scholarly journals Cluster observations of sudden impulses in the magnetotail caused by interplanetary shocks and pressure increases

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. J. Huttunen ◽  
J. Slavin ◽  
M. Collier ◽  
H. E. J. Koskinen ◽  
A. Szabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Interplanetary Shock ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Shock Propagation ◽  
Interplanetary Shocks ◽  
Maximum Variance ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. Sudden impulses (SI) in the tail lobe magnetic field associated with solar wind pressure enhancements are investigated using measurements from Cluster. The magnetic field components during the SIs change in a manner consistent with the assumption that an antisunward moving lateral pressure enhancement compresses the magnetotail axisymmetrically. We found that the maximum variance SI unit vectors were nearly aligned with the associated interplanetary shock normals. For two of the tail lobe SI events during which Cluster was located close to the tail boundary, Cluster observed the inward moving magnetopause. During both events, the spacecraft location changed from the lobe to the magnetospheric boundary layer. During the event on 6 November 2001 the magnetopause was compressed past Cluster. We applied the 2-D Cartesian model developed by collier98 in which a vacuum uniform tail lobe magnetic field is compressed by a step-like pressure increase. The model underestimates the compression of the magnetic field, but it fits the magnetic field maximum variance component well. For events for which we could determine the shock normal orientation, the differences between the observed and calculated shock propagation times from the location of WIND/Geotail to the location of Cluster were small. The propagation speeds of the SIs between the Cluster spacecraft were comparable to the solar wind speed. Our results suggest that the observed tail lobe SIs are due to lateral increases in solar wind dynamic pressure outside the magnetotail boundary.

scholarly journals Solar wind and substorm excitation of the wavy current sheet

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2457-2474 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Forsyth ◽  
M. Lester ◽  
R. C. Fear ◽  
E. Lucek ◽  
I. Dandouras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Current Sheet ◽  
Pressure Pulse ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Expansion Velocity ◽  
Solar Wind Pressure ◽  
Wave Models ◽  
Best Fit ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. Following a solar wind pressure pulse on 3 August 2001, GOES 8, GOES 10, Cluster and Polar observed dipolarizations of the magnetic field, accompanied by an eastward expansion of the aurora observed by IMAGE, indicating the occurrence of two substorms. Prior to the first substorm, the motion of the plasma sheet with respect to Cluster was in the ZGSM direction. Observations following the substorms show the occurrence of current sheet waves moving predominantly in the −YGSM direction. Following the second substorm, the current sheet waves caused multiple current sheet crossings of the Cluster spacecraft, previously studied by Zhang et al. (2002). We further this study to show that the velocity of the current sheet waves was similar to the expansion velocity of the substorm aurora and the expansion of the dipolarization regions in the magnetotail. Furthermore, we compare these results with the current sheet wave models of Golovchanskaya and Maltsev (2005) and Erkaev et al. (2008). We find that the Erkaev et al. (2008) model gives the best fit to the observations.

scholarly journals Induced and Permanent Magnetism on the Moon: Structural and Evolutionary Implications

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 173-188
Author(s):  
C. P. Sonett ◽  
P. Dyal ◽  
D. S. Colburn ◽  
B. F. Smith ◽  
G. Schubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Dark Side ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Permanent Magnetic Field ◽  
Crustal Layer ◽  
Induced Field ◽  
Solar Wind Pressure

AbstractIt is shown that the Moon possesses an extraordinary response to induction from the solar wind due to a combination of a high interior electrical conductivity together with a relatively resistive crustal layer into which the solar wind dynamic pressure forces back the induced field. The dark side response, devoid of solar wind pressure, is approximately that expected for the vacuum case. These data permit an assessment of the interior conductivity and an estimate of the thermal gradient in the crustal region. The discovery of a large permanent magnetic field at the Apollo 12 site corresponds approximately to the paleomagnetic residues discovered in both Apollo 11 and 12 rock samples The implications regarding an early lunar magnetic field are discussed and it is shown that among the various conjectures regarding the early field the most prominent are either an interior dynamo or an early approach to the Earth though no extant model is free of difficulties.

scholarly journals Magnetosheath dynamic pressure enhancements: occurrence and typical properties

