scholarly journals ANALISIS RASIO DAN ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED (EVA) UNTUK MENILAI KINERJA KEUANGAN PT. HM. SAMPOERNATbk. TAHUN 2014 - 2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-52
Author(s):  
Wakhid Yuliyanto ◽  
Firgian Rafingki

This purpose of this research is to identify the  financial performance based on the result of calculation Analisys Ratio and Economic Value Added ( EVA ) in the financial report of PT. HM. Sampoerna Tbk period 2014 – 2016 because of in every annual report there was un explaining how condition of financial performance of this company .This research it is a quantitative descriptive research. The method used was Analysis Ratio and Economic Value Added (EVA). Analysis Ratio used was Liquidity Ratio (Current Ratio,Quick Ratio,Cash Ratio), Solvability Ratio (Debt to Assests Ratio, Debt to Equity Ratio), Activity Ratio (Inventory Turn Over Ratio, Total Assets Turn Over) and Profitability Ratio (Return On Assest, Return On Equity). For the result of the calculation Analysis Ratio the company in condition good condition of the financial performance if  assess from Liquidity Ratio, Solvability Ratio, Activity Ratio and Profitability Ratio because of the result was over average of a kind industry. Meanwhile the result which is used was EVA in period 2014 – 2016 the result all of them positive value which mean there is value added which is  indication PT. HM. Sampoerna Tbk in good condition of the financial performance. Based on result of the analysis overall financial performance of PT. HM. Sampoerna Tbk. in 2014 – 2016 is good with revenue increase every year. However the company has not maximized fund resources to making a profit.

Author(s):  
Muhammad Fadil Abu Bakar ◽  
Youlanda Hasan

AbstractTo find out financial performance PT. PP (Persero) Tbk.               Data analysis in this study uses quantitative descriptive by comparing the company's financial ratios using the Liquidity Ratio, Solvability Ratio, Activity Ratio, Solvability Ratio               Based on the results of the analysis it can be concluded that the financial performance of PT. PP (Persero) Tbk. in 2014 until 2016 where the liquidity ratio felt in a liquid state because it was in the financial ratio. The solvency ratio is in an unhealthy state, because the debt to equity ratio and debt to asset ratio are below the standard financial ratio. The activity ratio is in good condition, because the receivable turn over and inventory turn over are at the financial ratio standard. The profitability ratio is in an unhealthy state, because the net profit margin and return of investment are below the standard financial ratio.Keywords: Liquidity Ratio, Solvability Ratio, Activity Ratio, Profitability Ratio.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Nangsi Mohamad ◽  
Lanto Miriatin Amali ◽  
Meriyana Franssisca Dungga

Analysis of Financial Performance based on Economic Value Added (EVA) and Financial Value Added (FVA) (Case Study at PT. Nippon Indosari Corpindo Tbk in 2014-2018). Bachelor’s Degree Program in Management, Faculty of Economics, State University of Gorontalo. The principal sepervisior is Lanto Miriatin Amali, S. Sos., M.Si., and the co-supervisor is Meriyana Frsansissca Dungga, SE, MM. The research objective was to find out the financial performance of company based on analysis Economic Value Added (EVA) and Financial Value Added (FVA) from 2014 to 2018 at PT. Nippon Indosari Corpindo Tbk. The research data were obtained through financial statement in Indonesia Stock Exchange in form of company’s annual statement. The research data were secondary data. The research method used quantitative descriptive. The research sample focused on PT. Nippon Indosari Corpindo Tbk at Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The research finding indicated that the result of calculation from economic value added (EVA) and Financial Value Added (FVA) at PT. Nippon Indosari Corindo Tbk listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) fluctuated or limit of economic value added and limit of financial value added were dynamic expriencing movement although the condition of value was dynamic (up-down). Yet the average value of both was > 0 (positive) so that it was assumed to have been able to create economic value added and financial value added.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hamdan Sayadi

