Faculty Opinions recommendation of Primary external ventricular drainage catheter versus intraparenchymal ICP monitoring: outcome analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Sahuquillo ◽  
Alberto Biestro ◽  
Pedro Enríquez
Keyword(s):  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Drainage Catheter

Primary External Ventricular Drainage Catheter Versus Intraparenchymal ICP Monitoring: Outcome Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
James William Bales ◽  
Robert H. Bonow ◽  
Robert T. Buckley ◽  
Jason Barber ◽  
Nancy Temkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Drainage Catheter

Telemetric ICP monitoring after surgery for posterior fossa and third ventricular tumors

1984 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 649-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul H. Chapman ◽  
Eric Cosman ◽  
Michael Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Ventricular Catheter ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Ventricular Tumors ◽  
Fine Print

✓ After surgery for posterior fossa or third ventricular tumors, hydrocephalus may persist or evolve. Proper management of this complication requires timely detection. Temporary external ventricular drainage has been suggested by some authors as an adjunct to clinical observations and radiographic studies for unshunted patients. As an alternative, the authors have used a telemetric method of pressure monitoring in association with a ventricular catheter and subcutaneous reservoir. This has been found useful in eight patients without the disadvantages inherent in other methods of management.

scholarly journals Freehand insertion of external ventricular drainage catheter: Evaluation of accuracy in a single center

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
KengSiang Lee ◽  
JohnJiong Yang Zhang ◽  
Nagarjun Bolem ◽  
MayLian Leong ◽  
ChunPeng Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Drainage Catheter

The history of external ventricular drainage

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 228-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Visish M. Srinivasan ◽  
Brent R. O'Neill ◽  
Diana Jho ◽  
Donald M. Whiting ◽  
Michael Y. Oh
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
18Th Century ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Reye Syndrome ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
History Of ◽  
Materials Used

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures. It was first performed as early as 1744 by Claude-Nicholas Le Cat. Since then, there have been numerous changes in technique, materials used, indications for the procedure, and safety. The history of EVD is best appreciated in 4 eras of progress: development of the technique (1850–1908), technological advancements (1927–1950), expansion of indications (1960–1995), and accuracy, training, and infection control (1995–present). While EVD was first attempted in the 18th century, it was not until 1890 that the first thorough report of EVD technique and outcomes was published by William Williams Keen. He was followed by H. Tillmanns, who described the technique that would be used for many years. Following this, many improvements were made to the EVD apparatus itself, including the addition of manometry by Adson and Lillie in 1927, and continued experimentation in cannulation/drainage materials. Technological advancements allowed a great expansion of indications for EVD, sparked by Nils Lundberg, who published a thorough analysis of the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with brain tumors in 1960. This led to the application of EVD and ICP monitoring in subarachnoid hemorrhage, Reye syndrome, and traumatic brain injury. Recent research in EVD has focused on improving the overall safety of the procedure, which has included the development of guidance-based systems, virtual reality simulators for trainees, and antibiotic-impregnated catheters.

Accuracy of external ventricular drainage catheter placement

2011 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ghazi Abdoh ◽  
Olivier Bekaert ◽  
Jérôme Hodel ◽  
Salia Mamadou Diarra ◽  
Caroline Le Guerinel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Drainage Catheter

An outcome analysis of two different procedures of burr-hole trephine and external ventricular drainage in acute hydrocephalus

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Schödel ◽  
Martin Proescholdt ◽  
Odo-Winfried Ullrich ◽  
Alexander Brawanski ◽  
Karl-Michael Schebesch
Keyword(s):  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Burr Hole ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Acute Hydrocephalus

scholarly journals Evaluation of a novel noninvasive ICP monitoring device in patients undergoing invasive ICP monitoring: preliminary results

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1653-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Ganslandt ◽  
Stylianos Mourtzoukos ◽  
Andreas Stadlbauer ◽  
Björn Sommer ◽  
Rudolf Rammensee
Keyword(s):  
Signal Analysis ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Acoustic Signals ◽  
External Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Acoustic Properties ◽  
Ventricular Drainage ◽  
Icp Monitoring ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Data Points ◽  
The Brain

OBJECTIVEThere is no established method of noninvasive intracranial pressure (NI-ICP) monitoring that can serve as an alternative to the gold standards of invasive monitoring with external ventricular drainage or intraparenchymal monitoring. In this study a new method of NI-ICP monitoring performed using algorithms to determine ICP based on acoustic properties of the brain was applied in patients undergoing invasive ICP (I-ICP) monitoring, and the results were analyzed.METHODSIn patients with traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage who were undergoing treatment in a neurocritical intensive care unit, the authors recorded ICP using the gold standard method of invasive external ventricular drainage or intraparenchymal monitoring. In addition, the authors simultaneously measured the ICP noninvasively with a device (the HS-1000) that uses advanced signal analysis algorithms for acoustic signals propagating through the cranium. To assess the accuracy of the NI-ICP method, data obtained using both I-ICP and NI-ICP monitoring methods were analyzed with MATLAB to determine the statistical significance of the differences between the ICP measurements obtained using NI-ICP and I-ICP monitoring.RESULTSData were collected in 14 patients, yielding 2543 data points of continuous parallel ICP values in recordings obtained from I-ICP and NI-ICP. Each of the 2 methods yielded the same number of data points. For measurements at the ≥ 17–mm Hg cutoff, which was arbitrarily chosen for this preliminary analysis, the sensitivity and specificity for the NI-ICP monitoring were found to be 0.7541 and 0.8887, respectively. Linear regression analysis indicated that there was a strong positive relationship between the measurements. Differential pressure between NI-ICP and I-ICP was within ± 3 mm Hg in 63% of data-paired readings and within ± 5 mm Hg in 85% of data-paired readings. The receiver operating characteristic–area under the curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve was 0.895, corresponding to the overall performance of NI-ICP monitoring in comparison with I-ICP monitoring.CONCLUSIONSThis study provides the first clinical data on the accuracy of the HS-1000 NI-ICP monitor, which uses advanced signal analysis algorithms to evaluate properties of acoustic signals traveling through the brain in patients undergoing I-ICP monitoring. The findings of this study highlight the capability of this NI-ICP device to accurately measure ICP noninvasively. Further studies should focus on clinical validation for elevated ICP values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document