The Two-Dimensional CCSMM

The community cyber security maturity model (CCSMM) defines four dimensions and five implementation mechanisms in describing the relative maturity of an organization or an SLTT's cybersecurity program. These are used in defining levels of maturity and the cybersecurity characteristics of an organization or SLTT at each level. In order to progress from one level to the next, a variety of activities should take place, and these are defined in terms of five different mechanisms. In between two levels are a variety of activities that should take place to help the entity to advance from one level to the next. These groups of activities describe four phases, each of which takes place between two levels. Thus, Phase 1 defines the activities that should occur for an entity to advance from Level 1 to Level 2.

2022 ◽  
pp. 140-155
Author(s):  
Gregory B. White ◽  
Natalie Sjelin

The community cyber security maturity model (CCSMM) defines four dimensions and five implementation mechanisms in describing the relative maturity of an organization or an SLTT's cybersecurity program. These are used in defining levels of maturity and the cybersecurity characteristics of an organization or SLTT at each level. In order to progress from one level to the next, a variety of activities should take place, and these are defined in terms of five different mechanisms. In between two levels are a variety of activities that should take place to help the entity to advance from one level to the next. These groups of activities describe four phases, each of which takes place between two levels. Thus, Phase 1 defines the activities that should occur for an entity to advance from Level 1 to Level 2.


Respati ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Ita Permatahati ◽  
Wing Wahyu Winarno ◽  
Mei P Kurniawan

INTISARIMenerapkan standarisasi pada suatu perusahaan yang bergerak dibidang pengembangan perangkat lunak merupakan salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan kualitasnya. CMMI merupakan salah satu standarisasi yang penulis pilih untuk mengetahui tingkat kematangan dari divisi Innovation CenterAmikom. CMMI yang digunakan ialah CMMI for Development versi 1.3 yang fokus terhadap tingkat kematangan di level 2 dengan 6 proses area. Penelitian ini mengambil 1 sample proyek di Innovation Center(IC) yaitu apliksai presensi berbasis mobile. Berdasarkan hasil dari pengukuran yang telah dilakukan, proses pengembangan lunak di IC berada di tingkat 1 (Initial) yang diketahui bahwa belum semua praktik yang ada di masing-masing 6 proses area diterapkan. Kata kunci— proses pengembangan perangkat lunak, CMMI, CMMI-DEV, Representasi Bertingkat, Tingkat Kematangan. ABSTRACTApplying standards to a company engaged in the development of devices is one way to improve its quality. CMMI is one of the standards chosen by the author to find out the level of maturity of the Innovation Center at Amikom. CMMI is used for CMMI for Development version 1.3 which focuses on the level of maturity at level 2 with 6 process areas. This study took 1 sample project at the Innovation Center (IC), a mobile-based presence application. Based on the results of the measurements that have been made, the development process at the IC is at level 1 (Initial) related to all the practices that exist in each of the 6 process areas that are applied.Kata kunci—  software development process, CMMI, CMMI-DEV, Leveled Representation, Maturity Level.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi28-vi28
Author(s):  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Martin Nicholas ◽  
Richard Peterson ◽  
Oana Danciu ◽  
Stefania Maraka ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Procaspase activating compound -1 (PAC-1) is a small molecule that catalyzes conversion of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 which induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Glioblastoma (GBM) is among the tumors with high concentrations of procaspase-3 and low levels of caspase-3. PAC-1 crosses the blood brain barrier and has been shown to synergize with temozolomide (TMZ) in canine malignant glioma and meningioma that arise spontaneously. METHODS This is a multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation study to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PAC-1 administered days 1–21 in combination with TMZ days 8–12 at a dose of 150 mg/m2 of each 28 day cycle in subjects with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or GBM. A modified Fibonacci 3 + 3 design is used with up to 4 dose levels of PAC-1 (375, 500, 625 and 750 mg/day). Neurologic toxicity, including cognitive function, is closely