Evaluation of the E-Commerce Website Based on ANP

2010 ◽  
Vol 439-440 ◽  
pp. 743-748
Author(s):  
Bao Zhu Li ◽  
Ran Bi ◽  
Qing Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Index System ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Application Process ◽  
The Index System ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Traditional Evaluation

The index system of the E-commerce websites is qualitative, but almost all of them are lack of weights. This paper built a reasonable index system and used the decision-making method ANP to improve the traditional evaluation method. Theoretical foundations and application process of ANP were discussed; dependence and feedback among indices were analyzed. A case study was done by using the Super Decisions software, the result of which can be used for decision-makers.

Evaluation of the Environmental Logistics Performance Based on the Analytic Network Process

2010 ◽  
Vol 439-440 ◽  
pp. 760-765
Author(s):  
Jin Yu Wei ◽  
Ting Yuan ◽  
Ran Bi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Index System ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Traditional Evaluation

Environmental logistics was paid great attention as the results of the rapid developments of society and economy, and threats of the materials and environment. Many experts have studied the environmental logistics, but few of them do evaluation on it. This paper built a reasonable index system and used the decision-making method ANP to improve the traditional evaluation method. The ANP is a method with dependence and feedback and was done in the paper by using the Super Decisions software, the report of which can do a favor for the related decision-makers.

Evaluation on Comprehensive Protective of Protective Engineering Based on Input-Output DEA Model of Two Goals

2014 ◽  
Vol 496-500 ◽  
pp. 2768-2774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Yong Liu ◽  
Huai Xiao Wang ◽  
Ling Li ◽  
Cheng Qun Fu
Keyword(s):  
Index System ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
System Model ◽  
Input Output ◽  
Dea Model ◽  
The Index System ◽  
Traditional Evaluation

In order to solve the problem that the subjectivity of traditional evaluation method and difficulty of testing correlation on comprehensive protective of protective engineering, this message establishes the index system model of comprehensive protective of protective engineering and input-output DEA model of two goals. Based on this, the input-output DEA model of two goals is used to evaluate the comprehensive protective of protective engineering. The example shows that the method in this passage makes effort to compare the DMUs effectively and select the best DMU.

scholarly journals Flexibility Transformation Decision-Making Evaluation of Coal-Fired Thermal Power Units Deep Peak Shaving in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1882
Author(s):  
Jianjun Wang ◽  
Jikun Huo ◽  
Shuo Zhang ◽  
Yun Teng ◽  
Li Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Index System ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Evaluation Index System ◽  
Auxiliary Equipment ◽  
Peak Shaving ◽  
The Index System ◽  
The Impact ◽  
One Machine

According to China’s economic green ecological sustainability development requirement, the energy reform of China is mainly increasing the proportion of renewable energy, and reducing the proportion of fossil energy. It will continue to force China’s thermal power units, especially coal-fired thermal power units, to carry out the flexibility transformation and upgrading of deep peak shaving ability. Due to the different characteristics of coal-fired thermal power units, it is necessary to make flexible transformation decisions by a scientific and reasonable decision-making evaluation method, so as to provide references for the one machine-one policy flexibility transformation of thermal power units. In this paper, a decision-making evaluation index system for the flexibility transformation of coal-fired thermal power units under the demand of deep peak shaving is established. The index system considers the impact of deep peak shaving on the boilers, steam turbines, and auxiliary equipment of coal-fired thermal power units, as well as the effects of the peak shaving. A hybrid evaluation method combined set-valued iteration and GRA-TOPSIS is employed to obtain the weight of the indexes. Finally, an empirical research was conducted based on the index system and the hybrid evaluation method and targeted “one machine, one policy” recommendations were put forward for the flexibility transformation of the coal-fired thermal power units.

scholarly journals Research on Utility Evaluation of Grid Investment considering Risk Preference of Decision-Makers

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Hongliang Wu ◽  
Daoxin Peng ◽  
Ling Wang
Keyword(s):  
Index System ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Risk Preference ◽  
System Optimization ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Evaluation Index System ◽  
Evaluation Index ◽  
Risk Appetite ◽  
Utility Evaluation ◽  
The Index System

Effectiveness evaluations are one of the important ways to guide grid investment and to improve investment efficiency. Improving the effectiveness of grid investment evaluations is studied based on the optimization of the investment evaluation index system and the utility evaluation model. The index system is optimized by establishing an evaluation index system of grid investment effectiveness, considering the redundancy between the indices, and constructing an ISM-DEA model. The utility function model was introduced to fully consider the different risk appetites of decision-makers, and a utility evaluation model that takes risk appetite into account was established. An improved weight integration model based on multiobjective optimization was established by considering the minimum deviation and the trend-optimal objective function when setting the index weights. The calculation results show that the feasibility of the index system optimization model and utility evaluation model constructed in this study is verified under the premise of satisfying the assumptions. By adjusting the risk preference coefficient of decision-makers, the dynamic optimization of the grid investment utility evaluation results can be realized.

Integration between knowledge management and business process management and its impact on the decision making process in the construction sector: a case study of Jordan

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Wasef Abuezhayeh ◽  
Les Ruddock ◽  
Issa Shehabat
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Business Process Management ◽  
Process Management ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Construction Sector ◽  
Content Type

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate and explain how organizations in the construction sector can enhance their decision-making process (DMP) by practising knowledge management (KM) and business process management (BPM) activities. A conceptual framework is developed that recognises the elements that impact DMP in terms of KM and BPM. The development of this framework goes beyond current empirical work on KM in addition to BPM as it investigates a wider variety of variables that impact DMP. Design/methodology/approach A case study is undertaken in the context of the construction industry in Jordan. A theoretical framework is developed and assessment of the proposed framework was undertaken through a questionnaire survey of decision-makers in the construction sector and expert interviews. Findings The outcomes of this research provide several contributions to aid decision-makers in construction organizations. Growth in the usage of KM and BPM, in addition to the integration between them, can provide employees with task-related knowledge in the organization’s operative business processes, improve process performance, promote core competence and maximise and optimise business performance. Originality/value Through the production of a framework, this study provides a tool to enable improved decision-making. The framework generates a strong operational as well as theoretical approach to the organizational utilization of knowledge and business processes.

