scholarly journals Germline BRCA Mutation and Clinical Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Focusing on Survival and Failure Patterns: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Koreans

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 514
Author(s):  
Hakyoung Kim ◽  
Doo Ho Choi ◽  
Won Park

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a BRCA mutation on survival and failure patterns, focusing on the risk of ipsilateral recurrence and contralateral breast cancer in patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 300 patients with breast cancer who underwent genetic screening for BRCA1/2 genes and were treated at Samsung Medical Center between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010. Ultimately, clinical outcomes of 273 patients were analyzed. Results: The median follow-up duration was 102 months (range, 1 to 220 months). Patients with BRCA1/2-mutated tumors had a shorter 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate compared to those with non-mutated tumors (62.8% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.02). Regarding failure patterns, patients with BRCA1/2-mutated tumors showed a higher incidence of contralateral breast cancer than those with non-mutated tumors (BRCA1/2 non-mutated vs. mutated tumors: 4.9% vs. 26.0%, p < 0.001). BRCA mutation status remained a significant prognostic factor for contralateral breast recurrence-free survival (HR: 4.155; 95% CI: 1.789–9.652; p = 0.001). Korean patients with a BRCA mutation showed inferior DFS compared to those without a BRCA mutation. Conclusions: BRCA mutation status is a strong predictor of recurrence in contralateral breast cancer. Strategies such as prophylactic treatment and active surveillance should be discussed with breast cancer patients who have a BRCA mutation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Ramin ◽  
Diana R. Withrow ◽  
Brittny C. Davis Lynn ◽  
Gretchen L. Gierach ◽  
Amy Berrington de González

Abstract Background Estimates of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk in the modern treatment era by year of diagnosis and characteristics of the first breast cancer are needed to assess the impact of recent advances in breast cancer treatment and inform clinical decision making. Methods We examined CBC risk among 419,818 women (age 30–84 years) who were diagnosed with a first unilateral invasive breast cancer and survived ≥ 1 year in the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program cancer registries from 1992 to 2015 (follow-up through 2016). CBC was defined as a second invasive breast cancer in the contralateral breast ≥ 12 months after the first breast cancer. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of CBC by year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and tumor characteristics for the first breast cancer. Cumulative incidence of CBC was calculated for women diagnosed with a first breast cancer in the recent treatment era (2004–2015, follow-up through 2016). Results Over a median follow-up of 8 years (range 1–25 years), 12,986 breast cancer patients developed CBC. Overall, breast cancer patients had approximately twice the risk of developing cancer in the contralateral breast when compared to that expected in the general population (SIR = 2.21, 95% CI = 2.17–2.25). SIRs for CBC declined by year of first diagnosis, irrespective of age at diagnosis and estrogen receptor (ER) status (p-trends < 0.001), but the strongest decline was after an ER-positive tumor. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CBC ranged from 1.01% (95% CI = 0.90–1.14%) in younger women (age < 50 years) with a first ER-positive tumor to 1.89% (95% CI = 1.61–2.21%) in younger women with a first ER-negative tumor. Conclusion Declines in CBC risk are consistent with continued advances in breast cancer treatment. The updated estimates of cumulative incidence inform breast cancer patients and clinicians on the risk of CBC and may help guide treatment decisions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Han Lin ◽  
Shin-Cheh Chen ◽  
Ling-Ming Tseng ◽  
King-Jen Chang ◽  
Ai-Chu Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Breast cancer is increasing around the globe, including Asia. We aimed to examine the survival and risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in Asian breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations. MethodsA total of 128 breast cancer patients with germline BRCA mutations and 4,754 control breast cancer patients were enrolled. Data on clinical pathologic characteristics, survival and CBC were collected from the medical record. The rates of survival and CBC were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results The mean age of onset in BRCA mutation carriers was significantly younger than control patients (BRCA vs. Non-BRCA: 43.9 vs. 53.2 years-old). BRCA mutation carriers had a higher proportion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (52%) than control patients (12%, p<0.001). The risk of CBC was significantly higher in BRCA mutation patients than in control cases (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.95, 95% CI 2.71-5.75); when stratified by genotype, the HRs (95%CI) were 4.84 (3.00-7.82) for BRCA1 and 3.13 (1.78-5.49) for BRCA2 carriers, respectively. Moreover, BRCA1 mutation patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) as their first breast cancer had the highest risk of CBC (HR = 5.55, 95% CI 3.29-9.34). However, we did not observe any differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival between mutation carriers and control patients. ConclusionOur study suggest that BRCA patients had a significantly higher risk of developing CBC, particularly for BRCA1 mutation carriers with TNBC as the first breast cancer.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark van Barele ◽  
Delal Akdeniz ◽  
Bernadette AM Heemskerk-Gerritsen ◽  
Margreet HA Baaijens ◽  
Margriet GA Sattler ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2712-2721 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Sertoli ◽  
P Bruzzi ◽  
P Pronzato ◽  
P Queirolo ◽  
D Amoroso ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The aim of this multicentric randomized trial was to determine whether reducing the interval between surgery and chemotherapy improves the outcome of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 1985 and July 1992, 600 breast cancer patients, clinical stages T1-3A,N0-2,M0 were randomly assigned to a perioperative cycle (PC) of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CEF). Node-negative (N-) patients did not receive any further treatment. Node positive (N+) patients received 11 cycles if previously given PC, or 12 cycles of CEF alternated with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CMF). In addition, N+ patients received concomitant or sequential 5-year tamoxifen therapy. RESULTS At a median follow-up duration of 5.7 years, no significant difference in survival (88% v 84%, P = .3) between the two treatment arms was seen. However, a difference of borderline significance in relapse-free survival (RFS; 76% v 70%, P = .053) was evident. A significant survival advantage for the PC arm was detected only in the estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients (P = .003). RFS was significantly improved in N- patients, postmenopausal patients, and ER- patients. Multivariate analyses show that pathologic tumor size, nodal status, receptor status, and treatment (only in ER- patients) are significantly correlated with survival and RFS. PC toxicity did not influence wound healing. CONCLUSION This study provides preliminary evidence that PC positively affects relapse rate and survival in some subgroups, namely, ER- patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1657-1663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Hackshaw ◽  
Michael Roughton ◽  
Sharon Forsyth ◽  
Kathryn Monson ◽  
Krystyna Reczko ◽  
...  

