scholarly journals Legal Certainty on The Implementation of Death Criminal Decisions that have Permanent Law Power in Indonesia(A Review of the Death Criminal Decision on Narcotics in 2014-2018)

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
ALI JOHARDI WIROGIOTO ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Research Method ◽  
First Principle ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Principle Of Legality

The principle of legal certainty applied to the principle of extra ordinary crime is contrary to the respect for humanity as the most fundamental human rights principle and the principle of legality is associated with positive law and international conventions. The results of this study are intended to seek or find arguments for the certainty of the execution of the death penalty for the community, family, convicts and the state, so that the research on death penalty decisions in narcotics cases that occurred from 2014 to 2018. This research method is included in normative juridical law research. The conclusion is, sentencing with the threat of the death penalty can still be applied in Indonesia in narcotics crime cases is appropriate. Therefore, the death penalty, of course, state law does not conflict with religious law/teachings, in other words, the death penalty does not conflict with the first precepts because the first principle of Pancasila is Belief in One God, which means based on the beliefs/religions of each person who in carrying out/believes His religion is also guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which is contained in Article 28 E paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 29 paragraph (2).

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE, THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto . .
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense. Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.<br /><br />Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights.

scholarly journals DEATH PENALTY EXECUTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA, AND INDONESIAN LAW

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksidelfa Yanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Deterrent Effect ◽  
General Nature ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Power ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>The execution of Death penalty in Indonesia is based on the court verdict that has had a permanent legal power. Only through the court ruling a man can be executed a death penalty upon the guilty alleged at him/her. The death penalty application in Indonesia is provided in the positive law with specific or general nature. As a country having the most verdicts with the capital punishment, either to its local citizen or to the foreign citizen who commits any offenders in the jurisdiction of Republic of Indonesia, triggering the existing of pro and contra stance on the capital punishment execution. The opposing stance based its argument on the human rights perspective, affirming that the capital punishment can be categorized as a form of savage and inhuman punishment and is in the contrary with the constitution. While the stance supporting the capital punishment execution is based on the argumentation that the perpetrator must be avenged in compliance with his/her commit, in order to give a deterrent effect for others who want to commit similar offense.    Nevertheless as a matter of fact, there are still many similar offense occurred though capital punishment has been implemented.    </em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords : Capital punishment, rights to live and human rights</em></strong><strong><em>.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>

scholarly journals Nikah Sirri Menurut Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-264
Author(s):  
Endang Zakaria ◽  
Muhammad Saad
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Strong Bond ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Religious Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Principle Of Legality

Islamic law defines marriage as an absolute obligation to follow Allah's command and carry it out as worship and represents a very strong bond. In the context of unregistered marriage, it can be defined as “a form of marriage based on religious law or custom, as well as one that is not announced to a crowd and is not registered with the marriage registry”. This paper discusses literacy in Islamic law and positive law on unregistered marriages. Positive law studies on  unregistered  marriages   are  carried  out  on  the   essence  of  the Law of the Republic of Indonesia and Government Regulations. According   to  Indonesian   law,   sirri   marriage   is a  marriage   that is not based on the principle of legality. In Islam, the study of unregistered   marriage   was   based   on   Qur’an   and   hadith.   This means that it is not legally binding. A marriage that is in accordance   with   the  pillars  and   conditions   of   marriage   is valid  under  Islamic law, as are   marriages   performed   in   sirri marriages, as defined in Indonesian law.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI HUKUMAN MATI DITINJAU DARI ASPEK HAM SIPIL DALAM PERSEPEKTIF HAK UNTUK HIDUP

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-91
Author(s):  
I Gusti Bagus Hengki
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Scientific Paper ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Perpetrators And Victims ◽  
The Right

