scholarly journals Assessment of Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Epidural Neuroplasty Using a Racz-Catheter and Predictive Factors of Efficacy in Patients with Cervical Spinal Pain

2015 ◽  
Vol 2;18 (2;3) ◽  
pp. E163-E170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Hoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Previous Surgery ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Total Pain

Background: Epidural neuroplasty using the Racz catheter has a therapeutic effect in patients with cervical disc herniation and central stenosis who do not respond to fluoroscopically guided epidural injections. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of cervical epidural neuroplasty in patients with posterior neck and upper extremity pain and to demonstrate correlations between predictive factors and unsuccessful results of cervical epidural neuroplasty. Study Design: Observational study. Setting: An interventional pain management practice in a university hospital. Methods: Outcome measures were obtained using the numeric rating scale (NRS) for total pain, neck pain, arm pain, and sleep disturbance; and the neck pain and disability scale (NPDS); as well as opioid consumption at preprocedure, one month, 3, 6, and 12 months after procedure. Successful epidural neuroplasty was defined as 50% or greater reduction from the preprocedure NRS for total pain, and at least a 40% reduction in the NPDS. We obtained clinical data and radiologic findings to evaluate correlations between predictive factors and efficacy of epidural neuroplasty. Results: Of the 169 patients, successful outcomes were observed in 108 patients (63.9%) at one month following the procedure, in 109 patients (64.5%) at 3 months, in 96 patients (56.8%) at 6 months, and in 89 patients (52.7%) at 12 months. Previous surgery, spondylolisthesis, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were significantly associated with unsuccessful outcomes as measured by NRS and NPDS (P < 0.05). Limitations: Limitations of this evaluation include the lack of a placebo group. Conclusions: Cervical epidural neuroplasty may be an effective treatment for pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with cervical spinal pain who did not respond to conservative treatment, and may decrease surgical demand. Previous surgery, spondylolisthesis, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament are associated with unsuccesful outcomes of epidural neuroplasty. Key words: Cervical spinal pain, epidural neuroplasty, percutaneous adhesiolysis, predictive factor, racz catheter

Is there a difference in range of motion, neck pain, and outcomes in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament versus those with cervical spondylosis, treated with plated laminoplasty?

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. E9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahito Fujimori ◽  
Hai Le ◽  
John E. Ziewacz ◽  
Dean Chou ◽  
Praveen V. Mummaneni
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
The Mean

Object There are little data on the effects of plated, or plate-only, open-door laminoplasty on cervical range of motion (ROM), neck pain, and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare ROM after a plated laminoplasty in patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) versus those with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and to correlate ROM with postoperative neck pain and neurological outcomes. Methods The authors retrospectively compared patients with a diagnosis of cervical stenosis due to either OPLL or CSM who had been treated with plated laminoplasty in the period from 2007 to 2012 at the University of California, San Francisco. Clinical outcomes were measured using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale and neck visual analog scale (VAS). Radiographic outcomes included assessment of changes in the C2–7 Cobb angle at flexion and extension, ROM at C2–7, and ROM of proximal and distal segments adjacent to the plated lamina. Results Sixty patients (40 men and 20 women) with an average age of 63.1 ± 10.9 years were included in the study. Forty-one patients had degenerative CSM and 19 patients had OPLL. The mean follow-up period was 20.9 ± 13.1 months. The mean mJOA score significantly improved in both the CSM and the OPLL groups (12.8 to 14.5, p < 0.01; and 13.2 to 14.2, respectively; p = 0.04). In the CSM group, the mean VAS neck score significantly improved from 4.2 to 2.6 after surgery (p = 0.01), but this improvement did not reach the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Neither was there significant improvement in the VAS neck score in the OPLL group (3.6 to 3.1, p = 0.17). In the CSM group, ROM at C2–7 significantly decreased from 32.7° before surgery to 24.4° after surgery (p < 0.01). In the OPLL group, ROM at C2–7 significantly decreased from 34.4° to 20.8° (p < 0.01). In the CSM group, the change in the VAS neck score significantly correlated with the change in the flexion angle (r = − 0.31) and the extension angle (r = − 0.37); however, it did not correlate with the change in ROM at C2–7 (r = − 0.1). In the OPLL group, the change in the VAS neck score did not correlate with the change in the flexion angle (r = 0.03), the extension angle (r = − 0.17), or the ROM at C2–7 (r = − 0.28). The OPLL group had a significantly greater loss of ROM after surgery than did the CSM group (p = 0.04). There was no significant correlation between the change in ROM and the mJOA score in either group. Conclusions Plated laminoplasty in patients with either OPLL or CSM decreases cervical ROM, especially in the extension angle. Among patients who have undergone laminoplasty, those with OPLL lose more ROM than do those with CSM. No correlation was observed between neck pain and ROM in either group. Neither group had a change in neck pain that reached the MCID following laminoplasty. Both groups improved in neurological function and outcomes.

