scholarly journals Immunotherapy and prevention of breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-70
Author(s):  
Neelam Thacker ◽  
Perianayagam Taneja

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and is a leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Despite the significant benefit of the use of conventional chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in the prognosis of breast cancer patients and although the recent approval of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has been a milestone for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, immunologic treatment of breast tumors remains a great challenge. In this review, we summarize current breast cancer classification and standard of care, the main obstacles that hinder the success of immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, as well as different approaches that could be useful to enhance the response of breast tumors to immunotherapies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-70
Author(s):  
Neelam Thacker ◽  
Perianayagam Taneja

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and is a leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Despite the significant benefit of the use of conventional chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in the prognosis of breast cancer patients and although the recent approval of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has been a milestone for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, immunologic treatment of breast tumors remains a great challenge. In this review, we summarize current breast cancer classification and standard of care, the main obstacles that hinder the success of immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, as well as different approaches that could be useful to enhance the response of breast tumors to immunotherapies.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilina García-Aranda ◽  
Maximino Redondo

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and is a leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Despite the significant benefit of the use of conventional chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in the prognosis of breast cancer patients and although the recent approval of the anti-PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy has been a milestone for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, immunologic treatment of breast tumors remains a great challenge. In this review, we summarize current breast cancer classification and standard of care, the main obstacles that hinder the success of immunotherapies in breast cancer patients, as well as different approaches that could be useful to enhance the response of breast tumors to immunotherapies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 31-31
Author(s):  
Gitte Pedersen

31 Background: In the context of diagnostics, RNA is proxy for proteins and proteins are typically targets for drugs; e.g. breast cancer is typically driven by over-expression of various hormone receptors and Her2. In the current standard-of-care setting there is no measurement of mutations. Furthermore, all the markers for response to the new immune therapies are expressed as mRNA. Approximately 15% of the breast cancer patients are triple negative. Due to the poor outcome of chemo, standard-of-care guidelines (NCCN) suggests doctors encourage the patient to enroll in clinical trials. However, with more than 2000 ongoing trials in breast, which trial could potentially benefit the patient? Methods: Using the RNA-seq data from the TCGA study, we analyzed more than 120 triple negative datasets. Results: We found at least one over-expressed checkpoint inhibitor target in almost all the patients, suggesting that if you analyzed for all of the checkpoint targets, it would be possible to find a clinical study for these patients. Furthermore, when we analyzed over-expressed tumor antigens, we realized that it would be possible to design sophisticated combination trials with this information. In addition, we identified patients that were BRCAwt with an impaired DNA repair pathway; e.g. some had BRCA silencing and could potentially benefit from PARP inhibitors. Finally, a small number of patients overexpressed the androgen receptor for which there is a drug approved for prostate cancer. Conclusions: Compared to DNA analysis, tumor RNA profiling has the potential to guide a much broader set of drugs and treatment approaches including immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis can reveal tumor antigens and drug targets expressed by cancer cells, as well as the vital status of the tumor microenvironment including immune response, the integrity of DNA repair mechanisms, and the engagement of angiogenesis and other cancer-related pathways.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14597-e14597
Author(s):  
P. Ordentlich ◽  
L. Tee ◽  
Y. Huynh ◽  
S. Mee ◽  
H. Mamuszka ◽  
...  

e14597 Background: Triple-negative (ER, PR, HER2 negative) breast cancer represents an unmet need for which novel agents and approaches are essential. Entinostat is an orally available, class 1 isoform selective histone deacetylase inhibitor currently in multiple phase 2 clinical studies including advanced NSCLC and breast cancer. Studies in vitro and in vivo in the triple negative cell line model MDA-MB-231 have established single agent activity of entinostat in inhibiting tumor growth as well preventing bone metastases. In addition, entinostat induces expression of ERα in MDA-MB-231 in vivo and is synergistic with endocrine therapy agents to inhibit tumor growth of ER negative cancer cells. The aim of these studies was to confirm the activity of entinostat in triple negative breast cancers using human breast tumor explants. Methods: Cytotoxicity of entinostat was determined by the Oncotech Extreme Drug Resistance (EDR) proliferation assay using ten cryopreserved breast tumor explants known to lack estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2/neu expression (i.e. Triple negative) by immunohistochemistry. Results: Dose response curves of entinostat were analyzed and compared to paclitaxel at 2.45 μM in ten triple negative breast tumor explants in the EDR assay. Entinostat was broadly effective in all of the tumors tested, with most samples showing dose-dependent response for the range of concentrations analyzed (0.003 - 10 μM). Two of the breast tumors that were most sensitive to entinostat (IC50 30- 100nM) were also sensitive to paclitaxel. In contrast, entinostat effectively inhibited (IC50 10–270nM) the growth of eight of the tumors that were resistant to paclitaxel (i.e. < 50% growth inhibition). Overall, all breast tumors tested were sensitive to entinostat at clinically achievable concentrations regardless of paclitaxel resistance indicating entinostat may improve the treatment outcome of triple negative breast cancer patients. Conclusions: Entinostat is an effective agent at inhibiting the growth of triple negative breast tumors with clinically relevant IC50's ranging from 10nM to 270nM. A pre-surgical clinical study to assess the activity of entinostat in triple negative breast cancer patients is planned. [Table: see text]


Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Rudolf Napieralski ◽  
Gabriele Schricker ◽  
Gert Auer ◽  
Michaela Aubele ◽  
Jonathan Perkins ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> PITX2 DNA methylation has been shown to predict outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. To determine its prognostic versus predictive value, the impact of PITX2 DNA methylation on outcomes was studied in an untreated cohort vs. an anthracycline-treated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> The percent DNA methylation ratio (PMR) of paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) was determined by a validated methylation-specific real-time PCR test. Patient samples of routinely collected archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and clinical data from 144 TNBC patients of 2 independent cohorts (i.e., 66 untreated patients and 78 patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy) were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The risk of 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) increased continuously with rising PITX2 DNA methylation in the anthracycline-treated population, but it increased only slightly during 10-year follow-up time in the untreated patient population. PITX2 DNA methylation with a PMR cutoff of 2 did not show significance for poor vs. good outcomes (OS) in the untreated patient cohort (HR = 1.55; <i>p</i> = 0.259). In contrast, the PITX2 PMR cutoff of 2 identified patients with poor (PMR &#x3e;2) vs. good (PMR ≤2) outcomes (OS) with statistical significance in the anthracycline-treated cohort (HR = 3.96; <i>p</i> = 0.011). The results in the subgroup of patients who did receive anthracyclines only (no taxanes) confirmed this finding (HR = 5.71; <i>p</i> = 0.014). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In this hypothesis-generating study PITX2 DNA methylation demonstrated predominantly predictive value in anthracycline treatment in TNBC patients. The risk of poor outcome (OS) correlates with increasing PITX2 DNA methylation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S43-S44
Author(s):  
K.S. Harborg ◽  
R. Zachariae ◽  
J. Olsen ◽  
M. Johannsen ◽  
D. Cronin-Fenton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document