monitored throughout the trial. INTERIM DATA: A total of 14 subjects have been enrolled to-date. Of these, 7 at dose level 1, PAC-1 375 mg/day (6 GBM, 1 AA; median age 58y, range 25–75) and 7 at dose level 2, PAC-1 500 mg/day (5 GBM, 2 AA; median age 51y, range 35–60). Best responses to-date were 2 subjects with a partial response and 2 with stable disease. Grade 3 (hepatotoxicity) and 4 (cerebral edema) was reported as possibly related to PAC-1 in 1 patient at dose level 1. The median number of cycles received was 4 (range, 1–12+) at dose level 1 and 2 (range, 1–3) at dose level 2. Enrollment to dose level 2 has been completed and data analysis is ongoing. Updated response and toxicity as well as pharmacokinetic data will be presented.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4343-4343
Author(s):  
Tara L Chen ◽  
Elihu H. Estey ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Kelda M. Gardner ◽  
Lauren Markle ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4343 Background: Outcomes in relapsed/refractory AML are dismal. Given the high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR), many clinical studies have tested whether MDR reversal agents such as cyclosporine (CSA) could increase the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutics but results have been inconsistent. More recently, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (e.g. pravastatin) have been investigated after demonstration that cholesterol synthesis inhibition can restore chemosensitivity of AML cells in vitro. As studies further suggested the HMG-CoA inhibitors could downregulate MDR function, we attempted to improve the efficacy of mitoxantrone and etoposide in patients with relapsed/persistent AML by combining CSA and pravastatin in a single-arm, open-label phase 1/2 trial. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with relapsed/refractory non-APL AML and a treatment-related mortality score of <9.2 (Walter et al. J Clin Oncol 2011) were eligible if they had an ECOG performance status (PS) ≤3 and adequate organ function. Prior hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was permissible if relapse occurred >180 days post-HCT. Planned treatment included induction and consolidation therapy with pravastatin, CSA, and increasing doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide. All patients received pravastatin 320mg PO every 6 hours on days 1–10. The starting dose level (level 1) used etoposide 60mg/m2/day and mitoxantrone 5mg/m2/day via continuous infusion on days 5–9. CSA started 6 hours before the first doses of mitoxantrone/etoposide; after loading with 6mg/kg over 2 hours and 4mg/kg over 6 hours, CSA was infused at 18mg/kg/day on days 5–9. CSA levels were monitored on Day 6 and 8 to maintain levels <2,400ng/mL (by LCMS-MS). At dose level 2, identical doses of pravastatin and CSA were combined with etoposide (80mg/m2/day) and mitoxantrone (6mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as: 1) any Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours except of febrile neutropenia (FN), infection, or hyperbilirubinemia; and 2) any Grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity except FN/infection, constitutional symptoms if recovery to Grade ≤2 within 14 days, and hyperbilirubinemia. An “adaptive” Bayesian phase 1–2 design that monitored both toxicity and response was used. The maximal acceptable rate of toxicity was 30%, the minimum acceptable rate of efficacy 20% (historical rate of 15% in this population), stopping when posterior probability >90%. A maximum of 45 patients would be treated in cohorts of 3. Results: Between October 2010 and February 2012, 10 patients (median age 52 [range 40–58] years) were treated, including 4 patients (all at dose level 1) who received therapy off protocol. Two patients had secondary AML, and 6 had complex cytogenetics. PS was 1 (7 patients) or 2 (3 patients). Average TRM score was 4.32 for on-study patients. All patients had received at least 2 prior regimens, and 7 received 3 prior therapies. One patient had undergone HCT. The average CSA level on Day 6 was 1,366.3ng/mL (range 713–2,082ng/mL) and 1,199.8ng/mL on Day 8 (range 526–1,593ng/mL). Efficacy (CR or CRi)/DLTs for on-study patients were: level 1 (n=3): 0/1 (grade 4 acute kidney injury); level 2 (n=3): 0/2 (grade 4 acute kidney injury; sepsis/multiorgan failure). Among the 7 patients treated at level 1, other toxicities included septic shock (n=1), FN (4), mucositis (2), and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (1). One off-study patient achieved CR after 1 course and received 1 cycle of consolidation with pravastatin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone but experienced CNS relapse after CR duration of only 46 days. Based on the results of the on-study patients, the statistical monitoring mandated early study closure for lack of efficacy & excessive toxicity. Conclusion: In the targeted, heavily pretreated patient population, the study regimen was excessively toxic and failed to achieve acceptable efficacy. Further clinical testing, if any, should be limited to less heavily pretreated, otherwise “fit” patients with AML. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01342887. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3708-3708
