scholarly journals Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters Are Cloaked with Platelets and Correlate with Poor Prognosis in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5272
Author(s):  
Minji Lim ◽  
Suhyun Park ◽  
Hyoung-Oh Jeong ◽  
Sung Hee Park ◽  
Sumit Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Tumor Metastasis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cell ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Rapid Disease Progression ◽  
Single Ctcs

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are known to be heterogeneous and clustered with tumor-associated cells, such as macrophages, neutrophils, fibroblasts, and platelets. However, their molecular profile and clinical significance remain largely unknown. Thus, we aimed to perform a comprehensive gene expression analysis of single CTCs and CTC clusters in patients with pancreatic cancer and to identify their potential clinical relevance to provide personalized medicine. Epitope-independent, rapid (>3 mL of whole blood/min) isolation of single CTCs and CTC clusters was achieved from a prospective cohort of 16 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer using a centrifugal microfluidic device. Forty-eight mRNA expressions of individual CTCs and CTC clusters were analyzed to identify pancreatic CTC phenotype. CTC clusters had a larger proportion of mesenchymal expression than single CTCs (p = 0.0004). The presence of CTC clusters positively correlated with poor prognosis (progression-free survival, p = 0.0159; overall survival, p = 0.0186). Furthermore, we found that most CTCs in these patients (90.7%) were cloaked with platelets and found the presence of a positive correlation between the increase in CTC clusters and rapid disease progression during follow-ups. Efficient CTC cluster isolation and analysis techniques will enhance the understanding of complex tumor metastasis processes and can facilitate personalized disease management.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis

Chemotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kotone Hayuka ◽  
Hiroyuki Okuyama ◽  
Akitsu Murakami ◽  
Yoshihiro Okita ◽  
Takamasa Nishiuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

The impact of maximum tumor shrinkage of primary site (MTSP) by FOLFIRINOX in the first-line treatment of pancreatic cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 356-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Saito ◽  
Masato Ozaka ◽  
Ryo Kanata ◽  
Ikuhiro Yamada ◽  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Site ◽  
Tumor Shrinkage ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

356 Background: FOLFIRINOX is the first-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer and yielded a longer overall survival, a superior progression-free survival, a higher objective response rate compared with gemcitabine alone. Maximum tumor shrinkage of primary site (MTSP) was associated with the survival outcome in colon cancer. However the data of tumor shrinkage in pancreatic cancer has not been well-documented. Therefore, we re-evaluated FOLFIRINOX focusing on the tumor shrinkage of primary site. We also assessed impact of tumor shrinkage on survival of unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients receiving FOLFIRINOX as the first-line chemotherapy between January and December 2014. Response was evaluated by CT scan every 2 or 3 months until the end of treatment. We analyzed patients’ characteristics and rate of MTSP related to overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Thirty one patients were analyzed: median age of 62, male gender in 64.5%, performance status of 0 in 90.3%, metastatic cancer in 58.1%, the head of cancer in 41.9%, the UGT1A1 wild type in 48.4%, overall response rate in 25.8%. PFS was 7.7 months (95%CI: 6.57-9.6). Rate of MTSP were 18.8% (locally 18.8%, metastatic 18.1%) and rate of GRs/non-GRs/non-R (GRs (Good responders) were defined as patients whose MTSP were more than 20% and non-GRs (non-Good responders) were less than 20%) were 45.2%/35.5%/19.3%. PFS was 9.0(95%CI, 6.7- ) months in GRs, compared with 6.9(95%CI, 3.6-10.2) months in non-GRs (p = 0.15). Conclusions: MTSP by FOLFIRINOX could not affect PFS of pancreatic cancer.

Use of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: A multicenter real-world experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110386
Author(s):  
Angela Chen ◽  
Vincent H Ha ◽  
Sunita Ghosh ◽  
Carole R Chambers ◽  
Michael B Sawyer
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factors ◽  
Median Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stimulating Factor