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. O. Archer ◽  
T. S. Horbury
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Wavelet Transforms ◽  
Large Amplitude ◽  
Statistical Study ◽  
Average Duration ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Random Events ◽  
Fractional Increase ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. The first comprehensive statistical study of large-amplitude (> 100%) transient enhancements of the magnetosheath dynamic pressure reveals events of up to ~ 15 times the ambient dynamic pressure with durations up to 3 min and an average duration of around 30 s, predominantly downstream of the quasi-parallel shock. The dynamic pressure transients are most often dominated by velocity increases along with a small fractional increase in the density, though the velocity is generally only deflected by a few degrees. Superposed wavelet transforms of the magnetic field show that, whilst most enhancements exhibit changes in the magnetosheath magnetic field, the majority are not associated with changes in the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF). However, there is a minority of enhancements that do appear to be associated with solar wind discontinuities which cannot be explained simply by random events. In general, it is found that during periods of magnetosheath dynamic pressure enhancements the IMF is steadier than usual. This suggests that a stable foreshock and hence foreshock structures or processes may be important in the generation of the majority of magnetosheath dynamic pressure enhancements.

scholarly journals Interplanetary magnetic field rotations followed from L1 to the ground: the response of the Earth's magnetosphere as seen by multi-spacecraft and ground-based observations

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1549-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Volwerk ◽  
J. Berchem ◽  
Y. V. Bogdanova ◽  
O. D. Constantinescu ◽  
M. W. Dunlop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Earth’S Magnetosphere ◽  
Solar Wind Magnetic Field ◽  
Earth's Magnetosphere ◽  
High Dynamic ◽  
First Time ◽  
Current Systems ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Abstract. A study of the interaction of solar wind magnetic field rotations with the Earth's magnetosphere is performed. For this event there is, for the first time, a full coverage over the dayside magnetosphere with multiple (multi)spacecraft missions from dawn to dusk, combined with ground magnetometers, radar and an auroral camera, this gives a unique coverage of the response of the Earth's magnetosphere. After a long period of southward IMF Bz and high dynamic pressure of the solar wind, the Earth's magnetosphere is eroded and compressed and reacts quickly to the turning of the magnetic field. We use data from the solar wind monitors ACE and Wind and from magnetospheric missions Cluster, THEMIS, DoubleStar and Geotail to investigate the behaviour of the magnetic rotations as they move through the bow shock and magnetosheath. The response of the magnetosphere is investigated through ground magnetometers and auroral keograms. It is found that the solar wind magnetic field drapes over the magnetopause, while still co-moving with the plasma flow at the flanks. The magnetopause reacts quickly to IMF Bz changes, setting up field aligned currents, poleward moving aurorae and strong ionospheric convection. Timing of the structures between the solar wind, magnetosheath and the ground shows that the advection time of the structures, using the solar wind velocity, correlates well with the timing differences between the spacecraft. The reaction time of the magnetopause and the ionospheric current systems to changes in the magnetosheath Bz seem to be almost immediate, allowing for the advection of the structure measured by the spacecraft closest to the magnetopause.

The asymmetric geospace response to rapid changes in solar wind pressure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Madelaire ◽  
Karl Laundal ◽  
Jone Reistad ◽  
Spencer Hatch ◽  
Anders Ohma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Interplanetary Shock ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Field Orientation ◽  
Superposed Epoch Analysis ◽  
Rapid Changes ◽  
Solar Wind Structure ◽  
Solar Wind Pressure ◽  
The Impact

<p>The geospace response to rapid changes in solar wind pressure results in a perturbation of the magnetospheric-ionospheric system. Ground magnetometer stations located at polar latitudes have long been known to measure a sudden impulse only minutes after a solar wind structure reaches the magnetopause.<br>Here a list of events associated with a step-like feature in the solar wind dynamic pressure between 1994 and 2020 is compiled based on in situ observations from ACE and Wind. Arrival time estimates are calculated using a simple propagation method and validated with a correlation analysis using SYM-H from low/mid latitude stations. A superposed epoch analysis is carried out to investigate the impact of season, interplanetary magnetic field orientation and other attributes pertaining to the interplanetary shock. All available ground magnetometer stations in SuperMAG, during each event, are used allowing for global coverage. <br>Global data coverage is important for this kind of comparative analysis as it is needed to determine changes in the systems response due to e.g. season, which might lead to an improved understanding of the magnetospheric-ionospheric-thermospheric coupling.</p>

Magnetic field within magnetosheath jets during northward and southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Vuorinen ◽  
Heli Hietala ◽  
Ferdinand Plaschke
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Time History ◽  
Magnetic Shear ◽  
History Of ◽  
High Dynamic ◽  
The Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetopause Reconnection