Author(s):  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Thomas Eugene ◽  
Nelly Robillard ◽  
Françoise Isnard ◽  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Prognosis of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults is dismal. CD22 is highly expressed in patients with B-ALL. Epratuzumab (hLL2) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD22 surface antigen. We performed a standard 3+3 phase 1 study to assess the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of a 90yttrium-labeled anti-CD22 epratuzumab tetraxetan (90Y-DOTA-hLL2) radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in adults with refractory/relapsed CD22+ B-ALL. Methods: After premedication with corticosteroid, 90Y-DOTA-hLL2 was administered twice on days 1 and 8 (+2), successively at 2.5 (level 1), 5.0 (level 2), 7.5 (level 3), and 10.0 (level 4) mCi/m². The first two patients also received 4 infusions of DOTA-hLL2 360 mg/m²/day before the RIT. This “cold phase” was terminated after observing no efficacy and full saturation of the CD22 target on the leukemic cells. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed either by flow cytometry or by RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL1 analyses in Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) B-ALL patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any non-reversible grade >3 non-hematological toxicity or grade 4 pancytopenia with hypocellular bone marrow lasting for >6 weeks. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level at which 2 of 3 or 2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. Dosimetry, organ distribution and elimination of the radiotracer were studied between the two RIT infusions in all but one patient, using whole-body scintigraphy recorded after 111Indium-epratuzumab tetraxetan injection and blood pharmacokinetics. Patients were evaluated for response between 4 and 6 weeks following the first infusion of RIT. Findings: Between October 2011 and June 2014, 20 patients were enrolled. Three patients were not considered for analyses because of disease progression (n=2) or persistent non-blastic pancytopenia (n=1) before RIT. Overall, 17 cases were treated (5 at level 1 including 2 previously treated with the cold phase, 3 at level 2, 3 at level 3, and 6 at level 4). There were 10 males and 7 females with a median age of 62 years (range: 27-77). Two patients had primary refractory B-ALL; 10, 3 and 2 were in first, second or third relapse, respectively. Median percentage of blasts in the bone marrow was 75%. Karyotypes were as follows: Ph+ B-ALL n=6, complex n=3, MLL rearrangement n=1, hyperdiploidy n=1, hypodiploidy n=1, near-triploidy n=1, del4q (+ikaros mutation) n=1, normal (but ikaros mutation) n=1, and unknown n=2. Four patients were previously allotransplanted. Median interval between diagnosis and RIT was 16.5 months. Five patients presented immediate infusion reactions (3 grade 1, 1 grade 2 and 1 grade 3 in a patient with a previous history of severe allergic reactions) after the first RIT infusion, but received the second infusions without toxicities. All examined patients showed expected uptake of the radiotracer on potential disease sites (blood, spleen, liver, and bone marrow). No response was seen at levels 1 and 3. One molecular complete response was documented at level 2 (54-year old woman in third relapse of Ph+ B-ALL). At level 4, 2 patients achieved complete remissions (1 Ph+ ALL and 1 Ph- ALL), while all 6 cases presented with grade 4 hematologic toxicity. One DLT was documented at level 4 (non-blastic pancytopenia lasting 8 weeks), but MTD was not reached. Two patients in response received a second RIT cycle. Currently, only one non-responder is alive, while 2 of 3 responders are alive. One relapsed at 1 year and died of progression (level 2), while the two remaining are in persistent CR at 6 months post RIT, with low positive MRD. Interpretation: 90Y-DOTA-hLL2 RIT is well-tolerated and induced complete remissions even in heavily pre-treated CD22+ relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients, thus appearing to be a promising targeted therapy for CD22+ B-ALL. We recommend the dose of 10 mCi/m² given twice, one week apart/cycle, for phase 2 studies. The trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct no.NCT01354457. Funding: Immunomedics, Inc. Disclosures Goldenberg: immunomedics: Employment. Wegener:immunomedics: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2816-2816
