scholarly journals Awkward defects around the elbow: The radial recurrent artery flap revisited

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (03) ◽  
pp. 357-361
Author(s):  
Maksud M. Devale ◽  
Rohit P. Munot ◽  
Chirag A. Bhansali ◽  
Neeraj D. Bhaban
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Elbow Joint ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Distal Humerus ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Posterior Aspect ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Radial Recurrent Artery

ABSTRACT Background: Soft tissue defects on the posterior aspect of the elbow are commonly seen in patients treated with internal fixation for fractures around the elbow joint. An axial flap based on the radial recurrent artery (RRA) is very useful for such defects, especially if a posterior midline arm incision has been taken for skeletal fixation. The aim of this study is to describe the usefulness of RRA flap (based on the RRA) in the management of such defects. Materials and Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of 4 cases managed with the RRA flap for soft tissue reconstruction of defects around the elbow joint at our institute from January 2015 to August 2016. All the patients were males with a history of exposed implant following internal fixation of olecranon/distal humerus fracture. The size of defects ranged from 4 cm × 4 cm to 7 cm × 5 cm. Results of the analysis are presented here. Results: All flaps survived completely. There was no infection, hematoma or distal neurovascular deficit. There was minimal donor site morbidity. Conclusion: The RRA flap is a useful, simple flap for defects around the elbow joint in select patients providing one stage, reliable, cosmetically acceptable coverage.

A Homodigital Reverse Pedicle Island Flap in Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Finger and the Thumb

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. NIRANJAN ◽  
J. R. ARMSTRONG
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Island Flap ◽  
Tissue Loss ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction

A single stage homodigital reverse pedicle island flap is described for the repair of volar or dorsal tissue loss on the finger or thumb. Donor site morbidity is minimal, and the length of the digit is preserved. Satisfactory function results in 25 patients are presented.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
pp. 63-74
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Open Fractures ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Excision

Soft tissue coverage of open fractures with well-vascularised tissues should be performed within 72 hours of injury or at the same time as internal fixation. It may be in the form of local or free flaps, and may comprise muscle, fasciocutaneous tissues, or both. Flap selection depends on multiple factors, including the size and location of the defect following wound excision, availability of flaps, and donor site morbidity. Local flaps are usually used to cover defects with a limited zone of injury. Anastomoses for free flaps should be performed outside the zone of injury. Experimental data suggest that coverage with muscle leads to improved healing of fractures. However, there is currently little clinical evidence to support the use of one form of soft tissue cover over another for open fractures of the lower limb. The plastic surgeon must always consider the donor site morbidity of the flap(s) chosen.

scholarly journals Retrospective analysis of free temporoparietal fascial flap for defect reconstruction of the hand and the distal upper extremity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wibke Müller-Seubert ◽  
Raymund E. Horch ◽  
Vanessa Franziska Schmidt ◽  
Ingo Ludolph ◽  
Marweh Schmitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Reconstructive Surgery ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Flap Necrosis ◽  
Fascial Flap ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction

Abstract Introduction Soft tissue reconstruction of the hand and distal upper extremity is challenging to preserve the function of the hand as good as possible. Therefore, a thin flap has been shown to be useful. In this retrospective study, we aimed to show the use of the free temporoparietal fascial flap in soft tissue reconstruction of the hand and distal upper extremity. Methods We analysed the outcome of free temporoparietal fascial flaps that were used between the years 2007and 2016 at our institution. Major and minor complications, defect location and donor site morbidity were the main fields of interest. Results 14 patients received a free temporoparietal fascial flap for soft tissue reconstruction of the distal upper extremity. Minor complications were noted in three patients and major complications in two patients. Total flap necrosis occurred in one patient. Conclusion The free temporoparietal fascial flap is a useful tool in reconstructive surgery of the hand and the distal upper extremity with a low donor site morbidity and moderate rates of major and minor complications.

scholarly journals Versatility of Free Cutaneous Flaps for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 058-066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Wang ◽  
Jose Alonso-Escalante ◽  
Brian Cho ◽  
Ramon DeJesus
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Epigastric Artery ◽  
Reconstructive Microsurgery ◽  
Flap Design ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction

AbstractThe goals of upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction should go well beyond providing coverage and restoring function. As the field of reconstructive microsurgery has evolved, free cutaneous flaps (FCFs) are gaining wider application. The advantages of FCF include minimizing donor-site morbidity by preserving the muscle and fascia, improving versatility of flap design, and superior aesthetic results. This review highlights the application of anterolateral thigh, superficial circumflex iliac artery, deep inferior epigastric perforator, superficial inferior epigastric artery, and flow-through flaps for reconstruction of upper extremity defects. These flaps share several qualities in common: well-concealed donor sites, preservation of major arteries responsible of providing inflow to distal extremity, and potential for a two-team approach (donor and recipient sites). While the choice of flaps should be decided based on individual patient and defect characteristics, FCF should be considered as excellent options to achieve the goals of upper extremity reconstruction.

