scholarly journals Personal income tax as a tool for overcoming regional budget deficit

Author(s):  
Галина Автончук ◽  
Георгий Поздняков
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-218
Author(s):  
Richard J. Cebula

This empirical study adopts an open-economy loanable funds model to investigate the impact of post-Bretton Woods U.S. federal government budget deficits and personal income tax rates on the ex post real interest rate yield on thirty-year Treasury bonds. In this study, the budget deficit is measured in two different ways, the total (“unified”) budget deficit and the primary deficit (the total/unified deficit minus net interest payments). Two different estimation techniques, autoregressive two stage least squares estimation and the ARCH (Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity) Method, for the 1973-2016 study period provide evidence that the ex post real interest rate yield on thirty-year Treasury bonds has been an increasing function of both federal budget deficit measures (expressed as a percent of GDP) and the maximum marginal federal personal income tax rate. The estimations all imply that elevating either the total/unified or primary federal budget deficit appears to raise the cost of borrowing in the U.S., whereas reducing the maximum marginal personal income tax rate appears to reduce the cost of borrowing. Given the potential effects of longer-term real interest rates on investment in new plant and equipment and overall economic growth, policy-makers should not overlook these findings.


Author(s):  
K.A. Birilo ◽  
◽  
O.S. Kolesnikova ◽  

The article analyzes the current trends in the development of personal income tax in the Amur Region. The role of this tax in the formation of regional budget revenues is revealed.


Author(s):  
Vitalii Rysin ◽  
Illia Antoshchuk

The annual execution of the Consolidated Budget of Ukraine with a deficit determines the need for borrowing and increases the country's public debt. Failure to receive a significant amount of funds in the budgets of different levels is provoked primarily by tax evasion by a significant part of potential taxpayers. This applies in particular to the personal income tax, the bulk of which comes from the collection of salaries of individuals. The purpose of the article is to identify the impact of informal employment and non-payment of taxes on the budget's shortfall of a significant amount of tax revenues, to determine the possible consequences of this phenomenon and ways to minimize it. 2020 increased Ukraine's Consolidated Budget deficit almost threefold compared to 2019. This increase in the budget deficit was due not only to the emergence of unplanned costs associated with the negative consequences of the pandemic, but also to a reduction in tax revenues due to the quarantine restrictions imposed by the authorities. The excess of government spending over revenue has once again exacerbated the question of whether the state uses all its resources efficiently to fill the budget. Of course, it is difficult to fully assess how much the Consolidated Budget loses revenue each year due to corruption, money laundering, the shadow economy and a number of other factors. However, in the article, based on open data on the number of informally employed, we tried to estimate the budget losses from personal income tax from wages, based on the number of informally employed during 2014-2020, and compare the results with the size of the Consolidated Budget deficit of Ukraine similar period. This allowed us to assess the possibility of overcoming the budget deficit by removing a large number of informally employed workers from the shadow of income. It is determined that shadow employment is only one of the many factors of budget revenue shortfalls, but overcoming it can significantly reduce the budget deficit. However, overcoming informal employment and the shadow economy in general requires not only increased control over business activities and the payment of taxes, but also a set of measures to stimulate indirect impact, which in the medium term may lead to economic entities out of the shadows and legalize their income.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-120
Author(s):  
D. G. Chernik

The subject of the research is the procedure for personal income taxation. The purpose of the workwas to determine which personal taxation regime is more justified: progressive or proportional. The paperprovides the reasons for the transition from the progressive to the proportional tax. The risks and possibilities of transition to the progressive scale are analyzed. It is concluded that in order to achieve social justice and improve the welfare of the majority of peoplerather thana very small part of them, it is necessary to adopt a set of economic, fiscal and administrative measures aimed at solving a single task — ensuring the social and economic development of Russia. Discrete measures, such as the introduction of the progressive personal income tax will not lead to desired results. Moreover, the progressive tax cannot be introduced unlessit is ruled by law that large spendings of citizens must correspond to their incomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
F. S. AGUZAROVA ◽  

The article is devoted to the taxation of income of citizens in Russia. The author determined the role and place of the personal income tax, calculating its share in the structure of budget revenues of a particular subject. The ways of improving the taxation of personal income are identified.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document