Author(s):  
Frederick Lansigan ◽  
Stuart Seropian ◽  
Dennis L. Cooper ◽  
Von Potter ◽  
Noelle Sowers ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2816 Background: Vorinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor with activity in lymphoma and leukemia. Vorinostat has been reported to act synergistically with topoisomeraseII inhibitors such as anthracyclines (Ac) by facilitating an open chromatin configuration thus enhancing double-strand DNA breaks and apoptosis. We conducted a phase 1 study of escalating doses of vorinostat with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (V+PLD) in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Other endpoints included safety, tolerability, and activity of V+PLD. Methods: Patients age ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory lymphoma were enrolled sequentially into 1 of 3 dosing levels using a standard 3+3 design for up to 8 cycles. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, good clinical practice and regulatory guidelines. Vorinostat 200 (dose level 1), 300 (dose level 2), or 400mg (dose level 3) twice daily on days 1–7 and PLD 30mg/m2 on day 3 of a 21-day cycle were administered to eligible and consenting patients. CTCAE v.3.0 was used to determine toxicities, and the revised criteria for malignant lymphoma were used to determine response. Results: 14 patients have been enrolled; 2 men and 12 women; median age 69 years [range 27–88]; median prior therapies (4) [1-11]; prior Ac (13); median prior Ac dose (300mg/m2) [108-440mg/m2]; prior HDACi (1); Dose level 1 (7); Dose level 2 (4); Dose level 3 (3). Lymphoma subtypes included: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL)(4), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (3), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)(5), grey zone lymphoma (1), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (1). Median number of study cycles was two [1-8](2). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included: neutropenia (3) and thrombocytopenia (1). Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included: fatigue (2), nausea (1), anorexia (1), dehydration (1), AST/ALT elevation (1), amylase/lipase elevation (1). No cardiac toxicities were observed. There was one death attributed to disease progression. Partial responses (PR) were documented in two HL patients, stable disease (SD) in one HL and one DLBCL patient. Three patients continued therapy beyond 2 cycles. One HL patient with a PR tolerated 8 cycles despite a prior anthracycline dose of 350mg/m2 and 9 prior systemic treatments including ABVD, ICE, GND, DICEP, BEAM and autologous stem cell transplant, Gem and C-MOPP. Another HL patient with a PR after 2 cycles is currently on cycle 3 at dose level 3 and had 5 prior treatments including autologous transplant. One other HL patient with SD discontinued therapy after 2 cycles to proceed with alternative chemotherapy including allogeneic stem cell transplant. One patient with cutaneous DLBCL obtained a skin response but had overall stable disease and completed 6 cycles before disease progression; prior treatment included R-CHOP, R-ICE, CEPP, and GemOx. In addition, one patient with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma had a clinical response after 1 cycle but therapy was discontinued because of neutropenia and her disease progressed. Conclusions: The combination of V+PLD is well tolerated even among older and heavily pretreated patients. There were no cardiac toxicities even in patients heavily pretreated with anthracyclines. The MTD has not been reached and enrollment to dose level 3 is ongoing. Disease control was achieved in 4 of 14 patients (2 PR and 2 SD). Of interest, 3 of 4 patients with HL achieved disease control (2 PR and one SD), and treatment with vorinostat in combination with anthracycline-based therapy warrants further investigation in HL. Disclosures: Lansigan: Merck: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Vorinostat in combination with pegylated doxorubicin is considered experimental in lymphoma. Foss:Merck: Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Lichtenberg ◽  
Sander Slijkhuis ◽  
Mourad Hamidouche ◽  
Melanie Coldewey-Egbers ◽  
Bernd Aberle ◽  
...  

