scholarly journals Small Group Learning in Otorhinolaryngology Using Clinical Cases in Medical Students

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-57
Author(s):  
Vanita Sarin
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (S5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Safaa El Bialy ◽  
Mohammad Jay ◽  
Yamilee Hebert ◽  
Neraj Manhas ◽  
Dalia Karol

Lecture has historically been a core method used for content delivery in healthcare profession education. However, lecture attendance has decreased within the recent generations of students. The current study focus was to assess the medical and nursing students’ perceptions regarding lecture attendance. To assist with this, second year medical (110/320) and nursing students (95/215) were requested to answer a 10-item survey. The results show that the top reasons why medical and nursing students attended lectures, respectively included: “lectures were mandatory” (81.8% and 68.8%), “socializing with peers” (68.2% and 30.1%), and “professor emphasized important points” (67.3% and 90.3%).  While some reasons for students not attending lectures were that the lecture format was not effective (63.5% and 67.7%), students preferred to use recordings of the lectures (43.3% and 18.1%). Overall, 64.6% of medical students and 63.4% of nursing students agree that traditional lectures are an effective way of learning.  Sixty two percent of medical students (62% n=68) of medical students stated that traditional lectures is their preferred method of learning compared to flipped classroom (27%), small group learning (30%), and online learning (31%). While (39%) of nursing students stated that traditional lectures is their preferred method of learning compared to flipped classroom (21.5% ), small group learning (3.2%), and online learning (7.4%). The results suggest that there is variability in students’ preferred learning style. While some prefer the face-to-face interaction with the professor, other students favour studying at their own pace. The majority of medical and nursing students think traditional lectures continue to play a major educational role.


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
ShubhoSubrata Biswas ◽  
Vaishali Jain ◽  
Vandana Agrawal ◽  
Maninder Bindra

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Levinson ◽  
Diane Kelly ◽  
Krisoula Zahariou ◽  
Matthew Johnson ◽  
Christine Jackman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-684
Author(s):  
Kunatip Sutthiyuth ◽  
Preechaya Wongkrajang ◽  
Wimol Chinswangwatanakul

Small group learning (SGL) is a discussion-based teaching strategy that can improve critical thinking, analytical skills, problem-solving, and interpersonal skills. This study aimed to evaluate student satisfaction in two SGL models among third-year medical students enrolled in a blood and lymphoid systems II course at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University in Bangkok, Thailand. A total of 318 students were divided into 12 groups, and each group had one facilitator. All included students and groups were exposed to both the central summary (CS) model and the individual facilitator summary (IFS) model (both SGLs). A questionnaire was developed to evaluate student rating of learning activities, perceived benefit, timing, workload, and satisfaction. Medical students rated the IFS model superior to the CS model for four of five parameters [confidence in performing and interpreting a laboratory test (83.6% vs. 78.8%), guidance for self-learning (52% vs. 39.5%), increased understanding of a disease (87.7% vs. 72.1%), and application of knowledge (77.4% vs. 70.2%), respectively]. Moreover, the IFS model was rated as having more suitable timing and workload and better satisfaction than the CS model. The results of this study suggest a strong preference for the IFS model over the CS model among medical students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Heather Armson ◽  
Keith Wycliffe-Jones ◽  
Maria Palacios Mackay ◽  
Stefanie Roder

Background and Objectives: Medical educators have expressed interest in using less didactic and more interactive formats for academic half-days (AHDs) in postgraduate residency training. We assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a practice-based small-group learning (PBSGL) process as one part of AHDs. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used. Over a two-year period, family medicine residents at the University of Calgary took part in PBSGL sessions during their AHDs, discussing clinical cases presented in evidence-based educational modules and reflecting on clinical experiences with the guidance of a trained peer facilitator. Data sources to explore experiences with the PBSGL process included an evaluation questionnaire, a practice reflection tool (PRT; documenting patient management plans) and individual interviews (n=19) with residents and faculty preceptors. Results: Of 148 residents, 139 (93%) agreed to participate. Participants were divided into groups of 14-16 members to discuss 12 different module topics. Participants indicated that ongoing small-group interactions were helpful in meeting learning needs and provided opportunities to share and learn from experiences of others in a safe environment. Group facilitation by residents was successful. Level of resident participation and time to preread modules were factors contributing to successful small-group interactions. Modules were rated as effective learning tools, and sample cases were perceived as representing typical cases encountered in practice. Although participants intended to apply their learning to practice, follow through was hindered by lack of relevant clinical cases. Conclusions: Ongoing small-group learning facilitated by residents, coupled with evidence-based educational materials, was a feasible approach to AHDs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document