Abstract
The key to the safe and efficient longwall mining of steeply dipping seams lies in the stability control of the "support-surrounding rock" system. This paper analyzes the difficulty of controlling the stability of the support during the longwall mining process of steeply dipping coal seams in terms of the characteristics of the non-uniform filled-in gob using a combination of physical test, theoretical analysis and field measurements. Considering the floor as an elastic foundation, we built a "support-surrounding rock" mechanical model based on data obtained on "support-surrounding rock" systems in different regions and the laws of support motion under different load conditions. Our findings are summarized as follows. First, depending on the angle of the coal seam, the caving gangue will roll (slide) downward along the incline, resulting in the formation of a non-uniform filling zone in the deep gob in which the lower, middle, and upper sections are filled, half-filled, and empty, respectively. In addition, an inverted triangular hollow surface is formed on the floor of the gob in the middle and upper sections behind the support. Furthermore, as the angle of the coal seam, length of the working face, and mining height increase, the characteristics of the non-uniform filled-in gob are enhanced. Second, we found that, as a result of support by the gangue, the "support-surrounding rock" system is relatively stable in the lower part of the working face while, in the middle and upper sections of the working face, the contact method and loading characteristics of the support are more complicated, making stability control difficult. Third, the magnitude and direction of the load, action point, and mining height all affect the stability of the support to varying degrees, with the tangential load and action position of the roof load having the most significant impacts on the stability of the support. Under loading by the roof, rotation and subsidence of the support inevitably occur, with gradually increasing amplitude and effects on the inter-support and sliding forces. Finally, we found that it is advisable in the process of moving the support to adopt "sliding advance of support" measures and to apply a "down-up" removal order to ensure overall stability. These research results provide reference and guidance of significance to field practice production.