This scientific paper is expected to find out how the existence of the death penalty is viewed from the aspect of Civil Human Rights in the perspective of the right to life and whether the existence of the death penalty is contrary to the ideology of the Pancasila State and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Human Rights Law with a normative research methodology with using a statutory approach. From the results of the discussion that the existence of the death penalty in terms of the Civil Human Rights aspect in the perspective of the right to life still needs to be maintained, because it does not conflict with the ideology of the Pancasila State and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Human Rights Law, UDHR and ICCPR, as well as religion. in Indonesia, as long as it is not carried out arbitrarily, in accordance with the provisions of the legislation. This needs to be done because to provide protection for individual perpetrators and victims against acts of revenge, emotional, uncontrollable, vigilante, so that it does not guarantee that the death penalty is abolished. Indeed, there are parties who are pro and contra about the death penalty by both underpinning Pancasila, all of which is to make Pancasila a "Justification".   Tulisan ilmiah ini diharapkan dapat mengetahui bagaimana eksistensi  hukuman mati  ditinjau dari aspek  HAM Sipil dalam perspektif hak untuk hidup  dan apakah eksistensi  hukuman mati bertentangan dengan  ideologi Negara Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 serta  Undang-Undang HAM dengan metodologi penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan jenis pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute Approach). Dari hasil pembahasan bahwa eksistensi hukuman mati ditinjau dari aspek HAM Sipil dalam perspektif Hak untuk hidup  masih perlu dipertahankan, karena tidak bertentangan dengan ideologi Negara Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Undang-Undang HAM, UDHR dan ICCPR, maupun agama yang ada di Indonesia, asal dilaksanakan  tidak sewenang-wenang, sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hal ini perlu diadakan  karena untuk memberikan perlindungan terhadap individu pelaku dan korban terhadap tindakan balas dendam, emosional, tidak terkendali, main hakim sendiri, sehingga tidak menjamin bahwa kalau hukuman pidana mati ditiadakan.  Memang ada pihak yang pro dan kontra tentang hukuman mati dengan sama-sama mendasari Pancasila, semuanya itu untuk menjadikan Pancasila sebagai “Justification“.

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KONTEKS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law

scholarly journals The Legal Status of Appraisal of Materials Guarantee for Bancruptcy Process of Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Anne Rusiana ◽  
Jamal Wiwoho ◽  
Adi Sulistiyono
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Case ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Discovery ◽  
As If

This research studies the legal status of a material guarantee for the bankruptcy process of Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to find out the legal status of whether the material guarantee that has been declared bankrupt by the appraisal because of not fulfill of repayment of the debtor to the creditor can be transferred on non-bankruptcy status? Moreover, what is the creditor's execution rights to the debtor's material guarantee? This research uses a normative legal research method, namely: legal research that is done with the purpose of discovering the principles and philosophical base (dogma or doctrine) of positive law, and the research of legal discovery efforts in concreto that is suitable to be implemented to solve a particular legal case. The result of this research is that material guarantees that have been determined as Bankruptcy cannot be transferred to their status when they are sold with a non-bankrupt status before a written decision by the judge justified the status. This shows obedience to the principles of legality and legal certainty, that selling the bankrupt assets with the status of (non-bankrupt assets) cannot be justified according to the law. If the curator still continues to sell the bankrupt assets, that process is illegal, including the execution of the selling according to the law. When it was being declared of bankrupt the total value of the material guarantee is assessed by the appraisal to be sufficient for paying all debts to the creditor, then it became the guarantee of repayment of the debtor, but if the value of the material guarantee valued by the appraisal is smaller than the debt, then there must be a reassessment in order to make justice for debtors and creditors. Mortgage-holding creditors, fiduciary guarantees, mortgage rights, mortgages, or other collateral rights, can execute their rights as if Bankruptcy did not occur, but there are several receivables that must be matched before executing their separatist rights.

scholarly journals WORK TERMINATION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSITIVE LAW IN INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Inayah Inayah ◽  
Surisman Surisman
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Reciprocal Relationship ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Work Relations ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Republic

The case of work termination which involves businessowners and labor happens widelyin various companies due to the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This research usesthe normative legal research method. During this Covid-19 pandemic, this worktermination is carried out to save the company and to prevent more victims. Problemswhich happen regarding work termination include the reasons for this termination andthe post-termination compensation. Work relations is a reciprocal relationship which isbased on a two-party agreement. The legal protection for work termination may becarried out during this Covid-19 pandemic. If the rights stated above are not obtainedby the workers, then they may initiate a deliberation. They may also go through conflictresolution procedures on industrial relations outside of court, based on the Republic ofIndonesia’s Constitution No. 2 of 2004.

scholarly journals Hukuman Mati Bagi Koruptor Pada Saat Keadaan Tertentu (Pandemi COVID-19) Perspektif Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Islam

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-150
Author(s):  
Dahyul Daipon
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Government

