Laparoscopic resection rectopexy versus laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Sameh Hany ◽  
Mohamed Abo-Elkheir ◽  
Sabry Ahmed ◽  
Saleh El-Awady ◽  
Mohamed Farid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Rectoanal Intussusception ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy

Laparoscopic resection rectopexy

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S8
Author(s):  
Rashmi Pyasi ◽  
A.K. Kriplani ◽  
Prateek Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy

scholarly journals The Impact of Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy in Patients with Total Rectal Prolapse

2005 ◽  
Vol 170 (9) ◽  
pp. 743-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sezai Demirbas ◽  
M. Levhi Akin ◽  
Yavuz Kurt ◽  
Ibrahim Ogün ◽  
Tuncay Çelenk
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy ◽  
The Impact

Functional Results of Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy for Symptomatic Rectal Intussusception

2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael von Papen ◽  
Luai H. S. Ashari ◽  
John W. Lumley ◽  
Andrew R. L. Stevenson ◽  
Russell W. Stitz
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Rectal Intussusception ◽  
Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy

scholarly journals Clinical Outcome after Resection Rectopexy in patients with Constipation and Rectal Prolapse

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adisa Poljo ◽  
Bettina Klugsberger ◽  
Günther Klimbacher ◽  
Wolfgang Schimetta ◽  
Andreas Shamiyeh
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Gastrointestinal Quality Of Life ◽  
Giqli Score

Abstract Purpose Laparoscopic resection rectopexy (LRR) is an established procedure for the treatment of rectal prolapse. This study evaluated constipation and gastrointestinal quality of life in patients before and after LRR for rectal prolapse. Methods 30 patients (24 females, 6 males) underwent laparoscopic anterior (n = 14), posterior (n = 8) and suture resection rectopexy (n = 8) for rectal prolapse during 2010–2020. 25 were retrospectively evaluated for constipation and gastrointestinal quality of life using validated Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Results Constipation score was significantly reduced from median 16.0 ± 6.4 to 6.0 ± 4.7 after 68.0 ± 42.8 months (p < 0.001). Constipation was improved in 20 patients (80.0%), unaltered in 2 patients and worse in 3 patients. Prior abdominal surgeries were associated with less improvement for constipation (p < 0,05). Significant improvement in GIQLI score was observed, with median total GIQLI score increasing from 95.0 ± 14.8 to 124.0 ± 18.2 (p < 0.001). Quality of life improved in 21 patients (84.0%). Positive changes were also observed in GIQLI subgroups of gastrointestinal symptoms, emotions, physical status, social dysfunction and effects of medical treatment (p < 0.001). There was no difference in outcome between the three procedures. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse is safe, feasible, and very effective regarding both perioperative results and long-term functional outcome. Our results suggest that LRR significantly improves constipation in patients with outlet obstruction and clearly contributes to a higher quality of life.

Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center study during 16 years

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 2401-2406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilman Laubert ◽  
Markus Kleemann ◽  
Alexander Schorcht ◽  
Ralf Czymek ◽  
Thomas Jungbluth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Single Center Study ◽  
Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy ◽  
Center Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document