<p>Downstream of the Earth's quasi-parallel shock, transients with higher earthward velocities than the surrounding magnetosheath plasma are often observed. These transients have been named magnetosheath jets. Due to their high dynamic pressure, jets can cause multiple types of effects when colliding into the magnetopause. Recently, jets have been linked to triggering magnetopause reconnection in case studies by Hietala et al. (2018) and Nykyri et al. (2019). Jets have been proposed to affect magnetopause reconnection in multiple ways. Jets can compress the magnetopause and make it thin enough for reconnection to occur. Jets could also affect the magnetic shear either by indenting the magnetopause or via the magnetic field of the jets themselves. Here we want to study whether the magnetic field of jets can statistically affect magnetopause reconnection. In particular, we are interested in whether jets could enhance reconnection during more quiet northward IMF conditions.</p><p>We statistically study the magnetic field within jets in the subsolar magnetosheath using measurements from the five Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) spacecraft and OMNI solar wind data from 2008–2011. We investigate jets next to the magnetopause and find that the magnetic field within jets is statistically different compared to the non-jet magnetosheath. Our results suggest that during southward IMF, the non-jet magnetosheath magnetic field itself has more variation than the jets. This suggests that jets should have no statistical, neither enhancing nor suppressing, effect on reconnection during southward IMF. However, during northward IMF, the magnetic field within jets is statistically favorable for enhancing magnetic reconnection at the subsolar magnetopause as around 70 % of these jets exhibit southward fields close to the magnetopause.</p>

Long-term properties of the solar wind and their relation to solar cycles

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Salohub ◽  
Jana Šafránkova ◽  
Zdeněk Němeček ◽  
Lubomír Přech ◽  
Tereza Ďurovcová
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Dynamic Pressure ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Solar Wind Plasma ◽  
Solar Cycles ◽  
Plasma Parameters ◽  
Wind Spacecraft ◽  
Slow Wind ◽  
Density Dynamic

<p>The solar wind variations during particular solar cycles have been described in many previous studies including the solar cycle 23 that was characterized by a long, deep, and very complex solar minimum with very low values of many solar wind parameters.</p><p>Using statistical methods, we analyzed 25 years of Wind spacecraft measurements with motivation to reveal differences and similarities in magnetic field components and solar wind plasma parameters in individual solar cycles. We tracked the changes of the solar magnetic field strength, and components, solar wind speed, density, dynamic pressure, temperature, and composition). Except quiet solar wind conditions during solar minima and maxima, we also selected significant discontinuities (ICME and CIRs) and investigated their influence on profiles of average parameters. For this, we followed other quantities connected with their presence as their average front normals, regions of transitions between high and slow wind streams, special interplanetary magnetic field orientations, etc.). We discuss a behavior of investigated parameters over solar cycles as well as on shorter time scales (in the order of days and hours).</p>

Solar cycle variations in differential instrumental responses from ground‑based geomagnetic records

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Gilder ◽  
Michael Wack ◽  
Elena Kronberg ◽  
Ameya Prabhu
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Solar Cycle ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Magnetic Measurements ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Maximum Amplitude ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Wide Frequency Range ◽  
The Magnetic Field

<p>We developed a new technique based on differences in instrument responses from ground-based magnetic measurements that extracts the frequency content of the magnetic field with periods ranging from 0.1 to 100 seconds. By stacking hourly averages over an entire year, we found that the maximum amplitude of the magnetic field oscillations occurred near solar noon over diurnal periods at all latitudes except in the auroral oval. Seasonal variability was identified only at high latitude. Long-term trends in field oscillations followed the solar cycle, yet the maxima occurred during the declining phase when high-speed streams in the solar wind dominated. A parameter based on solar wind speed and the relative variability of the interplanetary magnetic field correlated robustly with the ground-based measurements. Our findings suggest that turbulence in the solar wind, its interaction at the magnetopause, and its propagation into the magnetosphere stimulate magnetic field fluctuations at the ground on the dayside over a wide frequency range. Our method enables the study of field line oscillations using the publicly available, worldwide database of geomagnetic observatories.</p>

Characteristics and variability of Titan's magnetic environment

2008 ◽  
Vol 367 (1889) ◽  
pp. 789-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
César L Bertucci
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Current Sheet ◽  
Radial Component ◽  
Wind Pressure ◽  
Rotation Direction ◽  
Background Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind Pressure ◽  
Field Lines ◽  
The Magnetic Field

The structure and variability of Saturn's magnetic field in the vicinity of Titan's orbit is studied. In the dawn magnetosphere, the magnetic field presents a significant radial component directed towards Saturn, suggesting that Titan is usually located below the planet's warped and dynamic magnetodisc. Also, a non-negligible component along the co-rotation direction suggests that Saturn's magnetic field lines close to the magnetodisc are being swept back from their respective magnetic meridians. In the noon sector, Titan seems to be closer to the magnetodisc central current sheet, as the field lines in this region seem to be more dipolar. The distance between the central current sheet and Titan depends mainly on the solar wind pressure. Also, δ | B |/| B |∼0.5 amplitude waveforms at periods close to Saturn's kilometric radiation period are present in the background magnetic field. This modulation in the field is ubiquitous in Saturn's magnetosphere and associated with the presence of a rotating asymmetry in the planet's magnetic field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document