scholarly journals Differences between C3–4 and other subaxial levels of cervical disc arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 752-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Yuan Chang ◽  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Wen-Cheng Huang ◽  
Li-Yu Fay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain

OBJECTIVE Several large-scale clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of 1- and 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for degenerative disc disease (DDD) in the subaxial cervical spine, while other studies reveal that during physiological neck flexion, the C4–5 and C5–6 discs account for more motion than the C3–4 level, causing more DDD. This study aimed to compare the results of CDA at different levels. METHODS After a review of the medical records, 94 consecutive patients who underwent single-level CDA were divided into the C3–4 and non-C3–4 CDA groups (i.e., those including C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7). Clinical outcomes were measured using the visual analog scale for neck and arm pain and by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Postoperative range of motion (ROM) and heterotopic ossification (HO) were determined by radiography and CT, respectively. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients (93.6%; mean age 45.62 ± 10.91 years), including 41 (46.6%) female patients, underwent a mean follow-up of 4.90 ± 1.13 years. There were 11 patients in the C3–4 CDA group and 77 in the non-C3–4 CDA group. Both groups had significantly improved clinical outcomes at each time point after the surgery. The mean preoperative (7.75° vs 7.03°; p = 0.58) and postoperative (8.18° vs 8.45°; p = 0.59) ROMs were similar in both groups. The C3–4 CDA group had significantly greater prevalence (90.9% vs 58.44%; p = 0.02) and higher severity grades (2.27 ± 0.3 vs 0.97 ± 0.99; p = 0.0001) of HO. CONCLUSIONS Although CDA at C3–4 was infrequent, the improved clinical outcomes of CDA were similar at C3–4 to that in the other subaxial levels of the cervical spine at the approximately 5-year follow-ups. In this Asian population, who had a propensity to have ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, there was more HO formation in patients who received CDA at the C3–4 level than in other subaxial levels of the cervical spine. While the type of artificial discs could have confounded the issue, future studies with more patients are required to corroborate the phenomenon.

scholarly journals Can segmental mobility be increased by cervical arthroplasty?

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. E3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsuan-Kan Chang ◽  
Chih-Chang Chang ◽  
Tsung-Hsi Tu ◽  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Wen-Cheng Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Segmental Mobility ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

