between neuromuscular-biomechanical impairments and CLBP-related disability. This information can be used as the basis for more specific and, potentially more efficacious exercise interventions for CLBP patients.Methods and analysisNinety-four participants (including both males and females) with CLBP aged 18–65 who present for treatment to a Melbourne-based private physiotherapy practice will be recruited and randomised into one of two treatment groups. Following baseline assessment, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either: (i) strengthening exercises in combination with lumbar force accuracy training exercises or (ii) strengthening exercises alone. Participants will attend exercise sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, with assessments conducted at baseline, midway (ie, 6 weeks into the trial) and at trial completion. All exercise interventions will be supervised by a qualified physiotherapist trained in the intervention protocol. The primary outcome will be functional disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Other psychosocial and mechanistic parameters will also be measured.Ethics and disseminationThis study was given approval by the University of Melbourne Behavioural and Social Sciences Human Ethics Sub-Committee on 8 August 2017, reference number 1 749 845. Results of the randomised controlled trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberACTRN12618000894291.

scholarly journals Pain pattern classification and directional preference are associated with clinical outcomes for patients with low back pain

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Yarznbowicz ◽  
Minjing Tao ◽  
Alexa Owens ◽  
Matt Wlodarski ◽  
Jonathan Dolutan
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Pattern Classification ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pain Pattern ◽  
Directional Preference

Body image is more negative in patients with chronic low back pain than in patients with subacute low back pain and healthy controls

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia G. Levenig ◽  
Michael Kellmann ◽  
Jens Kleinert ◽  
Johanna Belz ◽  
Tobias Hesselmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Exercise Frequency ◽  
Negative Body Image ◽  
Affective Dimensions

Abstract Background and aims Body image as an increasing research field has been integrated into pain research within the last years. However, research on cognitive-affective dimensions of body image dependent on different pain groups like acute/subacute and chronic pain patients, and healthy controls is still lacking. Therefore, this study aims to explore three dimensions of body image, namely self-acceptance, physical efficacy, and health in patients with low back pain and healthy controls. The present study is the first to distinguish between patients with low back pain in different stages of pain with regard to the concept of body image. In a second step we investigated the differences in exercise frequency between the three groups. Methods Seventy seven patients (53.2% female) suffering from low back pain and 57 healthy controls (42.1% female) filled in a battery of questionnaires in terms of body image, pain parameters and exercise frequency. Results Main results indicate first that patients suffering from chronic low back pain revealed a more negative body image in all three body image-dimensions than healthy controls. Second, patients suffering from subacute pain revealed a more negative body image of physical efficacy compared to the healthy controls. Conclusions Our results suggest that body image is relevant for the treatment of low back pain, because patients suffering from low back pain revealed a more negative body image than healthy controls. Implications To investigate the cognitive-affective dimensions of body image in different patient groups suffering from low back pain seems to be an important aspect for future research to improve therapy options and prevention of low back pain. Future research should also focus on improvements or on positive aspects of body image in patients with low back pain.

The effect of Pilates exercises on treating low back pain

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
Edyta Mikołajczyk ◽  
Kinga Żegleń
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Spine Mobility ◽  
Subjective Pain

Introduction: Back pain is now a common problem. The study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Pilates exercises on the subjective spinal pain discomfort, degree of quality-of-life impairment and the lower back mobility. Material and methods: It was conducted in a group of 30 participants with chronic low back pain in whom, before and after the twelve-week Pilates exercise interventions, the level of subjective pain tolerance (VAS scale), lumbar spine mobility and the degree of quality-of-life impairment were assessed. Results: Involvement in the Pilates exercise programme helped to reduce subjective pain complaints, improved the spinal range of motion in all planes and enhanced the quality of life in all participants. Conclusions: The Pilates method is an effective tool in treating chronic low back pain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document