Introduction The metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma clinical trial (MPACT) trial established gemcitabine (gem) and nab-paclitaxel (nab) as a standard treatment for pancreatic cancer utilizing granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to manage neutropenia. This was a challenge for jurisdictions that do not use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in palliative settings. We developed dosage guidelines to dose modify gem and nab without granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. We undertook a retrospective review to determine the efficacy and safety of these dose adjustment guidelines in the real world. Methods A multi-centered, retrospective chart review was performed on pancreatic patients between December 1, 2014, and August 21, 2018. Provincial electronic medical health records were reviewed. Using Log-rank statistics we determined the patient's progression-free survival and overall survival. Results Of 248 patients, 209 met patient selection criteria. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, on gem alone prior to nab/gem combination therapy or did not receive nab or gem. Patients who received nab/gem as first-line therapy had a median progression-free survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.1–7.4), and median overall survival of 11.1 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.8). Those who received gem/nab in the second line had a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8–6.5), and median overall survival of 19.3 months (95% CI, 12.6–26.0). Conclusions The patient’s progression-free survival and overall survival taking nab/gem using our dose modification algorithm were equivalent or superior to the MPACT trial's progression-free survival and overall survival. Gem/nab can be given by our dose modification scheme without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

scholarly journals Durable Response to Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone (BV-CHP) in a Patient with CD30-Positive PTCL Arising as a Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 5067-5072
Author(s):  
Jennifer Hong ◽  
William T. Johnson ◽  
Saritha Kartan ◽  
Anitha S. Gonsalves ◽  
Jonathan M. Fenkel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lymphoproliferative Disorder ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Trials

T-cell PTLDs are lymphoid proliferations that develop in recipients of SOT or allogeneic HSCT. They carry an extremely poor prognosis with a reported median survival of only 6 months. The infrequency with which they are encountered makes treatment a challenge due to the lack of prospective trials to guide management. The significantly higher risk of morbidity and mortality in T-cell PTLD, compared to B-cell PTLD, underscores the challenge of treating these patients and the need for new therapeutic options. Brentuximab vedotin, an ADC targeting CD30, is FDA-approved in combination with CHP as front-line treatment for patients with CD30 expressing PTCL. Herein we report a case of CD30-positive T-cell PTLD that was successfully treated with BV-CHP, suggesting the added value of the addition of BV to chemotherapy, contributing to our patient’s long and ongoing progression-free survival. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of successful treatment using BV-CHP for a CD30-positive, EBV-negative, late T-cell PTLD.

scholarly journals Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with or without Surgery in Older Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Institution Experience and Review of the Literature

2022 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 308-320
Author(s):  
Abhinav V. Reddy ◽  
Shuchi Sehgal ◽  
Colin S. Hill ◽  
Lei Zheng ◽  
Jin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Radiation Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiation ◽  
Resection Status

Objective: To report on clinical outcomes and toxicity in older (age ≥ 70 years) patients with localized pancreatic cancer treated with upfront chemotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without surgery. Methods: Endpoints included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Results: A total of 57 older patients were included in the study. Median OS was 19.6 months, with six-month, one-year, and two-year OS rates of 83.4, 66.5, and 42.4%. On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.12–0.91, p = 0.031) was associated with OS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median OS (29.1 vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). On MVA, resection status (HR: 0.40, 95% CI 0.17–0.93, p = 0.034) was also associated with PFS. Patients with surgically resected tumors had improved median PFS (12.9 vs. 1.6 months, p < 0.001). There were 3/57 cases (5.3%) of late grade 3 radiation toxicity and 2/38 cases (5.3%) of Clavien-Dindo grade 3b toxicity in those who underwent resection. Conclusion: Multimodality therapy involving SBRT is safe and feasible in older patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Surgical resection was associated with improved clinical outcomes. As such, older patients who complete chemotherapy should not be excluded from aggressive local therapy when possible.

Treatment exceeds expectations with vemurafenib monotherapy in a patient with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1754-1758
Author(s):  
Mesut Yilmaz ◽  
Şermin Güven Meşe
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Therapy Options ◽  
Modern Era ◽  
Braf Mutant

Introduction Patients with distant metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis, with a reported median survival time of six to eight months. In modern era, survival has prolonged with the immunotherapy and targeted therapy options. Potent and selective BRAF inhibitors have been developed that specifically inhibit mutated BRAF over other RAF kinases. Vemurafenib was the first selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed to target the V600E allele of BRAF-mutant melanoma. Case Report In this report, we present a case of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma, which is being treated with vemurafenib monotherapy with complete response for about seven years. Management and Outcome The patient is still being treated with vemurafenib and radiologic complete response is ongoing for about seven years. Discussion Patients treated with BRAF inhibitors monotherapy had promising response rates and improvement in the progression-free survival and overall survival, but melanoma cells became resistant very quickly, affecting the progression. In this case, we present a case that has permanent response to vemurafenib monotherapy.

