scholarly journals Stereotactic Radiation and Dual Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Blockade with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in the Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Single Institution Series

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Edy Ippolito ◽  
Sonia Silipigni ◽  
Paolo Matteucci ◽  
Carlo Greco ◽  
Francesco Pantano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Local Progression ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

(1) Background: This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of fractionated SRT (fSRT) and pertuzumab–trastuzumab (PT) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). (2) Methods: Patients with HER2+ BCBM who received FSRT from 2015 to 2019 were identified. Patients were included if they were treated with fSRT within 21 days of receiving PT. All lesions were treated with LINAC-based fSRT to a total dose of 27 Gy delivered in three consecutive fractions. All patients received concurrent PT. Patients were evaluated 4–6 weeks after SRS and subsequently every 2–3 months with MRI re-imaging (3) Results: A total of 49 patients with HER2+ brain metastases were identified. Of these patients, a total of 10 patients with 32 HER2+ BCBM were treated with concurrent SRT and PT and included in the analysis. No local progression was observed. Overall response rate was 68.7%. Only one patient developed asymptomatic radionecrosis. Median time to BM occurrence was 15.6 (range: 1–40.5 months). Distant intracranial failure occurred in 4/10 patients (40.0%). Overall BCBM median survival was 33.9 months (95%CI 24.1–43.6). Mean duration of PT treatment was 27.9 months (range: 10.1–53.7 months). (4) Conclusions: In our single institution experience, fSRT and PT showed to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with an adequate overall response rate.

CDK 4/6 inhibitors and stereotactic radiation in the management of hormone receptor positive breast cancer brain metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 583-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Figura ◽  
Thrisha K. Potluri ◽  
Homan Mohammadi ◽  
Daniel E. Oliver ◽  
John A. Arrington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Stereotactic Radiation ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastases ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring HER2 mutation: Final results from the IFCT-1703 R2D2 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9015-9015
Author(s):  
Julien Mazieres ◽  
Claire Lafitte ◽  
Charles Ricordel ◽  
Laurent Greillier ◽  
Jean-Louis Pujol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Loading Dose ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Exon 20

9015 Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2) exon 20 insertions and mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1-2% of NSCLC. However, there are no approved therapies for these patients. Many studies suggest that the use of HER2 inhibitors developed for breast cancer patients might be of interest in this setting. The aim of this trial was to prospectively evaluate the interest of a combination of two antibodies against HER2 (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) with docetaxel. Methods: IFCT-1703 R2D2 trial is a multicenter, non-randomized phase 2 study with a two-stage design, a power of 90% and an alpha risk at 5% (one-sided). HER2 mutational status was assessed locally in certified molecular genetic centers. Main other inclusion criteria were advanced NSCLC, progression after ≥ 1 platinum-based chemotherapy, asymptomatic brain metastases, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50%, and PS 0-2. Patients were treated every 3 weeks with pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg, and 420 mg thereafter; plus trastuzumab at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at 75 mg/m². Treatment was given until toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Other endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival and safety. NCT number: NCT03845270. Results: From May 2019 to October 2020, 45 patients were enrolled in 17 centers and received study treatment. Median age was 64.5 years (range 31–84), 72% females, 35% smokers, 100% non-squamous histology and 15% with ECOG PS 2. 31.1% patients had brain metastases. PD-L1 was expressed ≥ 1% and ≥ 50% in 36% and 7% of the patients, respectively. No other oncogene driver was found associated with HER2 exon 20 mutation. With a median follow-up of 12 months, 44 (98%) patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Overall response rate was 29% (n = 13), stable disease 56% (n = 26). Median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI[4.0-8.5]). Median duration of treatment in patients with confirmed response (n = 13) was 10 months (95% CI[2.7-14.9]). At the time of data cut-off, 15 patients (33%) were still under treatment. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed in 64% of patients. No patient experienced treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. One sudden death was possibly related to treatment. Most frequent grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%) and anaemia (9%). Grade 1/2 dyspnea was observed in 3 (6.7%) patients. No ILD were reported. Variation LVEF was -1.72% on average (min: -18 %; max: 10 %). Conclusions: The triplet trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel is feasible and active in HER2 pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results confirm the activity of HER2 antibodies-based strategy which should be considered in these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03845270.

Everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: A comprehensive cancer center’s experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13017-e13017
Author(s):  
Inês Moreira ◽  
Marta Ferreira ◽  
Ana Afonso ◽  
Ana Ferreira ◽  
Ana Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

e13017 Background: Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin intracellular signaling pathway is one of the mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. The addition of everolimus to exemestane improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with HR+ ABC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with HR+, HER2 negative ABC treated with everolimus/exemestane that recurred or progressed during/after treatment with NSAIs in a portuguese comprehensive cancer center. Study endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate and adverse events. Results: Between April 2014 and September 2020, 63 female patients were treated with everolimus/exemestane. Median age was 59 years (36-79), and all had performance status ECOG ≤2. Seventeen (27.0%) patients had bone metastasis alone, 39 (61.9%) had bone and visceral metastasis, 25 (39.7%) had metastasis in 3 or more sites and 87.3% had previous hormone-sensitive disease. Before everolimus/exemestane, 61 (96.8%) patients were being treated with palliative endocrine therapy (alone or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors) or chemotherapy (ChT) and 2 (3.2%) patients were under adjuvant endocrine therapy. Median follow-up time was 12.8 months (1.4-74.6), with 39 patients alive. Overall response rate was 14.3% (1 complete response and 8 partial responses) and 45 patients had stable disease. Median PFS was 5.6 months (CI95% 2.4-8.8) and median OS was 25.4 months (CI95% 10.3-40.5). Subgroup analysis regarding PFS was statistically significant for previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (p = 0.026) and for site of metastasis (p = 0.025). In the subgroup of patients that previously underwent palliative ChT, median PFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 0.2-9.6) and median OS was 18.6 months (CI95% 8.2-29.0). For patients that did not receive previous palliative ChT, median PFS was 5.8 months (CI95% 3.8-7.8) and median OS was 43.5 months (CI95% 2.0-85.0). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 21 (33.3%) patients, and were: nausea, anorexia, rash, headache, haematologic toxicity, hepatic cytolysis, hyperglycaemia, pneumonitis, oral mucositis and acute kidney failure with need for haemodialysis. Fifty-five (87.3%) patients suspended everolimus, 34 (54.0%) due to disease progression and 21 (33.3%) due to toxicity. Conclusions: Our results confirm the effectiveness and safety of everolimus/exemestane in real-world setting and support its use mainly before palliative ChT. Everolimus/exemestane in HR+ ABC is feasible in the clinic, with toxicity manageable under close surveillance.

scholarly journals Phase III, Randomized Study of Dual Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Blockade With Lapatinib Plus Trastuzumab in Combination With an Aromatase Inhibitor in Postmenopausal Women With HER2-Positive, Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: ALTERNATIVE

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 741-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen R.D. Johnston ◽  
Roberto Hegg ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
In Hae Park ◽  
Olga Burdaeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeting plus endocrine therapy (ET) improved clinical benefit in HER2-positive, hormone receptor (HR)–positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) versus ET alone. Dual HER2 blockade enhances clinical benefit versus single HER2 blockade. The ALTERNATIVE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of dual HER2 blockade plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) in postmenopausal women with HER2-positive/HR-positive MBC who received prior ET and prior neo(adjuvant)/first-line trastuzumab (TRAS) plus chemotherapy. Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive lapatinib (LAP) + TRAS + AI, TRAS + AI, or LAP + AI. Patients for whom chemotherapy was intended were excluded. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS; investigator assessed) with LAP + TRAS + AI versus TRAS + AI. Secondary end points were PFS (comparison of other arms), overall survival, overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety. Results Three hundred fifty-five patients were included in this analysis: LAP + TRAS + AI (n = 120), TRAS + AI (n = 117), and LAP + AI (n = 118). Baseline characteristics were balanced. The study met its primary end point; superior PFS was observed with LAP + TRAS + AI versus TRAS + AI (median PFS, 11 v 5.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P = .0064). Consistent PFS benefit was observed in predefined subgroups. Overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, and overall survival also favored LAP + TRAS + AI. The median PFS with LAP + AI versus TRAS + AI was 8.3 versus 5.7 months (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.98; P = .0361). Common adverse events (AEs; ≥ 15%) with LAP + TRAS + AI, TRAS + AI, and LAP + AI were diarrhea (69%, 9%, and 51%, respectively), rash (36%, 2%, and 28%, respectively), nausea (22%, 9%, and 22%, respectively), and paronychia (30%, 0%, and 15%, respectively), mostly grade 1 or 2. Serious AEs were reported similarly across the three groups, and AEs leading to discontinuation were lower with LAP + TRAS + AI. Conclusion Dual HER2 blockade with LAP + TRAS + AI showed superior PFS benefit versus TRAS + AI in patients with HER2-positive/HR-positive MBC. This combination offers an effective and safe chemotherapy-sparing alternative treatment regimen for this patient population.

