scholarly journals Detrimental Effect of Cell Phones and its Awareness among Adolescents in Selected Urban Community of Sikar City (Rajasthan)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 192-197
Author(s):  
Mahipal Singh ◽  
Nilesh Soni
2021 ◽  
pp. 126958
Author(s):  
Campista-León Samuel ◽  
López-Espinoza José Uriel ◽  
Garcia-Guerrero Joel Tohevaris ◽  
Alfonso-Corrado Cecilia ◽  
Clark-Tapia Ricardo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
LARRY GREENBAUM
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Kuntsche ◽  
Florian Labhart

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a way of collecting data in people’s natural environments in real time and has become very popular in social and health sciences. The emergence of personal digital assistants has led to more complex and sophisticated EMA protocols but has also highlighted some important drawbacks. Modern cell phones combine the functionalities of advanced communication systems with those of a handheld computer and offer various additional features to capture and record sound, pictures, locations, and movements. Moreover, most people own a cell phone, are familiar with the different functions, and always carry it with them. This paper describes ways in which cell phones have been used for data collection purposes in the field of social sciences. This includes automated data capture techniques, for example, geolocation for the study of mobility patterns and the use of external sensors for remote health-monitoring research. The paper also describes cell phones as efficient and user-friendly tools for prompt manual data collection, that is, by asking participants to produce or to provide data. This can either be done by means of dedicated applications or by simply using the web browser. We conclude that cell phones offer a variety of advantages and have a great deal of potential for innovative research designs, suggesting they will be among the standard data collection devices for EMA in the coming years.


Author(s):  
Bastien Trémolière ◽  
Marie-Ève Gagnon ◽  
Isabelle Blanchette

Abstract. Although the detrimental effect of emotion on reasoning has been evidenced many times, the cognitive mechanism underlying this effect remains unclear. In the present paper, we explore the cognitive load hypothesis as a potential explanation. In an experiment, participants solved syllogistic reasoning problems with either neutral or emotional contents. Participants were also presented with a secondary task, for which the difficult version requires the mobilization of cognitive resources to be correctly solved. Participants performed overall worse and took longer on emotional problems than on neutral problems. Performance on the secondary task, in the difficult version, was poorer when participants were reasoning about emotional, compared to neutral contents, consistent with the idea that processing emotion requires more cognitive resources. Taken together, the findings afford evidence that the deleterious effect of emotion on reasoning is mediated by cognitive load.


2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 1428-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessa Reed ◽  
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek ◽  
Roberta Michnick Golinkoff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document