Evaluation of MM5 and HadGEM3-RA hindcast in the CORDEX East Asia Phase Ⅱ: near-surface air temperature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok-Woo Shin ◽  
Dong-Hyun Cha ◽  
Taehyung Kim ◽  
Gayoung Kim ◽  
Changyoung Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Extreme Values ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cordex East Asia

<p>Extreme temperature can have a devastating impact on the ecological environment (i.e., human health and crops) and the socioeconomic system. To adapt to and cope with the rapidly changing climate, it is essential to understand the present climate and to estimate the future change in terms of temperature. In this study, we evaluate the characteristics of near-surface air temperature (SAT) simulated by two regional climate models (i.e., MM5 and HadGEM3-RA) over East Asia, focusing on the mean and extreme values. To analyze extreme climate, we used the indices for daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures among the developed Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI) indices. In the results of the CORDEX-East Asia phase Ⅰ, the mean and extreme values of SAT for DJF (JJA) tend to be colder (warmer) than observation data over the East Asian region. In those of CORDEX-East Asia phase Ⅱ, the mean and extreme values of SAT for DJF and JJA have warmer than those of the CORDEX-East Asia phase Ⅰ except for those of HadGEM3-RA for DJF. Furthermore, the Extreme Temperature Range (ETR, maximum value of Tmax - minimum value of Tmin) of CORDEX-East Asia phase Ⅰ data, which are significantly different from those of observation data, are reduced in that of CORDEX-East Asia phase Ⅱ. Consequently, the high-resolution regional climate models play a role in the improvement of the cold bias having the relatively low-resolution ones. To understand the reasons for the improved and weak points of regional climate models, we investigated the atmospheric field (i.e., flow, air mass, precipitation, and radiation) influencing near-surface air temperature. Model performances for SAT over East Asia were influenced by the expansion of the western North Pacific subtropical high and the location of convective precipitation in JJA and by the contraction of the Siberian high, the spatial distribution of snowfall and associated upwelling longwave radiation in DJF.</p>

Added Value of reproduced precipitation by high resolved regional climate model simulation over CORDEX-East Asia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taehyung Kim ◽  
Dong-Hyun Cha ◽  
Gayoung Kim ◽  
Seok-Woo Shin ◽  
Changyong Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Fine Resolution ◽  
Cordex East Asia

<p>In the framework of the CORDEX-East Asia, evaluation simulations using high-resolution regional climate models (SNURCM and HadGEM3-RA) with ~25km (Phase2) grid scale have been conducted. In this study, we investigate whether the higher-resolution regional climate models (RCMs) can generate added values for summer mean precipitation, large-scale circulation, and extreme precipitation compared to those with lower-resolution (~50km, Phase 1). In addition, the added value index is used to quantitatively analyze the abilities of fine- and coarse-resolution RCMs. Hence, sets of phase 1 and phase 2 simulations of two RCMs are compared to observations in the East Asia region. In SNURCM simulations, positive (negative) added value of summer mean precipitation is reproduced over most ocean (land) region of East Asia in fine-resolution simulation. Extreme precipitation over Korea and Japan is well reproduced in Phase 2 simulations because the simulations of typhoons and East Asia summer monsoon are improved. In HadGEM3-RA simulations, the results of summer mean precipitation over most East Asian regions above 25°N are improved in Phase 2, while worse results are reproduced below 25°N. But, extreme precipitation in fine-resolution simulation is adequately reproduced in most regions of East Asia except China and the Yellow sea. As a result, the results of the simulations are different depending on the characteristics of the individual models, but more positive added values for the intensity and spatial distribution of precipitation over East Asia are generated as the horizontal resolution of RCMs increases.</p><p>This work was funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMI(KMI2018-01211)</p><p> </p>

Evaluation of multiple regional climate models for summer climate extremes over East Asia

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 2469-2486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changyong Park ◽  
Seung-Ki Min ◽  
Donghyun Lee ◽  
Dong-Hyun Cha ◽  
Myoung-Seok Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
East Asia ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Climate Extremes ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Summer Climate

Evaluating temperature extremes in CMIP6 simulations using statistically proper evaluation methods

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thordis Thorarinsdottir ◽  
Jana Sillmann ◽  
Marion Haugen ◽  
Nadine Gissibl ◽  
Marit Sandstad
Keyword(s):  
Air Temperature ◽  
Model Evaluation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Surface Air Temperature ◽  
Cmip5 Models ◽  
Model Output ◽  
Intergovernmental Panel ◽  
Near Surface

