scholarly journals Under-Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Remains an Issue

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 952
Author(s):  
Lucy Dumas ◽  
Rebecca Bowen ◽  
John Butler ◽  
Susana Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Older Women ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
First Line ◽  
Care Treatment ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment

Older women with ovarian cancer have disproportionately poorer survival outcomes than their younger counterparts and receive less treatment. In order to understand where the gaps lie in the treatment of older patients, studies incorporating more detailed assessment of baseline characteristics and treatment delivery beyond the scope of most cancer registries are required. We aimed to assess the proportion of women over the age of 65 who are offered and receive standard of care for first-line ovarian cancer at two UK NHS Cancer Centres over a 5-year period (December 2009 to August 2015). Standard of care treatment was defined as a combination of cytoreductive surgery and if indicated platinum-based chemotherapy (combination or single-agent). Sixty-five percent of patients aged 65 and above received standard of care treatment. Increasing age was associated with lower rates of receiving standard of care (35% > 80 years old versus 78% of 65–69-year-olds, p = 0.000). Older women were less likely to complete the planned chemotherapy course (p = 0.034). The oldest women continue to receive lower rates of standard care compared to younger women. Once adjusted for Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and first-line treatment received, age was no longer an independent risk factor for poorer overall survival. Optimisation of vulnerable patients utilising a comprehensive geriatric assessment and directed interventions to facilitate the delivery of standard of care treatment could help narrow the survival discrepancy between the oldest patients and their younger counterparts.

Use of First-Line PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Ursula Hasler-Strub
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Front Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of advanced ovarian cancer treatment. However, up to 85% of the patients experience recurrence under these settings. To fill this gap, novel front-line treatment strategies have been established, leading to unprecedented clinical benefits. For example, first-line bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent, plus chemotherapy followed by bevacizumab maintenance, has emerged as a new standard of care for newly diagnosed high risk ovarian cancer patients. This was based on the results of the phase III GOG 0218 and ICON-7 trials. More recently, poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including niraparib, olaparib and veliparib, have offered a new treatment option as part of the front-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Here we provide an overview of three recent studies that may lead to a paradigm shift in the first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

The role of 68Ga-DOTATATE for evaluation of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 217-217
Author(s):  
Mehmet Asim Bilen ◽  
Akinyemi A Akintayo ◽  
Olayinka A. Abiodun-Ojo ◽  
Omer Kucuk ◽  
Bradley Curtis Carthon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Care Treatment ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment

217 Background: Neuroendocrine transformation (NE) of prostate cancer is difficult to diagnose and treat. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET is useful to detect well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, but its application in prostate cancer is not well understood. We evaluated DOTATATE PET in patients with mCRPC and suspected or known NE. Methods: DOTATATE PET/CT were performed in 17 patients with mCRPC. Summed SUVmax of up to 5 bone and 5 soft tissue lesions in each patient were correlated with histologic presence of NE and response to standard of care treatment and clinical outcome (NCT03448458). Results: Mean age was 62.3±9.2 years. Median PSA was 39.0 ng/ml. 2/17 patients had biopsy proven NE. 1/17 was found to have squamous cell cancer and therefore excluded from analysis. 2 patients with NE had platinum-based chemotherapy. Of the 14 patients without NE, 7/14 received enzalutamide or abiraterone, and 7/14 received taxane based chemotherapy after DOTATATE PET. On PET, all patients had at least one lesion (median 7 [interquartile range 6-9]) with uptake. 11/16 patients had bone and visceral/nodal lesions, 4/16 had only bone lesions, and 1 had only nodal disease. Summed SUVmax was significantly higher in 2/16 patients with proven NE compared to the 14/16 non-NE patients (99.1± 16.5 ng/ml vs 48.4± 40.6 ng/ml; p=0.04). There was no correlation between summed SUVmax and PSA. Follow-up was available in 15/16 patients. SUVmax was higher in patients who did not respond to treatment, however, the trend was non-significant (69.5 ± 46.6 vs 39.3 ± 29.6; p=0.20). There was no significant association between survival and DOTATATE uptake. 6/16 patients had next generation sequencing. Of these, 1 patient without NE had BRCA2 mutation, and also had the highest summed uptake in this study. Conclusions: DOTATATE uptake is higher in mCRPC patients with NE or with BRCA mutation. Uptake was higher in patients who did not respond to standard of care treatment, though this was a nonsignificant trend, possibly due to small sample size. Larger studies are therefore recommended. Clinical trial information: NCT03448458.

