scholarly journals PEMBUANGAN BAYI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-145
Author(s):  
Ni Nyoman Muryatini
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Instrument ◽  
Biological Parents ◽  
The Right

This study focuses on the disposal of the baby by the biological parents through killing the baby first then discarding. The study aims to find out the crime of child disposal from the perspective of human rights. The method used in this research is normative legal research, which is descriptive analysis to find a rule of law in order to answer the legal issues faced. The results showed that the right to life which is part of human rights has been owned by babies since they were in the womb as God's creatures. No one can take away someone's right to life. The increase in cases in the last three years proves that there is no deterrent effect on the perpetrators of crime. The urgency of making the right legal instrument is needed for perpetrators of child disposal crimes.   Penelitian ini dibatasi oleh pembuangan bayi yang dilakukan oleh orang tua kandung, dengan membunuh bayi terlebih dahulu kemudian dibuang. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tindak kejahatan pembuangan bayi bila ditinjau dari perspektif hak asasi manusia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yang bersifat deskriptif analisis untuk menemukan suatu aturan hukum guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwahak hidup yang merupakan bagian dari hak asasi manusia telah dimiliki oleh bayi semenjak berada di dalam kandungan sebagai mahluk ciptaan Tuhan. Tidak ada seorang pun yang dapat merampas hak hidup seseorang. Meningkatnya kasus dalam tiga tahun terakhir, membuktikan tidak adanya efek jera terhadap para pelaku kejahatan. Urgensi pembuatan instrumen hukum yang tepat diperlukan bagi pelaku kejahatan pembuangan bayi.  

scholarly journals Makuchyan and Minasyan v Azerbaijan and Hungary: Novel Questions of State Responsibility, Presidential Pardon, and Due Diligence of Sentencing Transfer Meet in a Rare Case of the Right to Life

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Kushtrim Istrefi ◽  
Cedric Ryngaert
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
State Responsibility ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
Prison Sentence ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Fourth Section ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right

Judgment: European Court of Human Rights, Makuchyan and Minasyan v Azerbaijan and Hungary 17247/13 (ECtHR, 26 May 2020) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction). Section of the Court: Chamber (Fourth Section). Applicable Convention Rights: Article 2 echr – violation of procedural obligations by Azerbaijan, no violation of substantive obligations by Azerbaijan, and no violation of procedural obligations by Hungary. Article 14 echr and Article 2 echr – violation by Azerbaijan. Article 38 – no violation by Azerbaijan or Hungary. Primary Legal Issues: Did Azerbaijan acknowledge and adopt the conduct of R.S. in question as its own, and does that violate substantive obligations under Article 2 echr; Did Azerbaijan violate the procedural limb of Article 2 by pardoning and releasing R.S. following his transfer from Hungary to Azerbaijan to serve the prison sentence; Did Hungary violate the procedural limb of Article 2 because of failing to secure specific diplomatic assurances that Azerbaijan will not release R.S. upon his transfer. Link to Case: <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202524>.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE, THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto . .
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense. Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.<br /><br />Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY EXECUTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense.    Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.    </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights</em></strong><strong><em>.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>

scholarly journals Vaccines for Tourism Business Actors: Fulfilment or Violation of Human Rights?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-416
Author(s):  
I Wayan Wiryawan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Vaccine Refusal ◽  
Tourism Sector ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Tourism sector is the largest source of income for Bali province of Indonesia. Unfortunately, the Covid-19 pandemic forced the closure of tourism. Therefore, Bali’s economic growth is experiencing decrease to -10.98%. To accelerate the reopening of tourism, the government has launched the national vaccine movement that also covers tourism business actors. Unfortunately, some parties resist the vaccination because the vaccine is not believed yet to be safe. By using doctrinal legal research, this study examined two problems: the right to health in the context of tourism and the construction of government policies against vaccine resistance by tourism business actors. It examined legal principles and synchronization of laws on human rights related to vaccination. The state is responsible to provide vaccination for the citizens in fulfilling the right to life and health. Each local government produces policy to deal with vaccine refusal. Jakarta and West Java are two provinces that impose fines for residents who refuse vaccines. On the other hand, Bali province does not impose sanctions on such residents. To ensure safety after the reopening of tourism, any local government can propose the record of vaccination as a requirement for every person who will return to work in the tourism sector.

scholarly journals KEBERADAAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA (KUHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Ratih Kumala Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Human Rights Violations ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
The Right