OBJECTIVE Many reports have successfully demonstrated that cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) can preserve range of motion after 1- or 2-level discectomy. However, few studies have addressed the extent of changes in segmental mobility after CDA or their clinical correlations. METHODS Data from consecutive patients who underwent 1-level CDA were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for surgery were medically intractable degenerative disc disease and spondylosis. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS)–measured neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, were analyzed. Radiographic outcomes, including C2–7 Cobb angle, the difference between pre- and postoperative C2–7 Cobb angle (ΔC2–7 Cobb angle), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the difference between pre- and postoperative SVA (ΔSVA), segmental range of motion (ROM), and the difference between pre- and postoperative ROM (ΔROM), were assessed for their association with clinical outcomes. All patients underwent CT scanning, by which the presence and severity of heterotopic ossification (HO) were determined during the follow-up. RESULTS A total of 50 patients (mean age 45.6 ± 9.33 years) underwent a 1-level CDA (Prestige LP disc) and were followed up for a mean duration of 27.7 ± 8.76 months. All clinical outcomes, including VAS, NDI, and JOA scores, improved significantly after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative ROM values were similar (mean 9.5° vs 9.0°, p > 0.05) at each indexed level. The mean changes in segmental mobility (ΔROM) were −0.5° ± 6.13°. Patients with increased segmental mobility after surgery (ΔROM > 0°) had a lower incidence of HO and HO that was less severe (p = 0.048) than those whose ΔROM was < 0°. Segmental mobility (ROM) was significantly lower in patients with higher HO grade (p = 0.012), but it did not affect the clinical outcomes. The preoperative and postoperative C2–7 Cobb angles and SVA remained similar. The postoperative C2–7 Cobb angles, SVA, ΔC2–7 Cobb angles, and ΔSVA were not correlated to clinical outcomes after CDA. CONCLUSIONS Segmental mobility (as reflected by the mean ROM) and overall cervical alignment (i.e., mean SVA and C2–7 Cobb angle) had no significant impact on clinical outcomes after 1-level CDA. Patients with increased segmental mobility (ΔROM > 0°) had significantly less HO and similarly improved clinical outcomes than those with decreased segmental mobility (ΔROM < 0°).

scholarly journals P.229 Epidemiology and Outcomes of Neck Pain Following Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S86-S86
Author(s):  
MA MacLean ◽  
A Dakson ◽  
F Xavier ◽  
SD Christie ◽  
C Investigators
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Cervical Radiculopathy ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Composite Scale ◽  
Neck Disability

Background: Many studies have demonstrated improved arm pain (AP) following surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy (DCR); however, axial neck pain (NP) is generally not felt to improve. The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgery for DCR improves NP. Methods: A ambispective cohort study of the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) registry for patients who received 1-level, 2-level, 3-level ADCF (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for DCR. Outcomes: 12-month post-operative Visual Analogue Scale for NP (VAS-NP), Neck Disability Index (NDI), VAS for AP (VAS-AP), Short-Form Physical Health Composite Scale (SF36-PCS), and Mental Health Composite Scale (SF36-MCS). Results: We identified 603 patients with DCR. CDA patients were the youngest (ANOVA; p<0.001). Patients reported similar pre-operative AP, NP, disability, and health-related quality of life, regardless of procedure (ANOVA; all P>0.05). All procedures offered a statistically significant reduction in VAS-NP, VAS-AP, and NDI (ANOVA; all P<0.001). Mean change from baseline in NP, AP, and disability, were similar across procedures. At 12 months, mean reduction in VAS-AP, VAS-NP, and NDI exceeded minimal clinically important differences for nearly all procedures. Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgery for DCR can expect a clinically significant, approximate 50% reduction in NP, AP, and neck-related disability.

180 Long-Term Outcomes of Arthroplasty for Cervical Myelopathy Versus Radiculopathy, and Arthroplasty Versus Arthrodesis for Cervical Myelopathy

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 247-247
Author(s):  
Jeffrey McConnell ◽  
Matthew F Gornet ◽  
K Daniel Riew ◽  
Todd H Lanman ◽  
J Kenneth Burkus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Cervical Myelopathy ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Similar Improvement ◽  
Sf 36