scholarly journals Is there an oligometastatic state in pancreatic cancer? Practical clinical considerations raise the question

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1106) ◽  
pp. 20190627
Author(s):  
Marta Scorsetti ◽  
Tiziana Comito ◽  
Davide Franceschini ◽  
Ciro Franzese ◽  
Maria Giuseppina Prete ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clinical Considerations

Objectives: To evaluate the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a local ablative treatment (LAT) in oligometastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients affected by histologically confirmed stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this analysis. Endpoints are local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: From 2013 to 2017, a total of 41 patients were treated with SBRT on 64 metastases. Most common sites of disease were lung (29.3%) and liver (56.1%). LC at 1 and 2 years were 88.9% (95% CI 73.2–98.6) and 73.9% (95% CI 50–87.5), respectively. Median LC was 39.9 months (95% CI 23.3—not reached). PFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 21.9% (95% CI 10.8–35.4) and 10.9% (95% CI 3.4–23.4), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.1–11.3). OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 79.9% (95% CI 63.7–89.4) and 46.7% (95% CI 29.6–62.2). Median OS was 23 months (95%CI 14.1–31.8). Conclusions: Our results, although based on a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients, show that patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer may benefit from local treatment with SBRT. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results. Advances in knowledge: Selected patients affected by oligometastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma can benefit from local ablative approaches, like SBRT

scholarly journals Early Tumor Shrinkage and Depth of Response Evaluation in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with First Line Chemotherapy: An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
Lorenzo Fornaro ◽  
Carla Cappelli ◽  
Irene Pecora ◽  
Silvia Catanese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Tumor Shrinkage ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Early Tumor Shrinkage ◽  
Early Tumor

Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR) predict favorable outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer. We aim to evaluate their prognostic role in metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients treated with first-line modified-FOLFIRINOX (FOLFOXIRI) or Gemcitabine + Nab-paclitaxel (GemNab). Hence, 138 patients were tested for ETS, defined as a ≥20% reduction in the sum of target lesions’ longest diameters (SLD) after 6–8 weeks from baseline, and DoR, i.e., the maximum percentage shrinkage in the SLD from baseline. Association of ETS and DoR with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. ETS was reached in 49 patients (39.5% in the FOLFOXIRI, 29.8% in the GemNab group; p = 0.280). In the overall population, ETS was significantly associated with better PFS (8.0 vs. 4.8 months, p < 0.001) and OS (13.2 vs. 9.7 months, p = 0.001). Median DoR was −27.5% (−29.4% with FOLFOXIRI and −21.4% with GemNab, p = 0.016): DoR was significantly associated with better PFS (9.0 vs. 6.7 months, p < 0.001) and OS (14.3 vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis confirmed both ETS and DoR are independently associated with PFS and OS. In conclusion, our study added evidence on the role of ETS and DoR in the prediction of outcome of PC patients treated with first-line combination chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Hyperprogressive disease during nivolumab or irinotecan treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. e000488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Aoki ◽  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Kengo Nagashima ◽  
Hiroshi Imazeki ◽  
Takahiro Miyamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Tumour Growth ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Hyperprogressive Disease

BackgroundNivolumab showed a survival benefit for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, an acceleration of tumour growth during immunotherapy, (hyperprogressive disease, HPD) has been reported in various cancers. This study reviewed the HPD in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan.MethodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were patients with AGC with measurable lesions, and their tumour growth rates (TGR) during nivolumab or irinotecan were compared with those during prior therapy. HPD was defined as an increase in TGR more than twofold.Results34 and 66 patients received nivolumab and irinotecan in third or later line between June 2009 and September 2018 at our hospital; 22 patients receiving nivolumab had prior treatment with irinotecan, and one patient received irinotecan after nivolumab. Nivolumab and irinotecan showed no differences in disease control rates (38.2% and 34.8%) and in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.6, p=0.802). The incidence of HPD was slightly higher after nivolumab (29.4%) than after irinotecan (13.5%) (p=0.0656), showing no differences in background between the patients with and without HPD. Compared between HPD and PD other than HPD after nivolumab, the HRs for PFS and overall survival (OS) were 1.1 (95% CI 0.5 to 2.7; p=0.756), and 2.1 (95% CI 0.7 to 5.8; p=0.168), but such clear difference in OS was not observed after irinotecan.ConclusionsHPD was observed more frequently after nivolumab compared with irinotecan, which was associated with a poor prognosis after nivolumab but not so clearly after irinotecan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document