Purpose The Cancer Research UK “Over 50s” trial compared 5 and 2 years of tamoxifen in women with early breast cancer. Results are reported after median follow-up of 10 years. Patients and Methods Between 1987 and 1997, 3,449 patients age 50 to 81 years with operable breast cancer who had been taking 20 mg of tamoxifen for 2 years were randomly assigned to either stop or continue for an additional 3 years, if they were alive and recurrence free. Data on recurrences, new tumors, deaths, and cardiovascular events were obtained (April 2010). Results There were 1,103 recurrences, 755 deaths as a result of breast cancer, 621 cardiovascular (CV) events, and 236 deaths as a result of CV events. Fifteen years after starting treatment, for every 100 women who received tamoxifen for 5 years, 5.8 fewer experienced recurrence, compared with those who received tamoxifen for 2 years. The risk of contralateral breast cancer was significantly reduced (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.00). Among women age 50 to 59 years, there was a 35% reduction in CV events (P = .005) and 59% reduction in death as a result of a CV event (P = .02); in older women, the effect was much smaller and not statistically significant. Conclusion Taking tamoxifen for the recommended 5 years reduces the risk of recurrence or contralateral breast cancer 15 years after starting treatment. It also lowers the risk of CV disease and death as a result of a CV event, particularly among those age 50 to 59 years. Women should therefore be encouraged to complete the full course. Although aromatase inhibitors improve disease-free survival, tamoxifen remains a cheap and highly effective alternative, particularly in developing countries.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11017-11017
Author(s):  
R. Wesolowski ◽  
T. K. Choueiri ◽  
L. Rybicki ◽  
A. G. Shealy ◽  
G. Casey ◽  
...  