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an effective treatment for symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD). Concerns remain about the appropriateness of CDA to treat patients with myelopathy. This study compares long-term safety and effectiveness of CDA in patients with myelopathy versus radiculopathy. METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospective 84-month data from IDE clinical trial of CDA vs ACDF for SCDD at 2 adjacent levels: NDI, neck/arm pain, SF-36 PCS, neurological status, adverse events (AEs), secondary surgeries at index and adjacent levels. A total of 397 patients were enrolled: 287 radiculopathy alone and 110 myelopathy +/− radiculopathy. Two comparisons were performed: 1)CDA for myelopathy vs radiculopathy. 2)CDA vs ACDF for myelopathy. RESULTS >All groups significantly improved for NDI, neck/arm pain, and PCS at 84 months. Comparison#1: Myelopathy and radiculopathy groups showed similar improvement for NDI (37.8 vs 35.8, P = 0.352), neck pain (12.0 vs 12.1, P = 0.477), arm pain (11.6 vs 9.6, P = 0.480), and PCS (14.1 vs 13.7, P = 0.863). Both groups had similar maintenance or improvement in neurological status (87.2% vs 93.5%, P = 0.218), serious AEs (54.5% vs 57.5%, P = 0.291) secondary surgeries at index (3.7% vs 4.4%, P = 0.839) and adjacent levels (3.7% vs 7.6%, P = 0.367). Comparison#2: The CDA and ACDF groups showed similar improvement for NDI (37.8 vs 31.1, P = 0.147), neck pain (12.0 vs 10.4, P = 0.337), arm pain (11.6 vs 11.4, P = 0.791) and PCS (14.1 vs 11.2, P = 0.363). Both groups had similar maintenance or improvement in neurological status (87.2% vs 96.2%, P = 0.409) and similar rates of secondary surgeries at the index (3.7% vs 9.4%, P = 0.374) and lower rates of surgeries at adjacent levels (3.7% vs 15.4%, P = 0.088). Compared to ACDF, CDA group demonstrated lower rates of serious AEs (54.5% vs 65.9%, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION Long-term, CDA is safe and effective for the treatment of myelopathy. Myelopathy patients gain similar improvement from CDA to patients with radiculopathy only. Furthermore, myelopathy patients report similar levels of improvement from CDA compared with ACDF, but suffer fewer serious AEs

Differences between soft-disc herniation and spondylosis in cervical arthroplasty: CT-documented heterotopic ossification with minimum 2 years of follow-up

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jau-Ching Wu ◽  
Wen-Cheng Huang ◽  
Tsung-Hsi Tu ◽  
Hsiao-Wen Tsai ◽  
Chin-Chu Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Object Cervical arthroplasty is a valid option for patients with single-level symptomatic cervical disc diseases causing neural tissue compression, but postoperative heterotopic ossification (HO) can limit the mobility of an artificial disc. In the present study the authors used CT scanning to assess HO formation, and they investigated differences in radiological and clinical outcomes in patients with either a soft-disc herniation or spondylosis who underwent cervical arthroplasty. Methods Medical records, radiographs, and clinical evaluations of consecutive patients who underwent single-level cervical arthroplasty were reviewed. Arthroplasty was performed using the Bryan disc. The patients were divided into a soft-disc herniation group and a spondylosis group. Clinical outcomes were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), whereas HO grading was determined by studying CT scans. Radiological and clinical outcomes were analyzed, and the minimum follow-up duration was 24 months. Results Forty-seven consecutive patients underwent a single-level cervical arthroplasty. Forty patients (85.1%) had complete radiological evaluations and clinical follow-up of more than 2 years. Patients were divided into 1 of 2 groups: soft-disc herniation (16 cases) and the spondylosis group (24 cases). Their mean age was 45.51 ± 11.12 years. Sixteen patients (40%) were female. Patients in the soft-disc herniation group were younger than those in the spondylosis group, but the difference was not statistically significant (42.88 vs 47.26, p = 0.227). The mean follow-up duration was 38.83 ± 9.74 months. Sex, estimated blood loss, implant size, and perioperative NSAID prescription were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.792, 0.267, 0.581, and 1.000, respectively). The soft-disc herniation group had significantly less HO formation than the spondylosis group (1 HO [6.25%] vs 14 Hos [58.33%], p = 0.001). Almost all artificial discs in both groups remained mobile (100% and 95.8%, p = 0.408). The clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups at all postoperative time points of evaluation, and clinical improvements were also similar. Conclusions Clinical outcomes of single-level cervical arthroplasty for soft-disc herniation and spondylosis were similar 3 years after surgery. There was a significantly higher rate of HO formation in patients with spondylosis than in those with a soft-disc herniation. The mobility of the artificial disc is maintained, but the long-term effects of HO and its higher frequency in spondylotic cases warrant further investigation.

scholarly journals Occurrence and clinical implications of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP Cervical Disc at 2 contiguous levels

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Matthew F. Gornet ◽  
Todd H. Lanman ◽  
J. Kenneth Burkus ◽  
Randall F. Dryer ◽  
Jeffrey R. McConnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heterotopic Ossification ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Grade Iii ◽  
The Prestige

