scholarly journals Law Review a Doctor's Certificate in the Judicial System of Indonesia on the Criminal Acts of Corruption

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 273-280
Author(s):  
Redyanto Sidi ◽  
Samuel Gunawan ◽  
Muhammad Yoga Dwi Anggara Sopiyan
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Law ◽  
Material Library

Phenomenon by providing a Doctor's certificate in the criminal justice system involving a witness, a suspect, accused in corruption cases start of the examination in the Police, the Prosecutor's office, Corruption Eradication Commission, the Court, as well as in Correctional Institutions, stating that the person concerned should be treated and treated specifically and also nothing should be referred to the hospital with complete amenities, this phenomenon has been carried out since long. The utilization of a doctor's certificate is against the law in criminal cases of corruption, according to the dynamics of law enforcement in Indonesia is certainly not going to stop. If this issue continues to be adversely affects the process of law enforcement in Indonesia. The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The source of the data obtained in this research is sourced from the material library and descriptive analytics which is intended to reveal a problem or situation or event as it is so that it can uncover the actual facts. The results in this study show that Fraud and irregularities a Doctor's certificate will easily occur. There is a strong tendency among law enforcement, that a doctor's certificate is evidence that the strong, and can not be contested. In the history of law enforcement corruption in Indonesia, law enforcement has yet to cultivate the examination and make a doctor's certificate is genuine or fake and can be justified scientifically and professionally. In addition, it is also never ask for another opinion from another doctor to check the health of a person declared sick and was unable to be present in the judicial process, from the previous doctor. Keywords: A Doctor's Certificate, Criminal Justice, Corruption.

scholarly journals ANAK NAKAL: DIVERSI DAN DILEMA PENERAPANNYA

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Eva Achjani Zulfa
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Management Policy ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Discourse Management

AbstrakHandling problems through brat children and children who have problems with the law have occurred again when some kids sticking a gamble being arrested at near Soekarno Hatta Airport areas then processed into the judicial process. Diversion is a form of change the process by which a program can only take place on hold pre-adjudication in the criminal justice system. Forms of transfer or diversion of this case are indeed associated with the authority possessed discretion of law enforcement officers. Giddiness has appeared in the process of implementation of diversion by law enforcement officials, the search for forms of application of the criminal case handlingchild has become a growing discourse management. Policy taken toward the institution of criminal diversion not only becomes demand for law enforcement officers, but also must be institutionalized through plain legal mechanisms. It becomes author's concern to create more certain procedures to brighten solve on deviant children in this way

DIVERSI CONCEPT IN COMPLETION OF CHILDREN'S CRIMINAL CASE

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-89
Author(s):  
Nisfawati Laili Jalilah
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Educational Institution ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
District Courts ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Judicial Process

Child protection is all activities to guarantee and protect children and their rights so that they can live, grow, develop, and participate optimally by human dignity and dignity, and get protection from violence and discrimination. Related to this, in resolving child criminal cases, the Criminal Justice Act (UUPPA) emphasizes that the concept of Restorative Justice or Diversity must be used, namely the transfer or transfer of the judicial process to an alternative process of settlement of the case, namely through deliberation or mediation. The purpose of diversion is to prevent children from detention, avoiding labeling children as criminals, preventing the repetition of criminal acts committed by children, so that children are responsible for their actions, carrying out interventions needed for victims and children without having to go through a formal process. Avoiding children from following the justice system process, and keep children from the negative influence and implications of the justice process.Implementation of application of diversion in the juvenile criminal justice system is carried out at the level of investigation, prosecution, and case examination in district courts. The diversion process is carried out through deliberation by involving children and their parents/guardians, social counselors, and professional social workers based on a restorative justice approach. The results of the Diversion agreement can take the form of, inter alia; peace with or without compensation, restitution in the event of a victim, medical and psychosocial rehabilitation, participation in education or training at an educational institution or LPKS no later than 3 (three) months; or community service for a maximum of 3 (three) months.

scholarly journals Women, violent crime and criminal justice in Georgian Wales

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATHERINE D. WATSON
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Sexual Assault ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Violent Crime ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Rape Victims ◽  
Quantitative Evidence ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Law

This article examines encounters of women with the criminal justice system in Wales during the century before the Courts of Great Sessions were abolished in 1830. Drawing on evidence from cases of sexual assault and homicide, it argues that women who killed were rarely convicted or punished harshly. A gendered discretion of sorts also acted against rape victims, as trials never resulted in conviction. Using violence as a lens, the paper reveals a distinctively Welsh approach to criminal justice, and offers quantitative evidence on which further comparative studies of the history of law and crime in England and Wales may be based.

scholarly journals PRIMUM REMEDIUM ACTION SANCTIONS AGAINST CHILDREN IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW

Cepalo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
Mashuril Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Law

Criminal sanctions are more popular than action sanctions at the application level. Action sanctions formulation is regulated in Articles 82 and 83 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, while criminal sanctions are the last resort. However, criminal sanctions are still the "prima donna" in law enforcement practices against children in conflict. This condition raises various problems such as the overcapacity of correctional institutions, burdens the state budget, and creates a stigma against children in conflict with the law. Because the purpose of implementing the juvenile criminal justice system is in the child's best interests, action sanctions should be prioritised, even though criminal sanctions are needed in law enforcement against children in conflict with the law. Therefore, an idea emerged to restore criminal sanctions as ultimum remedium and strengthen action sanctions as primum remedium. The problem discussed in this study is how to implement primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? And how to strengthen primum remedium action sanctions against children in conflict with the law? This study uses a normative juridical, an empirical juridical, and a comparative methods. The data in this article are sourced from primary and secondary data processed through description, prescription, and system. The results indicate that criminal sanctions still dominate judges' decisions in children in conflict with the law, and action sanctions are complementary sanctions because it is rarely applied.

The Corfu Criminal Court Archive: Recording, Impressing and Studying the Phenomenon of Violence and Justice in the Ionian State (1815-1864)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-65
Author(s):  
Yanna Dimitriou ◽  
◽  
Eleni Socratus ◽  
Emmanuil Drakakis
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Social Classes ◽  
Qualitative Evidence ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Law ◽  
First Time

This article examines the encounters of the Ionian people with criminal justice system during the period from 1815 to 1864, when the Ionian Islands were a British protectorate. Drawing on data from cases of the Criminal Court Archives of Corfu for the first time, it argues that criminality mostly concerned the lower social classes and was not very common. Using violence as a lens, the paper primarily focuses on Corfu’s criminal justice system and offers quantitative and qualitative evidence on which further comparative studies of the history of law and crime in Greece and Europe at that time may be based.

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 

scholarly journals Diversion In Children Criminal Justice System Through Restorative Justice

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Yudi Hendarto ◽  
Umar Ma'ruf
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Psychological Burden ◽  
Criminal Matters

The formulation of the problem and the purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the diversion urgency in handling juvenile criminal cases, and to describe and analyze Perma No. 4 of 2014 on Diversion in criminal matters menyelesaian children through restorative justice approach. This research method using normative legal research methods dengn type of research is descriptive analytical.� Based on the analysis result No. 4 of 2014 can be presented the following results, that Perma No. 4 of 2014 is needed in handling juvenile criminal cases. This is because during this time the condition of children who are in the coaching institutions, detention and permayarakatan far worse than a face appeared positive aspects of child development. Mixing children with adults in penitentiary have negative effects and its own psychological burden for the child, because he considered himself the same as adults with Perma No. 4 of 2014.Keywords: Diversion, Child Criminal Justice System, Restorative Justice

The Transportation of Scottish Criminals to America during the Eighteenth Century

1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Roger Ekirch
Keyword(s):  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Early Modern ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
The Public ◽  
American Colonies ◽  
History Of ◽  
Good Order

In the last few years there has been a growth of interest in the history of crime and law enforcement in early modern Scotland. Recent studies by Stephen Davies, Bruce Lenman, and Geoffrey Parker have described the intricate operation of the country's criminal justice system. Relatively little attention, however, has been paid to the role played by transportation. During the eighteenth century, banishing criminals to the American colonies became the most common punishment employed by higher courts. By providing a merciful alternative to the death penalty without putting the public at serious risk, transportation carried enormous appeal. An attorney in Edinburgh commented, “In many cases it is absolutely necessary for the safety of the state, and the good order of society, that the country should be rid of certain criminals.” This article seeks to explore the nature of Scottish transportation, from its growing popularity in the early 1700s to its demise in 1775, a result of the American Revolution. Questions basic to an understanding of this punishment and its operation remain unanswered. How often was it utilized by courts? How many offenders were exiled during the century? What sorts of crimes had they committed? By what means were they transported to America? How did Scottish procedure differ from the system employed in England? Answers to these questions, besides shedding new light on the internal mechanics of transportation, should open a valuable window onto the Scottish criminal justice system.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Oleh Hakim

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-300
Author(s):  
Sayid Andi Maulana ◽  
Dahlan Ali ◽  
Muhammad Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Research Community ◽  
Community Research ◽  
Research Report ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
Legal Consequences

Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Pasal 60 ayat (3) “Hakim wajib mempertimbangkan laporan penelitian kemasyarakatan dari Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan sebelum menjatuhkan putusan perkara”, ayat (4) “Dalam hal laporan penelitian kemasyarakatan sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (3) tidak dipertimbangkan dalam putusan Hakim, putusan batal demi hukum”. Namun hingga saat ini masih ditemukan putusan pengadilan yang sama sekali tidak mempertimbangkan laporan penelitian kemasyarakatan. Permasalahan yang perlu dikaji apakah sebab Hakim tidakmempertimbangkanLaporanPenelitianKemasyarakatan, dan bagaimanakah konsekuensihukumjikatidakdilaksanakannyaLaporanPenelitianKemasyarakatan.Tujuanpenulisanini untukmengetahuisebab Hakim tidakmempertimbangkanLaporanPenelitianKemasyarakatan dan untuk mengetahuikonsekuensihukumjikatidakdilaksanakannyaLaporanPenelitianKemasyarakatan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwadalammemutuskanperkaraanak yang berhadapandenganhukum,Hakim memilikialasanterhadaptidakmenguraikanlaporanpenelitiankemasyarakatanpadaputusan karena Hakim padaprinsipnyasudahmempertimbangkanlaporanpenelitiankemasyarakatan. Konsekuensihukumjika Hakim tidakmempertimbangkanLitmas yaitu anak masih tetap bisa ditahanuntuk proses peradilan yaitu perbaikan Putusan. Disarankan agar Hakim dapat mengulasisi materi dari Litmas dalam putusannya, termasukrekomendasi yang diberikanolehBapas.DisarankankepadaKementerianHukumdan HAM supayamemperhatikanketersediaantenagafungsionalBapassertapeningkatankompetensi agar menghasilkanLitmas yang semakinbaik sehingga jauh dari persepsi “copy paste”Law Number 11 Year 2012 on the Criminal Justice System of the Child, in Article 60 paragraph (3) "The judge is obliged to consider the reports of the research community from the community Supervisor before dropping the lawsuit verdict "paragraph (4) In terms of Community research reports as referred to in paragraph (3) are not considered in the judge's verdict, the verdict is annulled by law ". However up to now still found the Court ruling that simply does not consider research report. Problems that need to be examined whether because the judge did not consider Viable research report, and how do the legal consequences if it does not tackle in the research report. The purpose of this writing is to know because the judge did not consider the report of the Research Community and to know the legal consequences if it does not tackle in the research report. The research method used i.e. empirical juridical. Based on the results of the research it is known that in deciding a child dealing with matters of law, The judge has a reason against civic research report outlines not at ruling because Judges in principle had already been considering a research report. The legal consequences if the judge does not consider Litmas i.e. children still could be detained for judicial process, namely the improvement award. It is recommended that Judges can mengulasisi material from Litmas in an award, including the recommendations given by Bapas. It is recommended to the Ministry of Justice and human rights in order that notice of the availability of functional competency enhancement as well as Bapas in order to produce better Litmas so far from the perception of "copy paste".

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tugas dan Kewenangan Jaksa sebagai Penyidik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Vani Kurnia ◽  
Sahuri Lasmadi ◽  
Elizabeth Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Future

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana tugas dan kewenangan jaksa sebagai penyidik dalam tindak pidana korupsi dan menganalisis bagaimana tugas dan kewenangan jaksa sebagai penyidik dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di masa yang akan datang. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah 1)Bahwa dari segi yuridis, jaksa memiliki wewenang dalam melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi, namun kewenangan masing-masing sub sistem dalam sistem peradilan pidana tindak pidana korupsi harus diperjelas karena sangat menentukan sekali agar kepastian hukum dan kesebandingan hukum dapat tercapai. 2)Bahwa kewenangan penyidikan tindak pidana korupsi yang dimiliki oleh jaksa saat ini berbenturan dengan sistem peradilan pidana yang berlaku di Indonesia. Jika kewenangan penyidikan oleh kejaksaan masih dipertahankan maka terkesan tidak adanya koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum karena hampir dalam setiap tahapan penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi yaitu tahap penyelidikan, penyidikan, penuntutan dan pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan atau eksekusi, dimiliki oleh lembaga kejaksaan. ABSTRACT This article aims to find out and analyze how the duties and powers of prosecutors as investigators in criminal acts of corruption and analyze the duties and powers of prosecutors as investigators in corruption in the future. The research method used is normative juridical. The results are 1) Whereas from a juridical perspective, the prosecutor has the authority to carry out investigations into criminal acts of corruption, however, the authority of each sub-system in the criminal justice system for corruption must be clarified because it is very decisive so that legal certainty and legal equivalence can be achieved. 2) Whereas the prosecutor's current authority to investigate criminal acts of corruption clashes with the criminal justice system in force in Indonesia. If the investigative authority is maintained by the prosecutor's office, it seems that there is no coordination between law enforcement agencies because almost every stage of law enforcement on corruption, namely the investigation, investigation, prosecution and implementation of court decisions or executions, is owned by the prosecutor's office.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document