<p align="center"><strong>A</strong><strong>BSTRACT</strong></p><p><em>The objective of this research aims to evaluate of financial performance the acquirer company before and after acquisition and company condition after acquisition that being evaluated with Economic Value Added (EVA) method. This study was classified as a descriptive study with case study approach. Data collection was collected by documentation method in the form of annual financial report of PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk. in the period of three years before acquisition and four years after acquisition (2009-2015). </em><em>R</em><em>atio analysis were used as evaluation tools on this research. Ratio analysis used the profitability ratio.</em><em> </em><em>Ratio analysis results showed that profitability ratios have increased after the acquisition.  </em><em>Profit margin ratio before acquisition have increased from 0,06 in 2009 to 0,15 in 2010. Profit margin ratio PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk also have increased after acquisition from 0,15 in 2010 to 0,29 in 2015. Before acquisition, ROA PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk have increased from 0,04 in 2009 to 0,12 in 2010. And then, ROA have decreased to 0,11 after acquisition. ROE PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk have increased before acquisition from 0,06 in 2009 to 0,16 in 2010. But ROE have decreased to 0,12 after acquisition. </em><em>Based on the research results, financial performance of PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk. after acquisition is better than before the acquisition period</em><em>.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords :</em></strong><em> Financial performance, Economic Value Added, Financial ratio</em></p><p align="center"><strong>ABSTRAK</strong></p><p><em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kinerja keuangan perusahaan pengakuisisi sebelum dan setelah akuisisi dan kondisi perusahaan pengakuisisi setelah akuisisi yang dievaluasi dengan menggunakan metode nilai tambah. Studi ini tergolong sebagai penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi berupa laporan keuangan tahunan PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk. periode tiga tahun sebelum dan empat tahun setelah akuisisi (2009-2015). Alat evaluasi yang digunakan ialah analisis rasi. Analisis rasio yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah rasio profitabilitas</em><em>. </em><em>Pada rasio profit margin periode sebelum akuisisi mengalami peningkatan dari 0,06 pada tahun 2009 menjadi 0,15 pada tahun 2010. Profit margin PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk terus mengalami peningkatan pada periode setelah akuisisi hingga mencapai 0,29 pada tahun 2015.</em><em> </em><em>Pada periode sebelum akuisisi nilai ROA mengalami peningkatan dari 0,04 pada tahun 2009 menjadi 0,12 pada tahun 2010. ROA meningkat karena meningkatnya laba bersih sehingga kemampuan pengembalian aktivanya juga menjadi semakin kuat. Akan tetapi pada periode setelah akuisisi ROA perusahaan mengalami penurunan menjadi sebesar 0,11 pada tahun 2015. Penurunan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa efisiensi dan efektivitas pengelolaan aset tidak lebih baik daripada periode sebelum akuisisi.</em><strong><em> </em></strong><em>Pada periode sebelum akuisisi nilai ROE mengalami peningkatan dari 0,06 pada tahun 2009 menjadi 0,16 pada tahun 2010. Akan tetapi pada periode setelah akuisisi ROE perusahaan mengalami penurunan menjadi sebesar 0,12 pada tahun 2015. Peningkatan dan penurunan ROE dikarenakan mengikuti kenaikan dan penurunan laba bersih perusahaan.</em><strong><em> </em></strong><em>Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, kinerja keuangan PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi Tbk setelah akuisisi lebih baik dibandingkan periode sebelum akuisisi.</em></p><strong><em>Kata kunci</em></strong><em>: Kinerja keuangan, Economic Value Added, rasio keuangan.</em>


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Qibtiyah Sugiharto Putri ◽  
Meiril Hardi