The current condition of the Covid-19 pandemic is a time where almost everyone feels social and economic difficulties. Communities whose regions apply restrictions/quarantines are highly dependent on assistance from the government. This paper is a study and analysis of one question how the death penalty can be applied to perpetrators of corruption during the Covid-19 outbreak or pandemic. In the criminal law that applies in Indonesia, the death penalty for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is contained in Article 2 paragraph 2 of Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, corruption is categorized as jarimah ta'zir. The results of this study conclude that during a pandemic, the death penalty can be applied to corruptors in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-Corruption Law and the provisions of Islamic criminal law as jarimah ta'zir. There are fundamental differences in the application of the death penalty for corruptors according to positive law and Islamic criminal law, especially with regard to the conditions required for the imposition of the death penalty. Even though this seems cruel according to human rights supporters, this needs to be a concern for all law enforcers so that they can carry out strict law enforcement against perpetrators of corruption crimes during the pandemic.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-123
Author(s):  
Fadly Andrianto
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
The Political ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Current Development ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Second Amendment ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Article 50 ◽  
Article 5

This study aims to determine the development of legal certainty issues within the scope of law in Indonesia. This research uses normative juridical research methods. The results of the research are that in the discussion of the Second Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia NRI Article 28I (1) which contains legal certainty is basically proposed based on the political objectives of a particular group and does not answer the issue of legal certainty that actually occurs in Indonesia between positive law and customary law of the Indonesian people. The issue of legal certainty in Indonesia between positive law and customary law of the Indonesian people in its development was then resolved by Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, namely in Article 5 paragraph (1) and Article 50 paragraph (1). Furthermore, with the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages. Current development regarding the issue of legal certainty in Indonesia is in the RUU KUHP.Keywords: Legal Certainty; Positive Law; Customary Law  Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan isu kepastian hukum dalam ruang lingkup hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yaitu bahwa dalam pembahasan Amandemen Kedua UUD NRI 1945 Pasal 28I ayat (1) yang memuat tentang kepastian hukum pada dasarnya diajukan berdasarkan tujuan politis suatu golongan tertentu dan tidak menjawab mengenai isu kepastian hukum yang sebenarnya terjadi di Indonesia antara hukum positif dan hukum adat masyarakat Indonesia. Isu kepastian hukum di Indonesia antara hukum positif dan hukum adat masyarakat Indonesia dalam perkembangannya kemudian diselesaikan dengan UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman yaitu dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) dan Pasal 50 ayat (1). Selanjutnya dengan diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Perkembangan saat ini mengenai isu kepastian hukum yang ada di Indonesia yaitu dalam RUU KUHP. Kata Kunci: Kepastian Hukum; Hukum Positif; Hukum Adat 

scholarly journals HARMONISASI PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djoko Sumaryanto
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Burden Of Proof ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Meeting Point

This legal research is carried out aimed at finding a common ground and meeting point of reversing the burden of proof  to obtain clarity, firmness, and legal certainty and not to violate human rights. The system of reversing the burden of proof of corruption is  proof beyond the norm of the evidence system in Indonesia, besides that the application of the reversal of the burden of proof tends to violate human rights (HAM). This legal research uses the normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study concluded that between the legislation resulting from the ratification Act has a different character, so that the reversal of the burden of proof needs to be harmonized so that in its implementation there is no overlapping. Keywords: Corruption; Harmonization; Proof. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan bertujuan untuk mencari suatu kesamaan dan titik temu dari pembalikan beban pembuktian agar diperoleh kejelasan, ketegasan, dan kepastian hukum serta tidak melanggar HAM. Sistem pembalikan beban pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi merupakan pembuktian diluar kelaziman sistem pembuktian di Indonesia, disamping hal tersebut penerapan pembalikan beban pembuktian cederung melanggar hak asasi manusia (HAM). Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative dengan pendekatan Perundang-undangan (Statute Approach) dan pendekatan konsep (Conseptual Approach). Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa antara undang-undang hasil legislasi dengan Undang-undang hasil ratifikasi memiliki karakter yang berbeda-beda, sehingga pembalikan beban pembuktian perlu dilakukan harmonisasi, agar dalam pelaksanaannya tidak terjadi tumpang tindih (overlapping).Kata Kunci: Harmonisasi; Korupsi; Pembuktian.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document