Capital punishment is the heaviest crime and difficult to apply in a country of law considering the death penalty is one of the acts of human rights violations, but to make someone discourage of committing a crime there needs to be rules or penalties that can provide a deterrent effect and provide security for the community from all form of crime. The purpose of writing is directed to find out the regulation of the Death Penalty in the Criminal Law Code which is stipulated in several articles in the Criminal Code and the existence of capital punishment in the legal system in Indonesia in terms of human rights perspective, which of course would be contrary to human rights, especially the right to life, however capital punishment is also needed as an effort to prevent the occurrence of crimes, especially those classified as serious

scholarly journals HUKUM PERDATA PROGRESIF: PERUBAHAN DAN KESINAMBUNGAN PENEMUAN HUKUM DI BIDANG HUKUM PERDATA

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
Maskur Hidayat
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Conflict Resolution ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Face ◽  
The Right ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Law is a tool that people can achieve order and the protection of basic human rights. Among others, the right to life and protection, both physical protection, protection of honor and decency and the protection of property rights or properties. The phrase that nothing is eternal except change undoubtedly also applies in the legal world. Every moment is always evolving human problems, as well as a method of conflict resolution must also keep abreast of developing issues. Became law at the center of media demands, namely the rule of law and sense of justice. On the side of the rule of law, justice demands that can be placed exactly over the other side into a sense of justice also demands that require judges to give a personal touch (case by case) in the face of any problems encountered in the trial. Keywords: rule of law, justice and progressive law.

scholarly journals HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Fitriani Amalia ◽  
Anies Prima Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Role Of The State ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Democratic Country

The existence of human rights in the conception of the rule of law and democracy in Indonesia is the most basic. However, the concept of regulating human rights by the state does not mean that there is a restriction on human rights by the State, but the concept is regulation by the State. Using normative legal research, also called doctrinal law research. In this type of legal research, law is often conceptualized as what is written in laws and regulations (law in books). Analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that, in a democratic country, the implementation of human rights is a must. The degree of implementation of democracy and human rights is also influenced by the role of the State. The implementation of democracy and human rights with the people's sovereignty are ideals to be achieved.Keywords: democracy; human rights. AbstrakKeberadaan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam konsepsi Negara hukum dan demokrasi di Indonesia suatu hal yang paling mendasar. Namun konsepsi pengaturan hak asasi manusia oleh negara tersebut bukan berarti terjadinya pengekangan hak asasi manusia oleh Negara, namun konsepsinya adalah pengaturan oleh Negara. Menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif, di sebut juga penelitian hukum doktrinal. Pada penelitian hukum jenis ini, acapkali hukum di konsepkan sebagai apa yang tertulis dalam peraturan perundang undangan (law in books). Dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pada suatu Negara yang berdemokrasi, implementasi Hak Asasi Manusia merupakan suatu keharusan. Tingkatan implementasi demokrasi dan hak asasi manusia juga dipengaruhi oleh peran Negara. Implementasi demokrasi dan Hak asasi manusia yang berkedaulatan rakyat merupakan cita-cita yang hendak dicapai.Kata Kunci : demokrasi; hak asasi manusia.

scholarly journals HAK PENDIDIKAN BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA

Asy-Syari ah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-256
Author(s):  
Ikbar Maulana Malik
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Disabled People ◽  
Right To Education ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Data Source ◽  
The Right

Abstract: Law regulates all aspects of life, one of which is education rights. Education is given to humans not only for non-disabled people (normal) but disability has the right of education because this indicates that there is justice and in order to achieve the objectives of the rule of law, namely to educate the life of the nation. However, there are several issues or cases that still seem to ignore the right of education for persons with disabilities. This study uses a method in the form of Descriptive Analysis, the type of data carried out is qualitative. Then the data source used is primary. Furthermore, in the technique of data collection is done by searching in books, articles, journals and other literacy. Then analyze the data by understanding and formulating conclusions on the problems used in the formulation of the problem. The results of this study are that there are still several factors that make the cause of not fulfilling the right to education for persons with disabilities then in the review of civil law and human rights very supportive for the implementation of the right to education for persons with disabilities given fully and thoroughly.Abstrak: Hukum mengatur segala aspek kehidupan salah satunya hak pendidikan. Pendidik­an diberikan kepada manusia bukan hanya bagi non disabilitas (normal) tetapi disabilitaspun mempunyai hak pendidikan sebab hal ini menandakan ada keadilan dan demi mencapai tujuan Negara hukum yaitu mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa. Namun ada beberapa isu atau kasus yang masih terkesan tidak memperdulikan hak pendidikan bagi penyandang disabilitas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode berupa Deskriptif Analisis, Jenis data yang dilakukan bersifat kualitatif. Kemudian Sumber data yang di pakai yaitu primer Selanjutnya dalam tehnik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara mencari dalam buku-buku, artikel, jurnal dan literasi lainnya. Kemudian dilakukan analisis data dengan memahami dan merumuskan kesimpulan terhadap masalah yang dijadikan dalam perumusan masalah. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah masih ada beberapa faktor yang menjadikan sebab tidak terpenuhinya secara efektif tentang hak pendidikan bagi penyandang disabilitas kemudian dalam tinjauan hukum perdata dan Hak Asasi Manusia sangat mendukung atas implementasi hak pendidikan bagi penyandang disabilitas diberikan secara penuh dan menyeluruh. 