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai kinerja keuangan perusahaan dengan menggunakan analisis rasio keuangan dan Economic Value Added (EVA). Obyek dalam penelitian ini adalah PT Primarindo Asia Infrastructure Tbk yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2010-2014. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Teknik analisis data menggunakan metode analisis rasio keuangan dan Economic Value Added (EVA). Analisis rasio keuangan adalah kegiatan membandingkan angka-angka yang ada dalam satu laporan keuangan atau antar laporan keuangan dalam satu periode ataupun beberapa periode tertentu. Rasio yang digunakan adalah rasio likuiditas yaitu rasio lancar dan rasio cepat, rasio solvabilitas yaitu debt ratio dan debt to equity ratio, rasio aktivitas yaitu inventory turn over, fixed assets turn over dan total assets turn over, seta rasio profitabilitas yaitu gross profit margin, nett profit margin, return on investment dan return on equity. Sedangkan Economic Value Added (EVA) adalah pengukuran kinerja keuangan perusahaan yang didasrkan atas pengurangan laba operasional bersih setelah pajak (NOPAT) dengan nilai biaya modal yang digunakan oleh perusahaan. Standar penilaian kinerja dengan menggunakan Economic Value Added (EVA) adalah jika EVA > 0 maka telah terjadi proses nilai tambah ekonomis pada perusahaan, jika EVA = 0 maka menunjukkan posisi impas, dan jika EVA < 0 maka menunjukkan tidak terjadi proses nilai tambah ekonomis bagi perusahaan. Hasil dari penelitian menjelaskan bahwa hasil kinerja keuangan perusahaan diukur menggunakan analisis rasio keuangan dikatakan kurang efektif, karena ekuitas yang bernilai negatif dan persentase masih banyak yang mengalami fluktuatif. Sedangkan hasil dari metode Economic Value Added (EVA) dalam periode 2010-2014 memiliki nilai yang positif (EVA > 0), yang artinya perusahaan berhasil menciptakan nilai tambah ekonomis bagi perusahaan dan pemilik modal. Kata Kunci : Analisis Rasio Keuangan, Economic Value Added (EVA), dan Kinerja Keuangan


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Kamal Hossain ◽  

This study attempts to examine the relationship between shareholding patterns and banks’ financial performance, as defined from three different dimensions, namely, profit-based performance measured by return on equity (ROE), market-based performance measured by Tobin’s Q (TQ) and valuebased performance measured by economic value added (EVA). It included 29 out of the 30 banks listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange for the period 2013–2017, providing a balanced panel with 145 observations. All data were collected from the annual reports of the respective banks. The randomeffects GLS regression model was employed to test the chosen hypotheses. This study found a conflicting result, i.e. there was a relationship between some, but not all of the patterns of shareholdings and financial performance of the listed banks in Bangladesh. For example, a significant relationship between foreign shareholding and banks’ financial performance, as measured by ROE, TQ and EVA-log, was found. Sponsor-directors and general public shareholdings were found to be significantly related to ROE and EVA-log, but insignificantly associated with TQ. However, institutional and government shareholdings were insignificantly related to the banks’ financial performance, regardless of the measures employed to assess it. This study contributes to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between shareholding patterns and banks’ financial performance, and may indicate the need for a restructuring of the existing shareholding patterns in the banking sector in Bangladesh in order to maximise performance. This study is distinctive compared to prior studies, as it examines the relationship between the shareholding patterns disclosed in the annual reports of the sampled banks and banks’ performance, as measured by EVA-log along with ROE and TQ, which have not been covered earlier. KEYWORDS: Shareholding patterns, Financial performance, Economic value added, Banking sector in Bangladesh


Author(s):  
Dwi Urip Wardoyo

This study aims to compare financial performance through profitability generated by two market participants in the witness transportation service industry in Jakarta, namely PT. BB compared to PT. ETU, this assessment is measured not limited to the profit generated but more than that by measuring financial added value through the concept of Eonomic Value Added produced by the two companies. The population in this study were all taxi transportation service companies in Jakarta. The sampling method selected two taxi companies that have the largest market share in DKI Jakarta, namely BB Taxi and ETU Taxi. The test analysis used in this study is ratio analysis through profit calculation and economic added value from the annual income statement. This study shows that there are (a) determination of the ratio of profit levels, (b) Determination of the comparison of economic value added of the two companies. Keywords :  Financial performance, Economic Value Added (EVA)


