scholarly journals The Method for Optimum Design of Resin Injection Molding Process Conditions using Multivariate Analysis with Robust Parameter Design

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Eiji Toma

In recent years, the demand for plastic products has increased, and along with the deepening of academics, mass production, weight reduction, and high precision are progressing. In the fields of design development and production technology, there are many issues related to quality assurance such as molding defects and product strength. In particular, in the resin molding process, there is a high degree of freedom in product shape and mold structure, and it is an important issue to create quality functions that apply analysis of complex multidimensional information. In this study, the important factors of the resin molding process related to the optimization of resin strength are extracted by applying the multivariate analysis method and robust parameter design. As a result of verification of the proposed method, it is clarified that uniformization of the resin filling density in the mold is extremely important for stabilizing the resin strength.

Author(s):  
Sornkrit Leartcheongchowasak ◽  
Merwan Mehta ◽  
Hamid Al-Kadi ◽  
Keith Sequeira ◽  
Brian Snow ◽  
...  

Abstract The most important problem, causing defective parts, in the injection molding process, is nonuniform shrinkage of molded parts. This leads to an iterative trial-and-error cycles of modification of mold cavity and core to arrive at the right dimensional size required which can occasionally to complete retooling. For this process, there are many factors that can be thrown out of control. Using the traditional scientific approach, engineers have longed to understand the mechanics of the process to control it, with limited success. In this paper, a design of experiments setup, using the Taguchi Methods, was done to reduce the nonuniform shrinkage. The company where the experiment was carried out is a precision parts molder for their own product lines. By using the internal experts from the company, a list of independent process parameters with no interactions which were thought the most responsible for dimensional size were listed. As there were 13 such parameters, it was decided to use the L27 orthogonal array. The optimum value that the company experts thought would produce the right part were used as the settings for the initial experiment. The 27 experiments were then performed, allowing sufficient time to let the machine stabilized between the experiments. The S/N ratio calculation for 27 experiments was explained. Next the calculations for the percentage that each parameter contributes to the dimension was determined. Finally, a confirmation experiment was performed to verify the results.


2008 ◽  
Vol 138 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Pickle ◽  
Timothy J. Robinson ◽  
Jeffrey B. Birch ◽  
Christine M. Anderson-Cook

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Aili Cheng ◽  
John Peterson ◽  
Pallavi Chitturi

One of the key issues in robust parameter design is to configure the controllable factors to minimize the variance due to noise variables. However, it can sometimes happen that the number of control variables is greater than the number of noise variables. When this occurs, two important situations arise. One is that the variance due to noise variables can be brought down to zero The second is that multiple optimal control variable settings become available to the experimenter. A simultaneous confidence region for such a locus of points not only provides a region of uncertainty about such a solution, but also provides a statistical test of whether or not such points lie within the region of experimentation or a feasible region of operation. However, this situation requires a confidence region for the multiple-solution factor levels that provides proper simultaneous coverage. This requirement has not been previously recognized in the literature. In the case where the number of control variables is greater than the number of noise variables, we show how to construct critical values needed to maintain the simultaneous coverage rate. Two examples are provided as a demonstration of the practical need to adjust the critical values for simultaneous coverage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document