scholarly journals RENAL VEIN THROMBOSIS AT HIGH ALTITUDE

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl-1) ◽  
pp. S268-70
Author(s):  
Abdul Rehman Arshad ◽  
Farrukh Islam ◽  
Mohsin Qayyum

Though risk of venous thromboembolism in increased at high altitude, involvement of renal veins is rare. A 27-year-old soldier was evacuated from a height of 18000 feet after developing flank pain and haematuria. Ultrasound showed an enlarged left kidney and lack of flow in proximal renal vein. CT scan confirmed the presence of renal vein thrombus. Serum IgM Anti β-2 Glycoprotein I antibodies, IgG Anti β-2 Glycoprotein I antibodies and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies were detectable and the former two were present after three months also. Secondary causes of antiphospholipid syndrome were excluded. He was started on low molecular weight heparin and is now on lifelong oral anticoagulation with warfarin.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e244726
Author(s):  
Mragank Gaur ◽  
Jasmine Sethi ◽  
Manphool Singhal

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faouzi Mallat ◽  
Wissem Hmida ◽  
Mehdi Jaidane ◽  
Nadia Mama ◽  
Faouzi Mosbah

Isolated renal vein thrombosis is a rare entity. We present a patient whose complaint of flank pain led to the diagnosis of a renal vein thrombosis. In this case, abdominal computed tomography angiography was helpful in diagnosing the nutcracker syndrome complicated by the renal vein thrombosis. Anticoagulation was started and three weeks later, CTA showed complete disappearance of the renal vein thrombosis. To treat the Nutcracker syndrome, we proposed left renal vein transposition that the patient consented to.


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth F Daher ◽  
Geraldo B Silva ◽  
Gabriela S Galdino ◽  
Denislene S Eduardo ◽  
Tatiana P Wanderley ◽  
...  

Patients with nephrotic syndrome presents a high risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, mainly deep vein thrombosis and renal vein thrombosis (RVT). We describe two cases of patients with diagnosis of membranous nephropathy and RVT. The first patient was 32 years, male, and admitted with nephrotic syndrome. Laboratory tests showed urea 16mg/dL, creatinine 0.9mg/dL; proteinuria 17g/day. Abdominal ultrasound evidenced obstruction of right and left renal veins and left inferior vena cava. Renal biopsy was compatible with membranous nephropathy. The second patient, a 27 years old male was admitted with nephritic syndrome. Laboratory tests at admission showed urea 25mg/dL; creatinine 1.1mg/dL; 24h proteinuria 3.86g, abdominal ultrasound showed endoluminal obstruction of left renal vein and increased size left kidney. Renal biopsy showed membranous nephropathy. RVT is not common in patients with nephrotic syndrome, and it is more frequent in membranous nephropathy. Treatment includes intravenous anticoagulant followed by oral drugs. Prophylaxis in nephritic patients is controversial. Keyword: Nephrotic syndrome; Thrombosis; Membranous glomerulonephritis; Blood coagulation DOI: 10.3329/jom.v12i1.5919J Medicine 2011; 12 : 73-76


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anusha Skandini Ganeshan ◽  
Angel Alberto Calderon Chongo

The Renal Vein Thrombosis (RVT) is a rare pathology in adults as compared to children. It is usually present as a complication of other conditions as sepsis, hypercoagulable state, and malignancy. We present a male of age of 36 years, who suffered from RVT following pyelonephritis. Following all investigations, including blood tests, Computed Tomography (CT) of abdomen and CT angiogram, the concluding diagnosis of left RVT was made. Subsequent to confirmation of diagnosis, he was commenced an anticoagulation therapy with the low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin. Consequently, the patient was discharged home with regular follow-ups on an outpatient basis with PT/INR checks. After 3 months, a control CT renal angiogram was performed, which revealed complete resolution of the Left RVT.  In conclusion of this patient case, it can be stated that RVT is a rare condition which can have a good outcome with early diagnosis and subsequent appropriate anticoagulant therapy. In a view of this case, the review of the topic was made.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 937.e1-937.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shumpei Onishi ◽  
Toshihisa Ichiba ◽  
Takeshi Nagata ◽  
Hiroshi Naito

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick ◽  
Joseph J. Gemmete ◽  
Anthony N. Hage ◽  
Jacob J. Bundy ◽  
Charles Brewerton ◽  
...  

Purpose: To determine if stent placement across the renal vein inflow affects kidney function and renal vein patency. Methods: Between June 2008 and September 2016, 93 patients (mean age 39 years, range 15–70; 54 women) with iliocaval occlusion underwent venous stent placement and were retrospectively reviewed. For this analysis, the patients were separated into treatment and control groups: 51 (55%) patients had suprarenal and infrarenal iliocaval venous disease requiring inferior vena cava stent reconstruction across the renal vein inflow (treatment group) and 42 (45%) patients had iliac vein stenting sparing the renal veins (control group). Treatment group patients received Wallstents (n=15), Gianturco Z-stents (n=24), or suprarenal and infrarenal Wallstents such that the renal veins were bracketed with a “renal gap” (n=12). Stenting technical success, stent type, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and creatinine before and after stent placement were recorded, along with renal vein patency and complications. Results: All procedures were technically successful. In the 51-patient treatment group, 15 (29%) patients received Wallstents and 24 (47%) received Gianturco Z-stents across the renal veins, while 12 (24%) were given a “renal gap” with no stent placement directly across the renal vein inflow. In the control group, 42 patients received iliac vein Wallstents only. Mean prestent GFR was 59±1.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and mean prestent creatinine was 0.8±0.2 mg/dL for the entire cohort. Mean prestent GFR and creatinine values in the Wallstent, Gianturco Z-stent, and “renal gap” subgroups did not differ from the iliac vein stent group. Mean poststent GFR and creatinine values were 59±3.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 0.8±0.3 mg/dL, respectively. There were no differences between mean pre- and poststent GFR (p=0.32) or creatinine (p=0.41) values when considering all patients or when comparing the treatment subgroups and the control group. There were no differences in the poststent mean GFR or creatinine values between the Wallstent (p=0.21 and p=0.34, respectively) and Gianturco Z-stent (p=0.43 and p=0.41, respectively) groups and the “renal gap” group. One patient with a Wallstent across the renal veins developed right renal vein thrombosis 7 days after the procedure. Conclusion: Stent placement across the renal vein inflow did not compromise renal function. A very small risk of renal vein thrombosis was seen.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 734-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ranch ◽  
Michael O. Aigbe ◽  
Emmanuel C. Gorospe

Prenatal calcification of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and renal veins is a rare condition with unclear etiology and prognosis. It occurs with renal vein thrombosis in utero and is associated with congenital anomalies and abnormal prenatal hemodynamic status. We report a rare case of prenatal IVC and renal vein calcification in a normal neonate without any history of compromised prenatal or perinatal condition, or significant deterioration of kidney function.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document