Beneficial involvement of gynecologic oncologist in Medicare ovarian cancer patient's standard of care treatment receipt and survival.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17661-e17661
Author(s):  
Sun Hee Rim ◽  
Shawn Hirsch ◽  
Thomas B. Richards ◽  
Cheryll C. Thomas ◽  
Lauren Westervelt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Gynecologic Oncologist ◽  
Care Treatment ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment

scholarly journals A Population-Based Retrospective Study of Biliary Tract Cancers in Alberta, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 417-427
Author(s):  
Carissa Beaulieu ◽  
Arthur Lui ◽  
Dimas Yusuf ◽  
Zainab Abdelaziz ◽  
Brock Randolph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Intrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are uncommon malignancies and are underrepresented in the literature. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based review of adult patients with biopsy-confirmed BTC in Alberta from 2000 to 2015. Demographic data, risk factors, symptoms, treatment, and staging data were collected and analyzed. Survival analyses were completed. Results: A total of 1604 patients were included in our study, of which 766 (47.8%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 68 (range 19–99). There were 374 (23.3%) patients with resectable tumors at diagnosis versus 597 (37.2%) with unresectable tumors. Of the patients, 380 (21.5%) received chemotherapy (CT) and 81 (5.0%) underwent radiation therapy. There was a clear trend with worsening stage and performance status associated with shorter median overall survival (OS). Ampulla of Vater tumors had the best median OS (25.69 months), while intrahepatic bile duct cancers had the worst (5.78 months). First-line palliative CT regimens included gemcitabine+cisplatin (OS 14.98 months (mo), n = 212), single agent gemcitabine (OS 12.42 mo, n = 22), capecitabine (OS 8.12 mo, n = 8), and capecitabine+gemcitabine (OS 6.93 mo, n = 13). Patients with advanced or metastatic disease who received first-line gemcitabine+cisplatin had a median OS of 11.8 months (n = 119). Conclusion: BTCs have poor survival. Worse outcomes occur in higher stage and poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status patients across all tumor subtypes. Tumor resectability at diagnosis was associated with better OS. Our study supports the use of gemcitabine+cisplatin as a combination first-line palliative CT, as patients treated in Alberta have a comparable OS to that reported in the ABC-02 phase III study.

scholarly journals Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Chie Sato ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
Yoshitaka Kaido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Targeted Drugs ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

scholarly journals Randomised phase II trial of olaparib, chemotherapy or olaparib and cediranib in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OCTOVA): a study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e041463
Author(s):  
Anita Mansouri ◽  
Naomi McGregor ◽  
Rachel Dunn ◽  
Sam Dobbie ◽  
Jane Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Type I ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

IntroductionPatients relapsing within 12 months of platinum-based chemotherapy usually have a poorer response to subsequent treatments. To date, extensive research into the mechanism of resistance to platinum agents in the treatment of ovarian cancer has not resulted in improved responses or longer survival. Further experimental work and clinical trials with novel agents are therefore justified to address this unmet need.Patients with ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer that has relapsed within 12 months of platinum-based chemotherapy will be randomised with stratification for BReast CAncer gene (BRCA) status, prior poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) exposure and prior antiangiogenic therapy into weekly paclitaxel (chemotherapy), olaparib or the combination of cediranib and olaparib. They will be followed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. Our trial design permits two investigations. We will compare the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent olaparib with weekly paclitaxel. We will also compare the efficacy and tolerability of olaparib with the combination of olaparib and cediranib. The required sample size of 138 participants (46 per arm) was calculated using a 20% one-sided type I error, 80% power and 15% dropout rate. Recruitment will last 34 months with a follow-up of 18 months.Methods and analysisEthics and disseminationThis study will be conducted under a UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency Clinical Trials Authorisation. Approval to conduct the study was obtained from the responsible authority before beginning the study. The sponsor will retain ownership of all data arising from the trial. We aim to publish this research in a specialist peer-reviewed scientific journal on study completion. EudraCT number: 2016-000559-28, ethics reference number: 16/LO/2150.Trial registration numberISRCTN: ISRCTN14784018, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03117933; Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document