Faculty Opinions recommendation of Co-variation between seed dormancy, growth rate and flowering time changes with latitude in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Author(s):  
Bernhard Schmid
PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e61075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyne Debieu ◽  
Chunlao Tang ◽  
Benjamin Stich ◽  
Tobias Sikosek ◽  
Sigi Effgen ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e20886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Silady ◽  
Sigi Effgen ◽  
Maarten Koornneef ◽  
Matthieu Reymond

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4759-4764 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Meyer ◽  
M. Steinfath ◽  
J. Lisec ◽  
M. Becher ◽  
H. Witucka-Wall ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Sung Chung ◽  
Ha-Nul Lee ◽  
Thomas Leustek ◽  
David B. Knaff ◽  
Cheol Soo Kim

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quintin J Steynen ◽  
Dee A Bolokoski ◽  
Elizabeth A Schultz

We have identified three phases within the wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. rosette, based on significant differences in leaf shape, size, vascular pattern, and presence of abaxial trichomes. To test the hypothesis that a single, central mechanism controls the progression through all plant phases and that conditions that alter the time to flowering will also alter the progression through vegetative phases, we analysed the rosette phases under such conditions. In support of our hypothesis, we determined that those conditions (loss of LEAFY activity, short days) that decelerate time to flowering show decelerated progression through the rosette phases, while those conditions (loss of TERMINAL FLOWER, overexpression of LEAFY, low light) that accelerate time to flowering show accelerated progression through the rosette phases. In all conditions except short days, the length of the first phase was unaffected, indicating that this phase is less susceptible to influences of the central mechanism. Progression through the subsequent two rosette phases was accelerated differentially, such that the second phase was affected more strongly than the first. This supports the idea that, in the rosette, as in the inflorescence, the inhibition of phase transition by the central mechanism is gradually decreasing.Key words: phase change, flowering time, Arabidopsis thaliana, LEAFY, TERMINAL FLOWER, heteroblasty.


Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 360 (6392) ◽  
pp. 1014-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chen ◽  
Steven Penfield

Plants integrate seasonal signals, including temperature and day length, to optimize the timing of developmental transitions. Seasonal sensing requires the activity of two proteins, FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), that control certain developmental transitions in plants. During reproductive development, the mother plant uses FLC and FT to modulate progeny seed dormancy in response to temperature. We found that for regulation of seed dormancy, FLC and FT function in opposite configuration to how those same genes control time to flowering. For seed dormancy, FT regulates seed dormancy through FLC gene expression and regulates chromatin state by activating antisense FLC transcription. Thus, in Arabidopsis the same genes controlled in opposite format regulate flowering time and seed dormancy in response to the temperature changes that characterize seasons.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 901-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Kumar ◽  
Anamika Singh ◽  
Madhusmita Panigrahy ◽  
Pratap Kumar Sahoo ◽  
Kishore C. S. Panigrahi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document