Author(s):  
Megumi Tahira ◽  
Koki Arai

Abstract This article discusses international cooperation in merger control enforcement under competition law. It describes the framework of merger control in Japan, recent developments in international agreements, merger cases involving international cooperation and the relevant governing authorities’ standard process, including waiver considerations. This article offers three contributions. First, it comments on international cooperation in merger control, including the necessity of confidentiality waivers. Second, it provides basic information for assessing the appropriateness and transparency of merger control policies. Finally, it encourages cooperation between young and advanced competition authorities. The article’s deep understanding of merger activity is based on a detailed analysis of the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s guidelines for international cooperation in merger control.


2011 ◽  
Vol 110-116 ◽  
pp. 3688-3695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kafash Hoshiar ◽  
Mohamad Reza Khalili ◽  
Mahmood Hashemi Nejad ◽  
Hafez Raeisi Fard

In this article a model to describe relation between AFM cantilever’s deformation and force (as a force transducer) is developed. Furthermore a state space model is used to find suitable feedback control. A model which relates force and deformation is described. To verify a Finite element simulation is applied and a control algorithm for manipulation purpose is found. Moreover based on nature of the process control system is designed. Due to recent developments in AFM nanorobot applications in biotechnology and manufacturing nanostructures, understanding of cantilever’s response and process control have received great importance.


Author(s):  
Ingo L. O. Schmidt

SummaryOn September 21, 1990 the European Merger Control System became effective. The author discusses three problems that have arisen in the European debate on establishing a supra-national merger control, namely, the question of:- turnover thresholds to institute control proceedings,- purely competitive or a mixed competitive-industrial policy criterion a la France to take action against anti-competitive mergers, and- residual national jurisdiction should a national market dominant position be created rather than a Community-wide restraint of trade.Finally, the author tries to evaluate the decisions taken by the European Commission up to the end of 1995 and proposes institutional changes in the merger control system, as the workability of the existing system can only be improved by making use of institutional economics.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Frampton

Abstract Although the application of active control to vibrations has been investigated from many years, the extension of this technology to large-scale systems has been thwarted, in part, by an overwhelming need for computational effort, data transmission and electrical power. This need has been overwhelming in the sense that the potential applications are unable to bear the power, weight and complex communications requirement of large-scale centralized control systems. Recent developments in MEMS devices and networked embedded devices have changed the focus of such applications from centralized control architectures to decentralized ones. A decentralized control system is one that consists of many autonomous, or semi-autonomous, localized controllers called nodes, acting on a single plant, in order to achieve a global control objective. Each of these nodes has the following capabilities and assets: 1) a relatively limited computational capability including limited memory, 2) oversight of a suite of sensors and actuators and 3) a communications link (either wired or wireless) with neighboring or regional nodes. The objective of a decentralized controller is the same as for a centralized control system: to maintain some desirable global system behavior in the presences of disturbances. However, decentralized controllers do so with each node possessing only a limited amount of information on the global systems response. Exactly what information each node has access to, and how that information is used, is the topic of this investigation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-161
Author(s):  
G. Drauz ◽  
P. McGeown ◽  
B. Record

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document