OBJECTIVEThe authors sought to assess the impact of heterotopic ossification (HO) on clinical outcomes and angular range of motion (ROM) after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) performed with the Prestige LP Cervical Disc (Prestige LP disc) at 2 levels.METHODSHO was assessed and graded from 0 to IV for increasing severity on lateral neutral radiographs at each visit in 209 patients who underwent implantation of Prestige LP discs at 2 cervical levels in a clinical trial with extended 10-year follow-up. ROM was compared by using HO grade, and clinical outcomes were compared between HO subgroups (grade 0–II vs III/IV) based on HO severity at 2 and 10 years after surgery.RESULTSThe grade III/IV HO incidence at either or both index levels was 24.2% (48/198) at 2 years and 39.0% (57/146) at 10 years. No statistical difference was found in overall success; neurological success; or Neck Disability Index (NDI), neck pain, arm pain, or SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores between the HO subgroups (grade 0–II vs III/IV) at either 2 or 10 years. The cumulative rate of possible implant-related adverse events (AEs) was higher in patients having grade III/IV HO at 2 years (56.3%) and 10 years (47.8%) compared with those having grade 0–II HO at 2 years (24.4%) and 10 years (17.9%), specifically in 2 subcategories: spinal events and HOs reported by the investigators. No statistical difference was found between the HO subgroups in possible implant-related serious AEs or secondary surgeries at the index or adjacent levels. The average angular ROMs at index levels were lower in subjects with higher-grade HO at 2 and 10 years. The average ROMs at the superior level were 8.8°, 6.6°, 3.2°, and 0.3°, respectively, for the HO grade 0/I, II, III, and IV groups at 10 years, and 7.9°, 6.2°, 3.7°, and 0.6°, respectively, at the inferior level.CONCLUSIONSRadiographically severe (grade III or IV) HO after CDA with the Prestige LP disc at 2 levels did not significantly affect efficacy or safety outcomes (severe AEs or secondary surgeries). However, severe HO, particularly grade IV HO, significantly limited ROM, as expected.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Effects and Safety of Percutaneous Disc Decompression with Coblation Nucleoplasty in Cervical Vertigo: A Retrospective Outcome Study with 74 Consecutive Patients and Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22;3) ◽  
pp. E205-E214
Author(s):  
Limin Rong
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Dizziness Handicap Inventory ◽  
Cervical Vertigo

Background: Surgical treatment of cervical vertigo has been rarely reported. This is the first retrospective study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous disc decompression with coblation nucleoplasty (PDCN) for treatment of cervical vertigo. Objectives: To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with cervical vertigo who failed to improve with conservative care and who were subsequently treated with PDCN. Study Design: This study used a retrospective design. Setting: The research was conducted within an interventional vertigo management and spine practice. Methods: Seventy-four consecutive patients with cervical vertigo underwent PDCN and were followed for at least one year. Outcome measures included the dizziness intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS), dizziness frequency, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and neck pain intensity. Clinical efficacy was assessed by rating scale and the modified MacNab evaluation criteria. Surgical complications during the operation and follow-up were also recorded. Results: The vertigo VAS score, frequency of dizziness, DHI, and neck pain intensity were all decreased significantly from evaluation before surgery to one week after surgery and to the last follow-up, giving a mean effective rate of 94.6% one week after surgery and 90.6% at the last follow-up. Good to excellent results were attained in 85.1% of these patients one week after PDCN and in 75.7% of the sufferers at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). There were 5 patients with transient adverse effects (6.25%) reported within the first month after surgery; they all recovered after conservative treatment. No neurological complications were found and no patient went on to spinal fusion surgery thereafter. Limitations: The rate of follow-up was 70% and a placebo effect cannot be excluded. There is no gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical vertigo so far. Conclusion: The clinical outcomes of PDCN for cervical vertigo were satisfactory in both the early and late postoperative period. PDCN is an effective, low-complication, minimally invasive procedure used to treat cervical vertigo. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are essential to verify this conclusion. Key words: Cervical vertigo, percutaneous disc decompression, coblation nucleoplasty, longterm outcome, dizziness intensity, dizziness frequency, dizziness handicap inventory, clinical efficacy, surgical complication, retrospective study