scholarly journals EKSEKUSI HUKUMAN MATI Tinjauan Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah dan Keadilan

Al-Ahkam ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Imam Yahya
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The debate about death penalty, is still attracted attention of people. At least, there are, two mainstream firstly those who agrees and secondly who refuses the death penalty being imposed. For those who agrees reasoned that severe violations of the right to life, should be punished by death so that could provide a deterrent effect, while those who refuses argued that the death penalty is a denial of human rights, especially right to life. The essence of the death penalty is not a violation of the law, because the implementation the death penalty actually enforced in order to protect human rights itself. In the view of Islamic law, death penalty, can be done on four cases, namely that of adultery, killing intentionally, Hirabah and apostasy. Furthermore, the death penalty should be carried out in accordance with maqāṣid al-sharī'ah and justice. In maqāṣid al-sharī'ah perspective, the purpose of death penalty should refer to maintain religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), maintain body or maintain the survival (ḥifẓ al-nafs), mind (ḥifẓ al-'aql), descent (ḥifẓ alnasl), and maintaining property (ḥifẓ al-māl). While in the perspective of justice, State, on behalf of the law must protect its citizens from legal events that harm society.

KEBIJAKAN MODERASI PIDANA MATI

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Mei Susanto ◽  
Ajie Ramdan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Life Imprisonment ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Moderation Model ◽  
The Right

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007 selain menjadi dasar konstitusionalitas pidana mati, juga memberikan jalan tengah (moderasi) terhadap perdebatan antara kelompok yang ingin mempertahankan (retensionis) dan yang ingin menghapus (abolisionis) pidana mati. Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam putusan a quo dikaitkan dengan teori pemidanaan dan hak asasi manusia dan bagaimana kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 dikaitkan dengan putusan a quo. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian doktrinal, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan hasil-hasil penelitian yang relevan dengan objek penelitian. Penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, putusan a quo yang memuat kebijakan moderasi pidana mati telah sesuai dengan teori pemidanaan khususnya teori integratif dan teori hak asasi manusia di Indonesia di mana hak hidup tetap dibatasi oleh kewajiban asasi yang diatur dengan undang-undang. Kedua, model kebijakan moderasi pidana mati dalam RKUHP tahun 2015 beberapa di antaranya telah mengakomodasi amanat putusan a quo, seperti penentuan pidana mati di luar pidana pokok, penundaan pidana mati, kemungkinan pengubahan pidana mati menjadi pidana seumur hidup atau penjara paling lama 20 tahun. Selain itu masih menimbulkan persoalan berkaitan dengan lembaga yang memberikan pengubahan pidana mati, persoalan grasi, lamanya penundaan pelaksanaan pidana mati, dan jenis pidana apa saja yang dapat diancamkan pidana mati.Kata kunci: kebijakan, KUHP, moderasi, pidana mati. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court’s Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, in addition to being the basis of the constitutionality of capital punishment, also provides a moderate way of arguing between retentionist groups and those wishing to abolish the death penalty (abolitionist). The problem in this research is how the moderation policy of capital punishment in aquo decision is associated with the theory of punishment and human rights and how the moderation policy of capital punishment in the draft Criminal Code of 2015 (RKUHP) is related with the a quo decision. This study is doctrinal, using primary and secondary legal materials, in the form of legislation, literature and research results that are relevant to the object of analysis. This study concludes, firstly, the aquo decision containing the moderation policy of capital punishment has been in accordance with the theory of punishment, specificallyy the integrative theory and the theory of human rights in Indonesia, in which the right to life remains limited by the fundamental obligations set forth in the law. Secondly, some of the modes of moderation model of capital punishment in RKUHP of 2015 have accommodated the mandate of aquo decision, such as the determination of capital punishment outside the main punishment, postponement of capital punishment, the possibility of converting capital punishment to life imprisonment or imprisonment of 20 years. In addition, it still raises issues regarding the institutions that provide for conversion of capital punishment, pardon matters, length of delay in the execution of capital punishment, and any types of crime punishable by capital punishment. Keywords: policy, criminal code, moderation, capital punishment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document