scholarly journals A legal right to die: responding to slippery slope and abuse arguments

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Benatar
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Richards

This article explores the activities and convictions of older right-to-die activists who belong to a small but very active interest group based in Scotland, UK, called Friends at the End (FATE). The analysis presented here is based on knowledge gained through seventeen months of ethnographic research with the organisation. While FATE activists currently campaign for a legal right to a medically assisted death, many are also open to taking matters into their own hands, either by travelling to the Swiss organisation Dignitas or by opting for what is known as ’’self-deliverance’’. FATE members’ openness to different means of securing a hastened death contrasts sharply with the more limited demands of the UK’s main right-to-die organisation, Dignity in Dying, and highlights their specific orientation to freedom, which, it is argued here, results from the organisation’s older demographic.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-403
Author(s):  
Jennifer Jane Hardes

This article examines the operation of “enmity” in right to die legal appeals. The article asks: (1) why does the law rely on articulations of enmity to rationalize its decisions and (2) what might this tell us about how biopolitics operates in the contemporary neoliberal moment? Drawing on the insight of Roberto Esposito the article makes three key points. First, it notes that biopolitics operating in the contemporary neoliberal moment is increasingly focused on closures around individual human subjects, or what Esposito calls mechanisms of “immunization.” Second, it notes that discourses of enmity are perpetuated through legal right to die appeals that shore up these immunity mechanisms, which can partly explain why right to die claims fail on appeal. Finally, it considers more affirmative ways forward in both theory and practice relating to legal right to die appeals.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Benatar
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Arras ◽  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anindita Mukherjee
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Robin D. G. Kelley

Few activists who march behind the banner of Black Lives Matter conceive of their struggle as an appeal to white people for recognition, but until recently the movement’s objective echoed this implicit line of reasoning: if the dominant class, and/or the state, could just recognize that our lives matter, we would be treated differently. Such assumptions can easily lead us down a slippery slope of reducing five centuries of racism, slavery, and colonialism to a fixed ideology of anti-Blackness intrinsic to the European mind, or worse, mistaking a dynamic racial regime for negligence, ignorance, or “blindness” to our humanity, a humanity that requires a visible struggle to be seen. They can lead, that is to say, to a politics in which recognition takes precedence over revolution and reconstruction.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-180
Author(s):  
Constance E. Putnam
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document