11017 Background: Since the BRCA gene is responsible for excisional DNA repair, we hypothesized that breast cancer patients with BRCA mutation would be more susceptible to the induction of second malignancies following chemotherapy treatment than breast cancer patients who tested negative for BRCA mutations. Methods: Breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations at the Cleveland Clinic were identified and evaluated for history of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and for the occurrence of subsequent non-breast primary invasive cancer. Patients with inadequate follow-up and those with inoperable disease at diagnosis were excluded from the analysis. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare different cohorts. The IRB at Cleveland Clinic approved the study. Results: Of 115 identified breast cancer patients tested for BRCA mutations, 77 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven of these patients carried BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and 50 tested negative for these mutations. Twelve patients (44%) in the BRCA positive group and 8 patients (16%) in the BRCA negative group underwent prophylactic oophorectomy. Median follow-up for the two groups was 53.5 months (75 months in the BRCA positive group and 48.5 months in the BRCA negative group). Median age at diagnosis was 42 years (40.5 years in the BRCA positive group and 44.5 in the BRCA negative group). In the BRCA positive group 3 of 25 patients (12%) treated with chemotherapy developed second malignancies (ovarian cancer, transitional cell cancer in urinary tract and renal cell carcinoma) compared with none of the 2 patients who did not get chemotherapy (p= 1.0). In the BRCA negative group, 2/34 patients (6%), treated with chemotherapy developed second cancers compared with 2/16 patients (12%), who were not treated with chemotherapy (p=0.58). Cancers in the BRCA negative group included two bladder carcinomas in the chemotherapy treated patients and in the non-chemotherapy group, non-small cell lung cancer, uterine, ovarian, endometrial and peritoneal cancers. Conclusions: At more than 4-years of follow up, chemotherapy in operable breast cancer patients was not associated with an increase in the risk of secondary malignancy or with a differential effect on this endpoint by BRCA mutation status in this retrospective study. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22065-e22065 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wesolowski ◽  
A. G. Shealy ◽  
J. Tao ◽  
H. C. Moore

e22065 Background: Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes lead to defects in DNA repair. Estrogen receptor modulates transcription of genes responsible for cell division, which depends on cell's ability to repair DNA for genomic integrity. Differential efficacy of endocrine therapy for breast cancer, therefore, may be possible depending on the tumor's BRCA mutation status. Methods: Through an IRB approved registry, breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and treated with endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor positive non-metastatic disease were identified. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) respectively. Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to assess differences among subgroups with respect to their characteristics. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify univariate and multivariate risk factors for OS and PFS. Results: Of 115 breast cancer patients tested for BRCA mutations, 63 met the inclusion criteria of whom 16 patients were BRCA 1 or 2 mutation positive and 47 were negative. In the BRCA(+) group, 14 patients (87.5%) had stage I-III disease at diagnosis. In the BRCA(-) group, 5 patients (10.6%) had stage 0 disease while 41 patients (87.2%) had stage I-III disease at diagnosis. Stage at diagnosis was unavailable for 2 BRCA(+) and 1 BRCA(-) patients. Both groups were similar with respect to Her-2 expression status, history of ovarian suppression, age of diagnosis, and age of menopause. Median age was 48 yo in BRCA(+) group, 42 yo in BRCA(-), (p=0.12). Median follow up was 76.1 mos in BRCA(+) and 62.9 mos in BRCA(-) group. OS was worse in BRCA(+) group (HR 7.38, 95% [CI] 1.49–36.4 p=0.014). After adjustment for stage and history of ovarian suppression, the difference remained significant (HR 16.6, 95% [CI] 1.95–142, p=0.010). There was no difference in PFS (HR 2.02, 95% [CI] 0.82–4.96, p=0.13). Conclusions: Patients with BRCA mutation, hormone-receptor positive hereditary breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy had inferior survival compared with similar patients who are BRCA mutation negative. Prospective studies to evaluate the differential effects of endocrine therapy in these populations are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 284-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Nowikiewicz ◽  
Magdalena Wiśniewska ◽  
Michał Wiśniewski ◽  
Marta Biedka ◽  
Iwona Głowacka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document