&lt;p&gt;The Fundamental Data Record for ATMOSpheric Composition (FDR4ATMOS) project is part of the ESA Long Term Data Preservation (LTDP) programme aimed at the preservation and valorization of data assets from ESA&amp;#8217;s Earth Observation (EO) Heritage Missions. It has two objectives. The first one is to update the SCIAMACHY processing chain for better Ozone total column data. After the full re-processing of the SCIAMACHY mission with the updated processor versions 9 (Level 1) and version 7 (Level 2), ground-based validation showed that the total Ozone column drifted downward by nearly 2% over the mission lifetime. This drift is likely caused by changes in the degradation correction in the Level 1 processor, that led to subtle changes in the spectral structures. These are misinterpreted as an atmospheric signature. FDR4ATMOS will update the Level 0-1 processor accordingly with the final aim of a mission re-processing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main objective of the FDR4ATMOS project is to develop a cross-instrument Level 1 product for GOME-1 and SCIAMACHY for the UV, VIS and NIR spectral range, with focus on the spectral windows used for O3, SO2, NO2 total column retrieval and the determination of cloud properties. Contrary to other projects, FDR4ATMOS does not aim to build harmonised time series based on Level 2 products (geophysical parameters) but to build a Fundamental Data Record (FDR) of Level 1 products, i.e. radiances and reflectances. The GOME-1 and SCIAMACHY instruments together span 17 years of spectrally highly resolved data essential for air quality, climate, ozone trend and UV radiation applications. The goal of the FDR4ATMOS project is to generate harmonised data sets that allow the user to use it directly in long-term trend analysis, independently of the instrument. Since this was never done for highly resolved spectrometers, new methods have to be developed that e.g. take into account the different observation geometries and observation times of the instrument without impacting the spectral structures that are used for the retrieval of the atmospheric species. The resulting algorithms and the processor should also be as generic as possible to be able to easily transfer the methodology to other instruments (e.g. GOME-2 and Sentinel-5p) for a future extension of the time series. The project will support new applications and services and will enhance traceability of satellite-derived data with improved uncertainty estimates based on rigorous metrological principles.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FDR4ATMOS started in October 2019 and is currently in phase 1. We will present the motivation, goals and first results of the project.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


Since in the recent years the architecture software have completely changed the work of architects, today, the architects begin to use software to achieve every kind of design that they are working for from the very beginning until the end. As presented in this paper, the choice of architectural software depends on the specific needs of the designs ranging from two-dimensional design to three-dimensional or BIM technologies. Since some architects prefer to use different software specific for the design that they are working on and they combine the results to produce the intended ultimate result, while some prefer only one software for the entire work, in this paper, it has been attempted to cover both cases.The main aim of this paper is to introduce the most used architectural and building design software from two-dimensional to BIM technologies to cover the needs of architects in the presentation and design of buildings. Twelve architectural and building design software were selected and classified depending on the purpose of their application. The selected software have been analyzed according to the BIM levels, and most commonly used software in every BIM level and their advantages and disadvantages are presented. Two software from BIM level 0, three software from BIM level 1, and four software from BIM level 2, together with 3 software for the design of buildings, a total of twelve software have been selected and technically described by giving the technical specifications, characteristics, application domains, limitation, technical popularity and capabilities that can be a complete guideline for architects and building designers to choose the suitable software to be applied in architectural and building design professions. Finally for the architectural presentation the software of BIM level 0 (AutoCAD LT and DraftSight), BIM level 1 (AutoCAD Architecture, Chief Architect and TurboCAD), BIM level 2 (ArchiCAD, Revit, Vectorworks Architect and Allplan Architecture), and for the buildings design the CSI software packages (SAP 2000, ETABS and SAFE) and STAAD.PRO software are recommended to be employed.