scholarly journals Nitrous Oxide Fluxes from a Commercial Beef Cattle Feedlot in Kansas

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. ASWR.S12841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orlando A. Aguilar ◽  
Ronaldo Maghirang ◽  
Charles W. Rice ◽  
Steven L. Trabue ◽  
Larry E. Erickson

Emission of greenhouse gases, including nitrous oxide (N2O), from open beef cattle feedlots is becoming an environmental concern; however, research measuring emission rates of N2O from open beef cattle feedlots has been limited. This study was conducted to quantify N2O emission fluxes as affected by pen surface conditions, in a commercial beef cattle feedlot in the state of Kansas, USA, from July 2010 through September 2011. The measurement period represented typical feedlot conditions, with air temperatures ranging from -24 to 39°C. Static flux chambers were used to collect gas samples from pen surfaces at 0, 15, and 30 minutes. Gas samples were analyzed with a gas chromatograph and from the measured concentrations, fluxes were calculated. Median emission flux from the moist/muddy surface condition was 2.03 mg m−2 hour−1, which was about 20 times larger than the N2O fluxes from the other pen surface conditions. In addition, N2O peaks from the moist/muddy pen surface condition were six times larger than emission peaks previously reported for agricultural soils.

2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry F. Bonifacio ◽  
Ronaldo G. Maghirang ◽  
Edna B. Razote ◽  
Steven L. Trabue ◽  
John H. Prueger

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1209-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi M. Waldrip ◽  
Kenneth D. Casey ◽  
Richard W. Todd ◽  
David B. Parker

Abstract. The Texas Panhandle produces approximately 42% of finished beef in the U.S., and cattle production is estimated to contribute 8 Tg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) from nitrous oxide (N2O). Production of N2O in manure is largely a result of biochemical processes that are not static: N2O emission rates are dependent on numerous environmental and chemical factors. Process-based models that estimate N2O emissions from manure in open-lot cattle production systems typically rely on information derived from studies of soil biochemistry. Limited study has been conducted on manure-derived N2O in open-lot beef feedyards. The objectives of this study were to determine variables related to N2O losses from Texas Panhandle feedyards and develop empirical models to predict N2O emissions. Nitrous oxide flux data were collected from a series of 15 non-flow-through, non-steady-state (NFT-NSS) chamber studies (ten chambers per study) conducted from 2012 to 2014 on two commercial beef cattle feedyards. Manure samples (loose surface manure and the underlying manure pack) were analyzed for basic physicochemical properties, soluble carbon (C) and nitrogen (N), and ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectral characteristics related to degree of organic matter (OM) stability and humification. Measured N2O emissions ranged from below detection to 101 mg m-2 h-1 (average 4.8 ±12 mg m-2 h-1) and were positively related to manure H2O content, temperature, and nitrate (NO3-) concentration (p < 0.01). Emissions were negatively related to manure OM, ammonia/ammonium (NH3/NH4+), dissolved C and dissolved N concentrations, and UV-vis parameters related to OM stability (p < 0.05). Based on these data, empirical models were developed and evaluated to predict manure-derived N2O emissions. Model predictions were not significantly different from observed N2O emissions (p < 0.05). The unbounded index of agreement (IA) indicated that model predictions were within 52% to 61% agreement with observations. Inclusion of OM characteristics improved model predictions of high (>30 mg m-2 h-1) N2O emissions but tended to overestimate low emission rates (<20 mg N2O m-2 h-1). This provides evidence for the importance of C stability in limiting manure N2O production. These models may improve parameterization of existing process-based models and are novel methods for predicting feedyard N2O emissions. Keywords: Beef cattle, Feedlot, Feedyard, Greenhouse gas, Manure, Modeling, Nitrous oxide, Organic matter, Urine, UV-vis spectroscopy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Parker ◽  
Heidi M. Waldrip ◽  
Kenneth D. Casey ◽  
Richard W. Todd ◽  
William M. Willis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry F. Bonifacio ◽  
Ronaldo G. Maghirang ◽  
Brent W. Auvermann ◽  
Edna B. Razote ◽  
James P. Murphy ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 4142-4150 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Mueller ◽  
H. M. Blalock ◽  
R. H. Pritchard

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document