Decision-making of investment in navigation safety improving schemes with application of cumulative prospect theory

2018 ◽  
Vol 232 (6) ◽  
pp. 710-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Wang ◽  
Qing Liu ◽  
Tongle Yin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Prospect Theory ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Cumulative Prospect Theory ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Investment Decision Making ◽  
Risk Appetite ◽  
Safety Investment ◽  
Navigation Safety

Navigation safety improving investment aims at mitigating risk and improving safety of shipping system, while decision-makers’ attitudes toward the uncertainty of shipping safety possess a characteristic of “bounded rationality.” To study the tendency of shipping safety investment decision-making with different risk perception and appetite, a decision-making method based on cumulative prospect theory is proposed in this article. First, we extract the decision attributes through analyzing the factors affecting shipping safety investment. Then, according to cumulative prospect theory, the value function and the probability weighting function for calculating cumulative prospect values of shipping investment attributes are given. Under the risk-based multi-attribute group decision-making framework, linear programming model and projection method are introduced to aggregate the weights of attributes and decision-makers, respectively. Furthermore, through a case study, the proposed methodology is utilized in Three Gorges Dam area, and the desirable safety investment scheme is determined from a set of candidate alternatives. The case study shows not only validity and feasibility of the decision-making approach but also the mechanism of shipping safety investment decision-making with consideration of the behavior characteristics of decision-makers such as reference dependence, risk appetite distortion, and loss aversion.

Drifting the goals archetype: a systemic study

Kybernetes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Virupaxi Bagodi ◽  
Biswajit Mahanty
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Systems Thinking ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Area Of Interest ◽  
Complex Decision Making ◽  
Complex Decision ◽  
Current Reality

PurposeManagerial decision-making is an area of interest to both academia and practitioners. Researchers found that managers often fail to manage complex decision-making tasks and system thinkers assert that generic structures known as systems archetypes help them to a great deal in handling such situations. In this paper, it is demonstrated that decision makers resort to lowering of goal (quick-fix) in order to resolve the gap between the goal and current reality in the “drifting the goals” systems archetype.Design/methodology/approachA real-life case study is taken up to highlight the pitfalls of “drifting the goals” systems archetype for a decision situation in the Indian two-wheeler industry. System dynamics modeling is made use of to obtain the results.FindingsThe decision makers fail to realize the pitfall of lowering the goal to resolve the gap between the goal and current reality. It is seen that, irrespective of current less-than-desirable performance, managers adopting corrective actions other than lowering of goals perform better in the long run. Further, it is demonstrated that extending the boundary and experimentation results in designing a better service system and setting benchmarks.Practical implicationsThe best possible way to avoid the pitfall is to hold the vision and not lower the long term goal. The managers must be aware of the pitfalls beforehand.Originality/valueSystems thinking is important in complex decision-making tasks. Managers need to embrace long-term perspective in decision-making. This paper demonstrates the value of systems thinking in terms of a case study on the “drifting the goals” systems archetype.

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy and Variable Weight Theory

Mekatronika ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-25
Author(s):  
Omar Ayasrah ◽  
Faiz Mohd Turan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Entropy ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Entropy Measure ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Variable Weight ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy ◽  
Perform Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Almost All

The aim of this research is to develop a new multi-criteria decision-making method that integrates an intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure and variable weight theory to be implemented in different fields to provide a solution for MCDM problems when the available information is incomplete. A limited number of studies have considered determining decision maker’s weights by performing objective techniques, and almost all of these researches detected a constant weights for the decision makers. In addition, most of the MCDM studies were not formulated to perform sensitivity analysis. The new method is based on the TOPSIS model with an intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure in the exponential-related function form and the engagement of the variable weight theory to determine weights for the decision-makers that vary as per attibutes. Lastly, a mathematical model was developed in this research to be as an input for developing the mobile-aplication based method in future for virtual use of the new MCDM method.

A Prioritized Decision Making Method for Reliability Allocation: in Optimistic and Pessimistic View

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Aniruddha Samanta ◽  
Kajla Basu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
System Reliability ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Measurement Scale ◽  
Airborne Radar ◽  
View Point ◽  
Reliability Allocation ◽  
Priority Level ◽  
Development Phases

Reliability allocation is a very important problem during early design and development phases of a system. There are several reliability allocation techniques which are used to achieve the target reliability. The feasibility of objectives (FOO) technique is one of them that is widely used to perform system reliability allocation. But this technique has two fundamental shortcomings. The first is the measurement scale and the second is that it does not consider the order weight of the reliability allocation factors. The prioritization of the factors is also an important topic in decision making. Practically, all factors in multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) are not in the same priority level. Hence, in decision making situation, it is usual for decision makers to consider different priority factors. So, considering the prioritization of the factors, a reliability allocation method is proposed here to overcome the shortcomings of the FOO technique. Also, a case study on reliability allocation in airborne radar system is considered here to verify the efficiency of the proposed approach. Finally, the results are calculated in different optimistic and pessimistic view point and compared with the FOO technique. This comparison exhibits the advantages and supremacy of the proposed approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document