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2802-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Luis F Porrata ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Joseph P Colgan ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2802 Background: Redundancy of pro-survival signaling pathways promotes survival and drug resistance in lymphoid and plasma cell malignancies. In particular, the PI3K-Akt and the MEK-ERK pathways have been shown to play an important role in the proliferation and survival of these malignant cells induced by various cytokines in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib, a Raf kinase and VEGF receptor inhibitor, and everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, have synergistic cytotoxicity in myeloma and lymphoma cells due to inhibition of multiple signaling pathways. Methods: We designed a Phase 1/2 clinical trial to identify the maximum tolerated doses of the two drugs used in combination and the efficacy of the combination. Patients (Pts) with relapsed myeloma or lymphoma were eligible for enrollment. Pts were required to have an absolute neutrophil count ≥1500 × 10(6)/L, a platelet count ≥75,000, and a serum creatinine 21.5 mg/dL. The study utilized the classic 3+3 design. Extensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed to better delineate potential drug interactions. Results: Twenty-six pts were accrued from August 2007 to February 2009. Four pts discontinued sorafenib during cycle 1 for various reasons (2 patient refusal, 1 unrelated medical condition and 1 physician discretion) and were excluded from MTD determination. An additional pt did not have measurable disease and was ineligible, leaving 19 pts with lymphoma (including 6 with Hodgkin lymphoma) and 2 with myeloma for phase I analysis. The pts had a median age of 56 years (range, 22, 69) and were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). Eighteen (86%) had received a prior stem cell transplant. Four dose limiting toxicities were seen across all dose levels (Table). These included grade 3 vomiting (level 1), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (level 2 and 3, one each) and grade 2 hand and foot rash leading to treatment delay (level 3). Overall, 13 pts experienced a grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19%, 43%, and 38% of pts, respectively. Four pts have experienced a grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity; no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included hypokalemia, weight loss, vomiting, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue, and elevated alkaline phosphatase. Dose level 1 (sorafenib 200 mg and everolimus 5 mg daily) was best tolerated and was selected for phase 2 evaluation. The ORR was 33% (7/21;95% CI: 15–57%, Table) with 3 pts at dose level 0 (2 PR, 1 CR), one at level 2 (1 PR) and three at level 3 (2 PR, 1 CR) responding. The responders included 5 pts with Hodgkin's disease and one each with an NK cell and T-cell lymphoma. Pts have received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1–19) of treatment. 16 pts have discontinued treatment due to disease progression (13 pts), non-resolution of cytopenias (1 pt), physician discretion (1 pt), and death on study due to lymphoma (1 pt). Disease progression has been seen in 16 pts; 9 pts have died. Median follow-up for pts still alive is 18.7 months (range: 11.5–29.4). 6 pts died from disease progression, one each due to sepsis unlikely related to treatment, cholecystitis, and unknown causes. Sorafenib is metabolized by the cytochrome P450 CYP3A enzyme and RAD-001 mainly by the CYP3A4 system in the liver, hence there is a potential for interactions. The detailed PK analyses performed as part of this trial showed a decrease in the RAD001 levels following initiation of sorafenib on day 8 of cycle 1 (Figure). Conclusion: The combination of sorafenib and everolimus is safe at a recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib 200 mg and everolimus 5 mg daily. There is no significant drug interaction seen. Activity has been observed, especially in the setting of Hodgkins Disease. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. Witzig:Novartis and Celgene: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding, Served on advisory boards with Novartis and Celgene – both uncompensated with compensation to Mayo Clinic.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lígia de Oliveira Franzosi ◽  
Carla Cristina Amodio Estorilio

Abstract Food companies have been seeking certification of their Product Development Processes (PDP) as a symbol of quality, however, few are prepared to obtain it. One of the hypotheses is that some companies are not mature enough to obtain this certification and maintain it in the long term. To guarantee the product quality, it is important that all the activities responsible for the PDP are aligned, integrated, measured and controlled, thus characterizing the PDP maturity. Therefore, the aim of this work is to analyze the PDP maturity level of the food industry to identify the compatibility with the situation of their Quality Certifications. For this, an adapted method of the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) is used to measure the company’s maturity, seeking also to identify the status of their certifications. Information was collected from five companies in the food industry, which presented consistency between their certifications and maturity levels; four are level 1 and have no certification and one is level 2 and is certified by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document