“Spare Part” Forearm Free Flaps Harvested from the Amputated Limb for Coverage of Amputation Stumps

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. WEINBERG ◽  
M. M. AL-QATTAN ◽  
J. MAHONEY
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Radial Artery ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Spare Part ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Amputation Stumps ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Different Tissues

The use of “spare part” flaps from a non-replantable limb to cover amputation stumps in the upper extremity preserves limb length, provides durable coverage and sensation and will avoid additional donor site morbidity. We have studied the blood supply of the forearm based on the radial artery. The potential for harvesting different tissues is confirmed. In five clinical cases reliable primary soft tissue reconstruction was achieved, even in the presence of trauma.

Timing of Soft Tissue Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
pp. 57-62
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Free Flap ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Free Flap Reconstruction ◽  
Fracture Union ◽  
Patient Factors ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Excision

Soft tissue cover of a meticulously and comprehensively excised (debrided) wound is the cornerstone of achieving infection-free fracture union. Planning of the soft tissue reconstruction should ideally occur at the time of wound excision. Definitive soft tissue reconstruction should be performed within 72 hours of the injury unless precluded by patient factors, and at the same time as internal fixation of the fracture. Free flap reconstruction is ideally performed on scheduled lists in specialist orthoplastic centres.

Temporary Wound Dressings

2020 ◽  
pp. 31-40
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Negative Pressure ◽  
First Aid ◽  
Wound Dressings ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Wound Excision

Temporary dressings are used to cover the wound from the time of first aid through to definitive soft tissue closure. Frequent dressing changes should be avoided to reduce contamination by nosocomial organisms. Therefore, the initial dressing should be simple to apply and maintain tissue viability by preventing desiccation, e.g. gauze soaked in normal saline and covered with an occlusive film as per the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. Following wound excision, a simple non-adherent dressing can be used. Negative pressure wound therapy should not be used to downgrade the requirement for definitive soft tissue reconstruction, which should be achieved within 72 hours of injury. Following internal fixation, definitive soft tissue reconstruction should be performed at the same time.

Submental Flap for Soft Tissue Reconstruction following Radical Parotidectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. 1130-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Bayon ◽  
Andrew B. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Island Flap ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Submental Flap ◽  
Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Submental Island Flap

This study analyzed our institution’s experience with a buried submental flap for soft tissue reconstruction following radical parotidectomy. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who had parotid malignancies requiring radical parotidectomy, who also underwent a buried submental flap reconstruction. Analysis included patient demographics and clinical, surgical, and outcome data. Three patients met criteria for this study who underwent a buried submental flap at a tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2016. All patients had oncologic surgery and reconstruction using a deepithelialized submental island flap, which was used to fill the radical parotidectomy surgical defect with no complications and good aesthetic results. Each patient received appropriate adjuvant therapy. This case series shows that the buried submental island flap is a versatile flap that is adequate bulk after radical parotidectomy. It also has no impact on hospital length of stay and provides excellent cosmetic outcomes with minimal donor site morbidity.

scholarly journals Skull Base Reconstruction in the Pediatric Patient

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (01) ◽  
pp. 081-090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irit Duek ◽  
Alon Pener-Tessler ◽  
Ravit Yanko-Arzi ◽  
Arik Zaretski ◽  
Avraham Abergel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Skull Base ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Donor Site Morbidity ◽  
Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽  
Cumulative Impact ◽  
Skull Base Reconstruction ◽  
Unique Challenge ◽  
First Choice

Introduction Pediatric skull base and craniofacial reconstruction presents a unique challenge since the potential benefits of therapy must be balanced against the cumulative impact of multimodality treatment on craniofacial growth, donor-site morbidity, and the potential for serious psychosocial issues. Objectives To suggest an algorithm for skull base reconstruction in children and adolescents after tumor resection. Materials and Methods Comprehensive literature review and summary of our experience. Results We advocate soft-tissue reconstruction as the primary technique, reserving bony flaps for definitive procedures in survivors who have reached skeletal maturity. Free soft-tissue transfer in microvascular technique is the mainstay for reconstruction of large, three-dimensional defects, involving more than one anatomic region of the skull base, as well as defects involving an irradiated field. However, to reduce total operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and donor-site morbidity, locoregional flaps are better be considered the flap of first choice for skull base reconstruction in children and adolescents, as long as the flap is large enough to cover the defect. Our “workhorse” for dural reconstruction is the double-layer fascia lata. Advances in endoscopic surgery, image guidance, alloplastic grafts, and biomaterials have increased the armamentarium for reconstruction of small and mid-sized defects. Conclusions Skull base reconstruction using locoregional flaps or free flaps may be safely performed in pediatrics. Although the general principles of skull base reconstruction are applicable to nearly all patients, the unique demands of skull base surgery in pediatrics merit special attention. Multidisciplinary care in experienced centers is of utmost importance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document