Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative--Status of Implementation

Policy Papers ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 2014 (31) ◽  
Author(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (86) ◽  
Author(s):  

This paper presents an assessment of Somalia’s eligibility for assistance under the enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. The macroeconomic framework reflects the policy framework underlying the proposed three-year Fund-supported program. The debt relief analysis (DRA) remains largely unchanged, but some of the underlying debt data has been updated to reflect new information from creditors. In addition, this paper presents an assessment of debt management capacity in Somalia and a full Debt Sustainability Analysis under the Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries. The DRA reveals that, after traditional debt relief mechanisms are applied, Somalia’s debt burden expressed as the net present value of debt-to-exports ratio is 344.2 percent at the end of December 2018—significantly above the HIPC Initiative threshold. Despite the challenging environment, progress on reform and policy implementation has been good and sustained reforms have translated into economic results. In addition to the coordinated support from the World Bank and the IMF, reforms have been supported by other development partners.


Policy Papers ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (86) ◽  
Author(s):  

This report provides an update on the status of implementation of the HIPC Initiative and the MDRI over the past year. Given that most HIPCs have reached the completion point, in November 2011, the IMF and IDA Boards2 endorsed staff’s proposal to further streamline reporting of progress under the HIPC Initiative and MDRI. It was agreed that the annual HIPC Initiative/MDRI status of implementation report will be discontinued, while the core information—on debt service and poverty reducing expenditure, the cost of debt relief, creditor participation rates, and litigation against HIPCs—should continue to be made available and updated regularly on the IMF and World Bank websites.


Policy Papers ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  

This paper provides an update on the delivery of HIPC Initiative debt relief by non- Paris Club official bilateral creditors and proposes measures to increase their participation. It finds that non-Paris Club creditors have provided about one third of the total HIPC Initiative debt relief expected from them, with significant variations among creditors. Although the response rate to the survey sent by staffs of the Bank and the Fund to creditors was higher than in previous years, the information received is still limited and partial, and the estimate of debt relief delivered remains preliminary.


Policy Papers ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2007 (40) ◽  
Author(s):  

This report provides an update on the status of implementation, impact and costs of the enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative and the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) since mid-2006. It also discusses the status of creditor participation in both initiatives and the issue of litigation of commercial creditors against HIPCs.


Subject Multilateral debt relief options. Significance At the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) presented a proposal for multilateral debt relief for Caribbean island states. Barbados's finance minister, Chris Sinckler, has since called for the region to be granted no less favourable debt relief than that made available under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative in the 1990s. Impacts Caribbean countries cite debt reduction as indispensable to tackle both socioeconomic stability and global risks such as climate change. However, securing broad support for debt reduction will be difficult. The question of conditionality will be a vexed one.


Policy Papers ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2006 (47) ◽  
Author(s):  

This paper responds to the Boards’ request to present a proposal addressing country eligibility under the HIPC Initiative sunset clause and discuss related issues. It builds on an informal note to the Boards which explored a number of options to deal with the sunset clause of the HIPC Initiative, which is scheduled to take effect at end-2006. It addresses the concerns raised by Directors in their discussion of the note in July 2006 and proposes that the sunset clause be allowed to take effect and the countries that are assessed to have met the income and indebtedness criteria based on end-2004 data be grandfathered. In response to concerns raised by Directors, it also discusses the issue of a permanent exit from the Initiative for countries wishing to do so.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document