The relative effectiveness of the combination of spinal manipulation and Homoeopathic Simillimum in the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Kym Belling
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Spinal Manipulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Clinical Trial Design ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Objective Measurements ◽  
Group B

Background: According to Picavet and Schouten (2003) the incidence of neck pain is increasing at a greater rate than other spine problems (Hoving et al. 2004). Furthermore, chronic neck pain is a substantial burden to society with chronic neck pain being the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide (Hoy et al. 2014). Chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP) has been defined as localised, asymmetrical neck pain with restricted range of motion and dysfunctional musculature (Grieve, 1988). Treatments for those suffering with chronic pain, which are non-surgical, appear to be the most beneficial for patients according to Haldeman et al. (2008). Giles and Müller (1999) have stated that spinal manipulation is the most effective method of treating spinal pain on its own. However, the literature suggests that there is benefit in combining manipulation with an “anti-inflammatory type” drug (Crawford 1988; Oberbaum 1998; Serrentino 2003). Many studies have been successfully conducted on Homoeopathic complexes to treat neck pain (Fisher 1986; Bohmer and Ambrus 1992; Hepburn 2000; Soeken 2004) however no study has yet to been carried out on the combination of Homoeopathic Simillimum (single remedy) and spinal manipulation for CMNP. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if spinal manipulation and Homoeopathic Simillimum in combination are more relatively effective than spinal manipulation alone in the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain. Methodology: This study was a randomised, blinded placebo controlled quantitative trial with a comparative clinical trial design. Thirty consenting participants with CMNP who met the inclusion criteria were randomly distributed between two treatment groups. Group A received spinal manipulation as well as Homoeopathic Simillimum and group B received spinal manipulation with placebo medication. Each participant received three treatments over a period of a week; with subjective and objective readings taken at every consultation. The subjective tools included the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Canadian Memorial College of Chiropractic Neck Disability Index. Objective tools included the Algometer and CROM-II Goniometer. All data captured was analysed using SPSS version 24.0. Inferential and non-parametric analysis of the data were also be performed. Results: The results showed that no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of subjective and objective measurements. However, there were statistically significant improvements seen in both groups equally in terms of ANOVA subjective and objective measurements i.e. both groups showed improvement. Conclusion: The results of this study concluded that no statistical or clinically significant changes were noticed between the groups and therefore the Homoeopathic Simillimum added no statistical significant improvements in those who received it over those participants who received placebo in the treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain.

scholarly journals Mechanical Stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Preliminary, Observational Study Using Radiostereometric Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-302
Author(s):  
Miranda L. van Hooff ◽  
Petra J. C. Heesterbeek ◽  
Maarten Spruit
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Radiostereometric Analysis ◽  
Disc Arthroplasty ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Over Time

Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: To investigate the primary stability of the Prodisc-C Vivo cervical disc arthroplasty with regard to the adjacent cervical vertebrae using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), and to monitor its clinical performance. Methods: Sixteen patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were included. RSA radiographs were obtained at the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Migration (translation [mm]) of the superior and inferior implant components were measured with model-based RSA, expressed along the 3 orthogonal axes, and calculated as total translation. Clinical outcomes were Neck Disability Index, numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain, Likert-type scales for satisfaction, and adverse events. Range of motion was reported as C2-C7 flexion-extension mobility (ROM). Results: At final follow-up, no significant increase over time in median total translation was found. One inferior and 3 superior components subsided but were asymptomatic. ROM remained stable and clinical outcomes improved over time. Although 3 patients were unsatisfied and 3 adverse events occurred, this was not related to translation of the components. Conclusions: On a group level, both components of the Prodisc-C Vivo cervical disc arthroplasty remained stable over time and below the clinical threshold of 1 mm. Individual outliers for translation were not clinically relevant and probably related to settling of the components into the vertebral endplates. RSA allowed us to perform a preliminary but accurate study on the micromotion of a new cervical disc replacement in a small sample size, without putting large numbers of patients at risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document