scholarly journals Comparison of the Pathological Response and Adverse Effects of Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine versus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in the Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Approach for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Randomized Control Trial Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Cheraghi ◽  
Maedeh Barahman ◽  
Ramyar Hariri ◽  
Alireza Nikoofar ◽  
Pedram Fadavi
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Randomized Control Trial ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Randomized Control

A multicountry chart review of treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 184-184
Author(s):  
Prianka Singh ◽  
Joseph Gricar ◽  
deMauri S Mackie ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Marc DeCongelio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

184 Background: Global neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment patterns among patients with resected Esophageal Cancer (EC) and Gastroesophageal Junction cancer (GEJC) remain unclear. This study describes real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients receiving surgery for Stage II or III EC or GEJC. Methods: Physicians in North America (US, Canada), Asia (China, Japan, Taiwan), and Europe (UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain) provided clinical and treatment data in this retrospective, non-interventional chart review conducted from April-June 2020. Included patients were adults (Japan ≥20 years; elsewhere, ≥18 years), who underwent resection of Stage II or III EC or GEJC between October 2017 and October 2018 and were followed until death, loss to follow up, or end of data collection. Results: Physicians (N = 609) provided data on 1693 patients of mean age of 62.4 years, who received surgery for Stage II or III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (33.3%), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (31.5%), or GEJC (35.2%) and were followed a mean (median) of 17.7 (17) months (to death or end of study period). At diagnosis, 85.6% of patients had performance status of 0/1. The majority of patients received an R0 resection (overall, 70.6%; ESCC, 76.6%, EAC, 67.4%, GEJC, 68.0%; p < 0.05); of these, 32.0% had a complete pathological response and 64.1% had a partial pathological response. Neoadjuvant therapy use differed among the treatment groups (ESCC 56.5%; EAC, 65.9%; GEJC, 62.6%, p < 0.05), as did adjuvant therapy (ESCC: 39.8%; EAC, 40.3%; GEJC, 44.5%; p = 0.023). Recurrence rate following surgery did not differ between groups for any recurrence (overall, 21.0%; ESCC 18.5%, EAC 23.6%, GEJC 21.1%); for local or regional recurrence (overall, 11.6%; ESCC, 10.3%; EAC, 12.7%; GEJC, 11.7%); or for metastatic recurrence (overall, 9.5%; ESCC, 8.2%; EAC, 10.9%; GEJC, 9.4%). The median time to local or regional recurrence (for those who progressed during the reporting period) was 8 months from date of initial surgery (overall, 8 mo; ESCC, 8 mo; EAC, 7 mo; GEJC, 8.5 mo; p > 0.05). The frequency of 1L systemic therapy for advanced disease at the time of survey completion was 16.1% overall and differed among patients with ESCC (14.6%); EAC (17.8%); and GEJC (15.9%); p > 0.05. Conclusions: This large multi-country real world data study shows that over half of all patients received neoadjuvant therapy, and over a third received adjuvant treatment. The high unmet need in this population is evident from the post-resection recurrence rate of 21.1% at median 8 months and the high proportion of patients who went on to require advanced disease treatment.

Adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT): Expanded efficacy and safety analyses from CheckMate 577.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4003-4003
Author(s):  
Ronan Joseph Kelly ◽  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Jaroslaw Kuzdzal ◽  
Thomas Zander ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

4003 Background: In CheckMate 577 (NCT02743494), NIVO demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS; primary endpoint) vs placebo (PBO) and was well tolerated in patients (pts) with resected (R0) stage II/III EC/GEJC who received neoadjuvant CRT and had residual pathologic disease. Median DFS doubled with NIVO vs PBO (22.4 vs 11.0 months; HR 0.69; 96.4% CI 0.56–0.86; P = 0.0003). Serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and TRAEs leading to discontinuation were reported for < 10% of pts with NIVO and 3% with PBO. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to NIVO 240 mg or PBO Q2W for 16 weeks, followed by NIVO 480 mg or PBO Q4W. Here, we present additional efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life (QoL) data from CheckMate 577. Results: 794 pts were randomized (NIVO, 532; PBO, 262). Distant recurrence was reported for 29% vs 39% and locoregional recurrence for 12% vs 17% of pts in the NIVO vs PBO groups, respectively. Median distant metastasis-free survival was 28.3 vs 17.6 months with NIVO vs PBO (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.60–0.92). Median progression-free survival 2 (PFS2; time from randomization to progression after subsequent systemic therapy, initiation of second subsequent systemic therapy, or death, whichever is earlier) was not reached with NIVO vs 32.1 months with PBO (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.99). TRAEs with potential immunologic etiology (select TRAEs; sTRAEs) reported for NIVO are presented in the table. Results for the FACT-ECS and FACT-G7 showed similar trends for QoL improvement from baseline for NIVO and PBO during treatment and maintained benefit post-treatment. Conclusions: Adjuvant NIVO demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy, an acceptable safety profile, and maintained QoL, providing further support for its use as a new standard of care for pts with resected EC/GEJC who received neoadjuvant CRT with residual pathologic disease. Clinical trial information: NCT02743494. [Table: see text]

Preoperative Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan in Resectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Pathological Response as Primary Endpoint and FDG-PET Predictions

Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Berenato ◽  
Federica Morano ◽  
Filippo Pietrantonio ◽  
Christian Cotsoglou ◽  
Marta Caporale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

scholarly journals Chemoradiotherapy Using Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel versus Cisplatin plus Fluorouracil for Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Di Maria Jiang ◽  
Hao-Wen Sim ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Bryan A. Chan ◽  
Akina Natori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Trimodality Therapy ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Trimodality therapy (TMT) with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) using concurrent carboplatin plus paclitaxel (CP) followed by surgery is the standard of care for locoregional esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers. Alternatively, nCRT with cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) can be used. Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with CP or CF can be used if surgery is not planned. In the absence of comparative trials, we aimed to evaluate outcomes of CP and CF in the settings of TMT and dCRT. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-site, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to identify all patients who received CRT for locoregional esophageal or GEJ cancer. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model. The inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used for sensitivity analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Between 2011 and 2015, 93 patients with esophageal (49%) and GEJ (51%) cancers underwent nCRT (<i>n</i> = 67; 72%) or dCRT (<i>n</i> = 26; 28%). Median age was 62.3 years and 74% were male. Median follow-up was 23.9 months. Comparing CP to CF in the setting of TMT, the OS and DFS rates were similar. In the setting of dCRT, CP was associated with significantly inferior 3-year OS (36 vs. 63%; <i>p</i> = 0.001; HR 3.1; 95% CI: 1.2–7.7) and DFS (0 vs. 41%; <i>p</i> = 0.004; HR 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4–8.9) on multivariable and IPTW sensitivity analyses. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> TMT with CF and CP produced comparable outcomes. However, for dCRT, CF may be a superior regimen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document