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wikan Budi Utami

Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh EVA, ROA dan ROE terhadap return pemegang saham.Sampel yang diambil dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta (BEJ) yang tercantum dalam Indonesian Capital Market Directory dan internet dengan situs www.jsx.co.id sejak tahun 2006 sampai dengan 2008. Sampel penelitian ditentukan berdasarkan purposive sampling. Dalam penelitian ini uji asumsi klasik yang digunakan adalah: uji normalitas, uji Autokorelasi, uji Multikolinearitas, uji Heterokedastisitas, Uji Regresi (Uji f dan t).Pengujian hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji f, uji t dan uji R2. Hasil uji F diperoleh nilai Fhitung sebesar 1,226 dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,317. Karena nilai signifikansi F lebih besar dari 0,05 maka disimpulkan tidak ada pengaruh simultan antara variabel Economic Value Added (EVA), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) terhadap Return Saham.Hasil uji t diperoleh variabel EVA memiliki tingkat signifikansi lebih dari 0,05 yaitu sebesar 0,100. Dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,100 yang lebih besar dari 0,05 disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial Economic Value Added (EVA) tidak berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham perusahaan. Variabel ROA memiliki tingkat signifikansi lebih besar dari 0,05 yaitu sebesar 0,789. Dengan tingkat signifikansi 0,789 lebih besar dari 0,05 disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial Return on Asset tidak berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham perusahaan. Variabel ROE memiliki tingkat signifikansi lebih dari 0,05 yaitu sebesar 0,689. Dengan tingkat signifikansi sebesar 0,689 yang lebih besar dari 0,05 disimpulkan bahwa secara parsial Return on Equity (ROE) tidak berpengaruh terhadap Return Saham perusahaanHasil uji koefisien determinasi diperoleh nilai R2 sebesar 0,109 atau 10,9%. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa 10,9% dari nilai variabel dependen yaitu Return Saham dapat dijelaskan oleh Economic Value Added (EVA), Return on Assets (ROA) dan Return on Equity (ROE) sedangkan sisa nilai variabel dependen yaitu  sebesar 89,1% tidak dapat dijelaskan oleh persamaan regresi atau dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak termasuk dalam model analisis.Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberi masukan bagi investor dalam melakukan invetasi saham dengan tidak hanya melihat kondisi perusahaan melalui rasio keuangan, khususnya melalui rasio EVA, ROA dan ROE tapi dengan rasio lain sebagai penentu investasi.Kata kunci: Economic Value Added (EVA), Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE) dan Return Saham


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-303
Author(s):  
Venni Agnatia ◽  
Diah Amalia

The purpose of this research is to analyze the effect of Economic Value Added (EVA) and profitability ratios partially and simultaneously to the coal mining company’s stock price. The profitability ratios used in this research as independent variable are Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Return on Investment (ROI) and Net Profit Margin (NPM) although the stock price as the dependent variable. The samples used were 14 companies from 25 coal mining companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2011-2017 so total data processed is 98 samples. This research used linear regression analysis with Eviews version 9. The result indicated that partially the variable ROA and ROI has significant positive effect on stock price. EVA, ROE and NPM does not affect the stock price. All variables simultaneously affect to the stock price.   Keyword: EVA, ROA, ROE, ROI, NPM, Stock Price


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-45
Author(s):  
Ferry Irawan ◽  
Nico Yudha Manurung

PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk was one of the state-owned corporation that have go public on Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). As a public company, PT Garuda Indonesia should create a good financial performance to attract financier (investor or creditor). The purpose of this study were to measure the financial performance by Economic Value Added (EVA) and Market Value Added (MVA). The result of this study is the company get a negative EVA in 2017 until 2019 which mean the company was not able to create value added for financier. In 2017 and 2018, MVA get a negative value which mean the company was not able to create value added for investor. In 2019, MVA get a positive value because the company’s stock price increased 73% from previous year.PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk merupakan salah satu Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) yang telah go public di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Sebagai perusahaan terbuka, PT Garuda Indonesia Tbk harus menciptakan kinerja keuangan yang baik untuk menarik pemodal (investor atau kreditur). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur kinerja keuangan dengan Economic Value Added (EVA) dan Market Value Added (MVA). Hasil penelitian ini adalah perusahaan memperoleh nilai EVA yang negatif pada 2017-2019 yang berarti perusahaan tidak berhasil menciptakan nilai tambah bagi para pemodal. Pada 2017 dan 2018, MVA memperoleh nilai yang negatif yang berarti perusahaan gagal menciptakan nilai tambah pagi para investor. Pada 2019, MVA memperoleh nilai yang positif karena harga saham perusahaan yang meningkat sebesar 73% dari tahun sebelumnya.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document