scholarly journals Comment on "Learning risk management of geohazards in practice with free and open-source web-GIS based platform: RISKGIS"

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anonymous
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-179
Author(s):  
Zar Chi Aye ◽  
Marie Charrière ◽  
Roya Olyazadeh ◽  
Marc-Henri Derron ◽  
Michel Jaboyedoff
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zar Chi Aye ◽  
Roya Olyazadeh ◽  
Marc-Henri Derron ◽  
Michel Jaboyedoff ◽  
Johann Lüthi

Abstract. How do environmental risk systems function? is the main underlying question to be answered by students learning environmental risk. Under the framework of the Innovative Teaching project, an open-source, interactive and collaborative web-GIS application (RISKGIS) is developed for students in learning and understanding of environmental risk systems with a focus on geohazards and risk. The aim is for students to better understand and become familiarized with approaches used by experts as well as for teachers to better evaluate and monitor student learning, through a practical application with real case studies and hand-on exercises. To identify the possibility and applicability of the developed learning platform, a series of practical exercises is carried out with undergraduate and postgraduate students during the spring and autumn semesters of the environmental risk, and advanced risk and vulnerability courses of the University of Lausanne. A total of three exercises are conducted starting from the rapid risk calculation (individual) exercise to more complex risk management (individual and group) exercise with different case studies and functionalities of the learning platform. Depending on the exercises, students are asked to answer the test quiz, feedback questionnaires and group reports (if requested) through the Moodle platform to evaluate the performance of the students, exercises and the RISKGIS platform. Average feedback results from three different exercises revealed that students found the exercises useful and interesting, while a user satisfaction score of 7/10 and a system usability scale (SUS) of 64/100 is achieved, showing that several aspects of the RISKGIS learning platform could be further improved with suggestions and feedback of the students.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. C. Aye ◽  
M. Jaboyedoff ◽  
M. H. Derron ◽  
C. J. van Westen ◽  
H. Y. Hussin ◽  
...  

Abstract. This paper presents a prototype of an interactive web-GIS tool for risk analysis of natural hazards, in particular for floods and landslides, based on open-source geospatial software and technologies. The aim of the presented tool is to assist the experts (risk managers) in analysing the impacts and consequences of a certain hazard event in a considered region, providing an essential input to the decision-making process in the selection of risk management strategies by responsible authorities and decision makers. This tool is based on the Boundless (OpenGeo Suite) framework and its client-side environment for prototype development, and it is one of the main modules of a web-based collaborative decision support platform in risk management. Within this platform, the users can import necessary maps and information to analyse areas at risk. Based on provided information and parameters, loss scenarios (amount of damages and number of fatalities) of a hazard event are generated on the fly and visualized interactively within the web-GIS interface of the platform. The annualized risk is calculated based on the combination of resultant loss scenarios with different return periods of the hazard event. The application of this developed prototype is demonstrated using a regional data set from one of the case study sites, Fella River of northeastern Italy, of the Marie Curie ITN CHANGES project.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-653
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Nemoto ◽  
Shinji Masumoto ◽  
Venkatesh Raghavan ◽  
Susumu Nonogaki ◽  
Fumio Nakada

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Placide Poba-Nzaou ◽  
Louis Raymond ◽  
Bruno Fabi

Purpose – This study aims to explore the process of open source software (OSS) adoption in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and more specifically open source enterprise resource planning (ERP) as a “mission critical” OSS application in manufacturing. It also addresses the fundamental issue of ERP risk management that shapes this process. Design/methodology/approach – The approach is done through an interpretive case study of a small Canadian manufacturer that has adopted an open source ERP system. Findings – Interpreted in the light of the IT risk management, OSS and packaged application adoption literatures, results indicate that the small manufacturer successfully managed the adoption process in a rather intuitive manner, based on one guiding principle and nine practices. In analyzing the data, diffusion of innovation theory appeared to fit rather well with the situation observed and to offer rich insights to explain the mission-critical OSS adoption process. Research limitations/implications – A single case study of successful IT adoption should be eventually counterbalanced by future cases considered to be partial or total failures, using a wider multiple case study approach for comparative purposes. And this should include alternative theoretical interpretations and more detailed empirical work on the extent to which the distinctive features of OSS make its adoption more or less risk-laden. This initial effort should also be followed by further research on mission-critical OSS adoption in contexts other than SMEs (e.g. healthcare organizations) and other than ERP (e.g. customer-relationship management). Practical implications – This research confirms that open source is a credible alternative for SMEs that decide willingly or under external pressure to adopt a mission-critical system such as ERP. Moreover, it suggests that a high level of formalization is not always necessary. Originality/value – The authors argue that rich insights into the dynamics of the mission-critical OSS adoption process can be obtained by framing this process within an IT risk management context.


2013 ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. De Filippis ◽  
L. Rocchi ◽  
E. Fiorillo ◽  
A. Matese ◽  
F. Di Gennaro ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 729-747
Author(s):  
Matt Germonprez ◽  
◽  
Robin A. Gandhi ◽  
Georg Link ◽  
◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Antonia Brovelli ◽  
Helena Mitasova ◽  
Markus Neteler ◽  
Venkatesh Raghavan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document