Nasal tooth: case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Osama Masoud
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Vijay P Agrawal ◽  
Nitin Wasnik ◽  
Jetendra Yede ◽  
Arpit Gupta

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-252
Author(s):  
Samuel Macedo Costa ◽  
Alessandro Oliveira de Jesus ◽  
Roger Lanes Silveira ◽  
Marcio Bruno Figueiredo Amaral

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (06) ◽  
pp. 310-313
Author(s):  
Alexander Acheampong Oti ◽  
Sabbah Daniel Kwasi ◽  
Siale Edem Edward ◽  
Gyimah Nana Tuffor Ampem

2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 681
Author(s):  
Si Hyun Park ◽  
Ji Hye Kim ◽  
Hee Young Hwang ◽  
Dal Mo Yang ◽  
Hyung Sik Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nawaf Alfayez ◽  
Salwa AlRashed ALHumaid ◽  
Abdulrhman Alfayez
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
T A van Essen ◽  
J B van Rijswijk

AbstractObjective:This paper describes a patient with recurrent unilateral nasal discomfort and pain due to an intranasal tooth. A short overview of the literature is provided in relation to the aetiology, symptomatology, diagnosis and treatment of intranasal teeth.Case report:A 26-year-old man was referred with a history of recurrent left-sided nasal obstruction, facial pain and discomfort, and chronic purulent rhinorrhoea. Computed tomography revealed a nasal tooth, which was likely to have been the cause of these symptoms. After transnasal surgical extraction under endoscopic guidance, the patient was relieved of his complaints (at the one-year follow up).Conclusion:An ectopic tooth in the nasal cavity is a rare phenomenon, and in most cases the cause of an intranasal tooth remains unclear. The treatment of an intranasal tooth entails surgical extraction even though such teeth may remain asymptomatic; several cases have illustrated the potential significant morbidity associated with their occurrence.


1996 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Nastri ◽  
A. C. Smith
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Sharma B B ◽  
Sharma S ◽  
Sharma JD ◽  
Sharma KD ◽  
Kaur J
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anajar S ◽  
Tatari MM ◽  
Wydadi O ◽  
Rouadi S ◽  
Abada R ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-690
Author(s):  
C. S. Vanaja ◽  
Miriam Soni Abigail

Purpose Misophonia is a sound tolerance disorder condition in certain sounds that trigger intense emotional or physiological responses. While some persons may experience misophonia, a few patients suffer from misophonia. However, there is a dearth of literature on audiological assessment and management of persons with misophonia. The purpose of this report is to discuss the assessment of misophonia and highlight the management option that helped a patient with misophonia. Method A case study of a 26-year-old woman with the complaint of decreased tolerance to specific sounds affecting quality of life is reported. Audiological assessment differentiated misophonia from hyperacusis. Management included retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy based on the principles described by P. J. Jastreboff and Jastreboff (2014). A misophonia questionnaire was administered at regular intervals to monitor the effectiveness of therapy. Results A detailed case history and audiological evaluations including pure-tone audiogram and Johnson Hyperacusis Index revealed the presence of misophonia. The patient benefitted from intervention, and the scores of the misophonia questionnaire indicated a decrease in the severity of the problem. Conclusions It is important to differentially diagnose misophonia and hyperacusis in persons with sound tolerance disorders. Retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy can help patients who suffer from misophonia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document