scholarly journals Effects of training based on the health belief model on Iranian women's performance about cervical screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Somayeh Abdolahian ◽  
Masoumeh Simbar ◽  
Masumeh Ghazanfarpour
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-220
Author(s):  
Omid Khosravizadeh ◽  
Bahman Ahadinezhad ◽  
Aisa Maleki ◽  
Pariya Vosoughi ◽  
Zahra Najafpour

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel A. Harrison ◽  
Patricia D. Mullen ◽  
Lawrence W. Green

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Carpenter

The Health Belief Model (Rosenstock, 1966) was constructed to explain which beliefs should be targeted in communication campaigns to cause positive health behaviors. The model specifies that if individuals perceives a negative health outcome to be severe, perceives themselves to be susceptible to it, perceives the benefits to behaviors which reduce the likelihood of that outcome to be high, and perceives the barriers to adopting those behaviors to be low, then the behavior is likely. A meta-analysis of 18 studies (2,702 subjects) was conducted to determine if measures of these beliefs could longitudinally predict behavior. Benefits and barriers were consistently the strongest predictors. The length of time between measurement of the HBM beliefs and behavior, prevention versus treatment behaviors, and drug taking regimens v. other behaviors were identified as moderators of the HBM variables’ predictive power.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Reza Sadeghi ◽  
Fatemeh Baghernezhad Hesary ◽  
Narges Khanjani

Background: Diabetes is one of the most common metabolic diseases in the world and a serious health problem, that requires comprehensive interventions. This systematic review was conducted to summarize educational interventions based on the Health Belief Model aimed to prevent and control diabetes. Methods: Searches were done on May 30, 2019 in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, SID, Magiran, and IranMedex databases in English and Persian. The inclusion criteria included quantitative original interventional studies that aimed to control type 2 diabetes, and the intervention was based on the Health Belief Model. Studies done outside of Iran, interventions on other types of diabetes, non-interventional studies, and reviews were excluded. Results: Eventually, 13 studies (6 English and 7 Persian articles) entered this systematic review. The intervention durations were from 2 to 3 months. These studies fell into three broad categories: 1- Prevention of the disease 2- Improving Nutrition behaviors in patients 3-Prevention of disease complications or its progress. All of the educational interventions showed a positive effect for education on the prevention and control of diabetes. Conclusions: Interventions based on the HBM have shown an effective role in controlling and preventing diabetes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (6) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaelan Sumo Sulat ◽  
Yayi Suryo Prabandari ◽  
Rossi Sanusi ◽  
Elsi Dwi Hapsari ◽  
Budiono Santoso

Purpose The health belief model (HBM) is the behavioral change theory most widely used in health behavior studies. Several studies have identified the limitations of this model, one of which concerns the validity in predicting behavioral changes. The purpose of this paper, scoping review, is to map the validity of HBM variables in predicting behavioral changes based on available synthesized evidences. Design/methodology/approach A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. PubMed, Health Evidence, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar were searched using a combination of keywords: health belief model, review, systematic review and meta-analysis between February 15 and March 18, 2016. Findings Of the 1,457 articles, 4 met the inclusion criteria. All results showed that HBM variables were consistently related to behaviors and the strength of the correlation were varied. Perceived barriers and perceived benefits were the strongest predictor, while perceived severity was the weakest. The association between HBM variables and behaviors was moderated by some aspects of behavioral outcomes, the study design and the time interval between measurement of the HBM variables and behavior. Originality/value Although the four main variables of HBM have been shown to be related to behavior, the overall outcomes are varied and have not demonstrated conclusive evidence during the last ten years. The results of this scoping review imply the need for a systematic review and meta-analysis of the results of recent studies. In addition, more longitudinal studies are needed to ensure the validity of HBM variables by considering any possible moderators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document