Low protracted dose of temozolomide (TMZ) and concurrent radiotherapy for brain metastasis of solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12525-12525
Author(s):  
R. Addeo ◽  
V. Faiola ◽  
G. Cennamo ◽  
R. Guarrasi ◽  
L. Montella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Primary Brain Tumours ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Dna Alkyltransferase ◽  
Grade 3

12525 Background. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains the mainstay of therapy for brain metastasis of solid tumours not amenable to surgical resection. Chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) has emerged as an alterative approach for recurrent brain metastases. It has been already used alone or in combination with radiotherapy in the treatment of primary brain tumours. Protracted administration of TMZ, even at relatively low daily doses, leads to significant and prolonged depletion of enzyme O6-alkylguaninae-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT) activity, with may enhance the antitumor activity of the agent. Methods. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed breast cancer and NSCLC and inoperable brain metastasis were eligible for the study .We have treated 29 consecutive patients (16 F and 13 M, mean age: 55, range 46–76) affected by brain metastases ( 16 non-small-cell lung cancer and 13 breast cancer) with WBRT at 3 Gy/day administered over a two-week period (on wks 1–2), total dose 30 Gy, and an induction with TMZ 50 mg/m2/day during this period, following TMZ 50mg/m2 fractionated in 21 days every 28 days, for up to 12 cycles. Pts who received at least one cycle of TMZ were assessable for response. Results. Twenty-four patients were subjected to the induction therapy and 124 cycles were performed. TMZ was generally well tolerated, and the main toxicities seen were hematologic. The toxicities were generally between grade 1 or 2 in severity although two patients had grade 3 events. Two CR, in patients with breast cancer and NSCLC. Nine partial responses were recorded in 5/11 patients with breast cancer, 4/13 patients with NSCLC, while a stable disease was achieved in other 5 patients. Eight patients showed progressive BM growth during the treatment. The overall response rate was 45.5% (C.I. 38.7–56.9%), while the disease control rate was 77% (C.I. 61.7–82.4%). At the present, the overall survival at 12 months was 64%. Conclusions. We developed a new regimen based on a different strategy: the utilization of a more intensive TMZ dosing schedule that would permit the concomitant use of a second cytotoxic agent on the primary cancer. Final data analysis will be presented. The schedule was safe and well tolerated and has suggested an encouraging activity in brain metastases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long-term disease control with capecitabine in advanced breast cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12566-e12566
Author(s):  
Giovanna Masci ◽  
Emanuela Ferraro ◽  
Rosalba Torrisi ◽  
Laura Giordano ◽  
Monica Zuradelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Metastatic Setting

e12566 Background: Capecitabine is an active agent in the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). It is commonly administered at the approved dosage of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 1 week rest period. Methods: The study population included 162 pts retrospectively analyzed with ABC treated with capecitabine between 2006 and 2015 at our Institute. Capecitabine was given 14 day on,7 day off cycle at a daily dose of 1900 mg/m2, a modified schedule used to minimize side effects. The objective were overall response rate (ORR), median duration of treatment (MDT) progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results: The median age was 64 years (range 33-89). Pts with hormone receptor positive ABC were 133 (82%), 6 (4%) had HER-2 positive disease and 29 (18%) a triple negative profile. One hundred and thirty eight (85%) had already received chemotherapy in adjuvant and/or metastatic setting; anthracycline and taxanes were given in 64 pts (40%), anthracycline in 60 pts (37%) and taxane in 4 pts (2%), 9 pts (6%) received other regimens of chemotherapy. Twenty-five pts (15%) were chemo-naive. One hundred and thirty-three pts (82%) received endocrine therapy. Sixty-four pts (38%) had predominantly non-visceral metastases, 26 pts (16%) exclusive visceral involvement, 72 (44%) exhibited both characteristics. ORR was 58% (CR = 2%, PR = 16% SD = 40%) and MDT was 6.9 months. The median PFS and OS were 6.9 months and 21 months, respectively. We defined as “long responders” 19 pts (12%) with disease control interval > 24 months and, among them, as “very long responders”, 9 pts (6%) who exceeded 36 months. Efficacy was unrelated to biological profiles, sites of metastasis or previous therapies. No grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Our results show that in pts with ABC a lower dose of capecitabine has a good toxicity profile and similar overall response rate and survival data in comparison to the approved dose. In addition, we identified a subset of long and very long responders but further studies are warranted to evaluate clinical/biological predictors of a long-term response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document