<p>Reliable projections of extremes in near-surface air temperature (SAT) by climate models become more and more important as global warming is leading to significant increases in the hottest days and decreases in coldest nights around the world with considerable impacts on various sectors, such as agriculture, health and tourism.</p><p>Climate model evaluation has traditionally been performed by comparing summary statistics that are derived from simulated model output and corresponding observed quantities using, for instance, the root mean squared error (RMSE) or mean bias as also used in the model evaluation chapter of the fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC AR5). Both RMSE and mean bias compare averages over time and/or space, ignoring the variability, or the uncertainty, in the underlying values. Particularly when interested in the evaluation of climate extremes, climate models should be evaluated by comparing the probability distribution of model output to the corresponding distribution of observed data.</p><p>To address this shortcoming, we use the integrated quadratic distance (IQD) to compare distributions of simulated indices to the corresponding distributions from a data product. The IQD is the proper divergence associated with the proper continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) as it fulfills essential decision-theoretic properties for ranking competing models and testing equality in performance, while also assessing the full distribution.</p><p>The IQD is applied to evaluate CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations of monthly maximum (TXx) and minimum near-surface air temperature (TNn) over the data-dense regions Europe and North America against both observational and reanalysis datasets. There is not a notable difference between the model generations CMIP5 and CMIP6 when the model simulations are compared against the observational dataset HadEX2. However, the CMIP6 models show a better agreement with the reanalysis ERA5 than CMIP5 models, with a few exceptions. Overall, the climate models show higher skill when compared against ERA5 than when compared against HadEX2. While the model rankings vary with region, season and index, the model evaluation is robust against changes in the grid resolution considered in the analysis.</p>

Regional Climate Model Inter-Comparison for Antarctica within a Data Science Framework

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy Carter ◽  
Amber Leeson ◽  
Andrew Orr ◽  
Christoph Kittel ◽  
Melchior van Wessem
Keyword(s):  
Regional Climate Model ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Future Climate Change ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Virtual Lab ◽  
Model Variability ◽  
The Antarctic

<p>Understanding the surface climatology of the Antarctic ice sheet is essential if we are to adequately predict its response to future climate change. This includes both primary impacts such as increased ice melting and secondary impacts such as ice shelf collapse events. Given its size, and inhospitable environment, weather stations on Antarctica are sparse. Thus, we rely on regional climate models to 1) develop our understanding of how the climate of Antarctica varies in both time and space and 2) provide data to use as context for remote sensing studies and forcing for dynamical process models. Given that there are a number of different regional climate models available that explicitly simulate Antarctic climate, understanding inter- and intra model variability is important.</p><p>Here, inter- and intra-model variability in Antarctic-wide regional climate model output is assessed for: snowfall; rainfall; snowmelt and near-surface air temperature within a cloud-based virtual lab framework. State-of-the-art regional climate model runs from the Antarctic-CORDEX project using the RACMO, MAR and MetUM models are used, together with the ERA5 and ERA-Interim reanalyses products. Multiple simulations using the same model and domain boundary but run at either different spatial resolutions or with different driving data are used. Traditional analysis techniques are exploited and the question of potential added value from more modern and involved methods such as the use of Gaussian Processes is investigated. The advantages of using a virtual lab in a cloud based environment for increasing transparency and reproducibility, are demonstrated, with a view to ultimately make the code and methods used widely available for other research groups.</p>

scholarly journals Global Radiative Flux and Cloudiness Variability for the Period 1959–2010 in Belgium: A Comparison between Reanalyses and the Regional Climate Model MAR

Atmosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coraline Wyard ◽  
Sébastien Doutreloup ◽  
Alexandre Belleflamme ◽  
Martin Wild ◽  
Xavier Fettweis
Keyword(s):  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Radiative Flux ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Historical Trends ◽  
The Mean

The use of regional climate models (RCMs) can partly reduce the biases in global radiative flux (Eg↓) that are found in reanalysis products and global models, as they allow for a finer spatial resolution and a finer parametrisation of surface and atmospheric processes. In this study, we assess the ability of the MAR («Modèle Atmosphérique Régional») RCM to reproduce observed changes in Eg↓, and we investigate the added value of MAR with respect to reanalyses. Simulations were performed at a horizontal resolution of 5 km for the period 1959–2010 by forcing MAR with different reanalysis products: ERA40/ERA-interim, NCEP/NCAR-v1, ERA-20C, and 20CRV2C. Measurements of Eg↓ from the Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA) and from the Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB), as well as cloud cover observations from Belgocontrol and RMIB, were used for the evaluation of the MAR model and the forcing reanalyses. Results show that MAR enables largely reducing the mean biases that are present in the reanalyses. The trend analysis shows that only MAR forced by ERA40/ERA-interim shows historical trends, which is probably because the ERA40/ERA-interim has a better horizontal resolution and assimilates more observations than the other reanalyses that are used in this study. The results suggest that the solar brightening observed since the 1980s in Belgium has mainly been due to decreasing cloud cover.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document