scholarly journals Prevention and Killing Efficacy of Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci (VRE) Biofilms by Antibiotic-Loaded Calcium Sulfate Beads

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3258
Author(s):  
Paul Stoodley ◽  
Jacob Brooks ◽  
Casey W. Peters ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Craig P. Delury ◽  
...  

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) have emerged as multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens associated with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (ALCSB) in inhibiting bacterial growth, encouraging biofilm formation and killing preformed biofilms of CRE and VRE. Three strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) and a strain of Enterococcus faecalis (EF) were used. ALCSB of 4.8-mm diameter were loaded with vancomycin (V) and gentamicin (G), V and rifampicin (R), V and tobramycin (T) or R and meropenem (M), and placed onto tryptic soy agar (TSA), spread with one of the test strains and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Beads were transferred daily onto fresh TSA spread plates and the zone of inhibition (ZOI) was recorded until no inhibition was observed. ALCSB containing R + M or R + V produced the most extensive ZOI up to 5 weeks. Biofilm prevention efficacy was investigated by challenging ALCSB daily with 5 × 105 CFU/mL bacterial cells and analyzing for biofilm formation at challenges 1, 2 and 3. In the biofilm killing experiments, ALCSB were added to pre-grown 3-day biofilms of KP and EF strains, which were then analyzed at days 1 and 3 post-exposure. The CFU counts and confocal images of the attached cells showed that ALCSB treatment reduced colonization and biofilm formation significantly (5–7 logs) with combinations of R + M or R + V, compared to unloaded beads. This study provides evidence that the local release of antibiotics from ALCSB may be useful in treating the biofilms of multidrug-resistant strains of CRE and VRE.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Lisa B. Gunnink ◽  
Donia J. Arouri ◽  
Floris E.J. Jolink ◽  
Mariëtte Lokate ◽  
Klaas de Jonge ◽  
...  

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are associated with prolonged hospitalization and higher risk of mortality. Patients arriving in the hospital via the emergency department (ED) are screened for the presence of MDROs in compliance with the screening protocols in order to apply the correct isolation measures. In the Dutch–German border region, local hospitals apply their own screening protocols which are based upon national screening protocols. The contents of the national and local MDRO screening protocols were compared on vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and carbapenemase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CPE/CRE). The practicality of the screening protocols was evaluated by performing an audit. As a result, the content of the MDRO screening protocols differed regarding risk factors for MDRO carriage, swab site, personal protective equipment, and isolation measures. The observations and questionnaires showed that the practicality was sufficient; however, the responsibility was not designated clearly and education regarding the screening protocols was deemed inappropriate. The differences between the MDRO screening protocols complicate patient care in the Dutch–German border region. Arrangements have to be made about the responsibility of the MDRO screening, and improvements are necessary concerning education regarding the MDRO screening protocols.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S330-S330
Author(s):  
Gabby LeBlanc ◽  
Brandon Brooks ◽  
Madeline Hartman ◽  
Maxwell B Hecht ◽  
Hoa Luong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Infections with Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) can result in a 50% mortality rate in compromised hosts. A major risk factor for clinical infection is intestinal colonization with CRE or VRE. There are currently no FDA-approved compounds to decolonize these organisms from the gastrointestinal tract (gut). Commensal microbes offer protection from pathogen infection; however, in immunocompromised hosts or with antibiotic treatment, the protective properties of the microbial community are compromised, leaving the gut susceptible to pathogen colonization. Higher concentrations of pathogens within the gut correlate with an increased risk of infection with MDROs. Our hypothesis is that reducing colonization of the gut with MDROs would reduce the likelihood of a clinical infection. Methods Kaleido built a platform that emulates the gut environment and allows for high throughput screening of Kaleido’s Microbiome Metabolic Therapies (MMT™) in human gut microbiomes ex vivo. Over 500 compounds were screened for their ability to reduce the levels of CRE and VRE in fecal microbial communities from both healthy subjects and critically ill patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results Kaleido’s lead MMTs selectively favor the growth of the commensal microbiota at the expense of pathogens, resulting in a decrease of CRE and VRE from 80% of the initial community to 5% in a single batch culture, as measured by 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Lead MMTs do not support growth of CRE and VRE strains in culture, nor of other pathogens frequently encountered in critically ill and immunocompromised patients, such as Clostridium difficile and common fungal pathogens. Conclusion These results suggest that intervention with MMTs may reduce CRE and VRE colonization and support further evaluation in patients colonized with CRE or VRE pathogens. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Teixeira Mendes ◽  
Matias Chiarastelli Salomão ◽  
Lísia Moura Tomichi ◽  
Maura Salaroli Oliveira ◽  
Mariana Graça ◽  
...  

Abstract Surveillance strategies to detect colonization is an important tool to prevent and control the spread of microorganisms especially among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) patients. Colonization by Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) has been evaluated as a risk factor for blood stream infection (BSI) in HSCT patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of routine surveillance culture to screening colonization and infection by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPa) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a HSCT unit. Methods Surveillance cultures were collected from patients admitted to the HSCT unit over one-year, with swabs for cultures on admission and then weekly until discharge. We compared surveillance culture positivity for each site and agent, also clinical and epidemiological data according to the colonization status. Results 200 HSCT patients underwent surveillance, with 1.323 samples collected. Infection due to MDRO occurred in 52 (21.5%) patients, among them 45 (86.5%) were blood stream infection (BSI) and 12 (23%) had positive surveillance culture before infection. 554 (41.8%) surveillance cultures were performed for CRPa, 413 (31.2%) for VRE, and 356 (27%) for CRE. Of these, 179 (13.5%) surveillance culture were positive, with greater positivity for oropharynx (6, 35.3%) CRPa, and rectal samples (16, 20.7%) for CRE. Being colonized by any MDRO, CRE (p <0.001) and CRPa (p = 0.027) was associated with a higher risk of infection in the bivariate analysis but being colonized was not associated with risk of death. Conclusion Previous colonization by MDRO was a significant risk factor for infection by these pathogens, mainly colonization by CRE. Overall, rectal swab was the best site with the higher positivity, and the oropharynx was also an option for CRPa investigation. Feces culture showed low positivity and should be avoided. Although the impact of the strategy on the mortality of patients undergoing HSCT is not clear, VRE surveillance should be questioned in auto-HSCT patients as it has an additional cost and little impact on survival.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S157-S157
Author(s):  
Pasri Maharom ◽  
Sorapop Pakdeewongse ◽  
Thammasin Inviya ◽  
Aungsumalin Sricharoon ◽  
Kaimuk Thongyen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document