scholarly journals Laparoscopic CBD Exploration (LCBDE) a better and safe option for large CBD stones

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1321-1323
Author(s):  
I. Sadiq ◽  
A. Malik ◽  
J. K. Lodhi ◽  
S. T. Bukhari ◽  
R. Maqbool ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Conventionally, common bile duct stones (CBDS) are removed with help of ERCP. However, if CBDS are larger than 10 mm, then the ERCP failure rate to retrieve CBDS becomes high. In that case, open or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is other alternative. In this era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) seems to be a better option than open approach, but in our set up the safety of LCBDE is questioned. Aim: To see the conversion rate as well as complications associated with LCBDE. Material & Methods: Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) for large CBD stones at Fatima Memorial Hospital Lahore. Results: Since 2012, 29 patients of large (≥10 mm) CBD stones were included in this study. Among them 20(69.9%) were females and 9(31.01%) were males. The mean CBD stone size was 13 mm. Stones were extracted transcystically in 4 case and Transcholedochal stone extraction was done in 25 cases. The average duration of surgery was 130 minutes, but all cases were completed successfully without converting to open approach. There was minor bile leak in 3 patients which was managed successfully without any further intervention. No other complication was observed with LCBDE and even no retained stone was reported. Conclusion: Laparoscopic CBD exploration is safe and effective method of dealing CBD stones especially of large size when the chances of ERCP failure to retrieve stones are high. Keywords: Laparoscopy, ERCP, common bile duct,

scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Binit Prasad ◽  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Cbd Stone ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Introduction: Common Bile Duct stones (CBD) are found in approximately 16% of the patients undergoing Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Till recently, the gold standard for treating CBD stones was endoscopic removal, if that failed, then open surgery. However, in the laparoscopic era, the best treatment for CBD stones is a matter of debate and it continues to evolve. The objective of the present study is to determine that laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a safe, feasible and single-stage option for the management of CBD stones. Materials and Methods :Out of the 2900 laparoscopic cholecystectomies we did selective intraoperative cholangiogram in 262 patients who were suspected to have CBD stones based on deranged liver function tests, dilated CBD with or without CBD stone on sonography or having the history of recent jaundice/pancreatitis. If CBD stone was found, either a transcystic or transcholedochal exploration was done depending on the size, site, number of stones and CBD diameter. Choledochotomy was closed over a t-tube in the majority of the patients. Primary closure of CBD was done in few patients and in one patient we placed an antegrade stent and in another we placed endoscopic stent into the CBD laparoscpically which was removed after four weeks. Results :Till date we have performed LCBDE in 64 patients. Transcystic exploration was done in 14 patients and transcholedochal exploration was done in 46 cases out of which 2 patients had minor biliary leak which settled on conservative treatment in 2-3 days. Four patients required conversion to open surgery as there were multiple stones. We did not have any major complication and on 6 months follow-up in 76% patients, none was found to have residual stone. Conclusion :The treatment of CBD stones depends on the resources available, technical limitations and the surgeon’s expertise. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is a safe, feasible and single-stage option for the management of CBD stones.

scholarly journals Novel Method for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Performed Using a Disposable Bronchoscope (Ambu® aScope TM)

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Yousif Mahmood Aawsaj ◽  
Ibrahim K Ibrahim ◽  
Andrew Gilliam
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Capital Outlay ◽  
Case Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration can be performed following choledocotomy or via the trancystic approach. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is limited in some benign upper gastrointestinal units due to the cost of sterilization of the re-usable choledochoscope. We have recently published a case series confirming the safety and efficacy of the 5mm re-usable bronchoscope for CBD exploration. This case series evaluates a single-use bronchochoscope (Ambu aScopeTM) for laparoscopic CBD exploration. Data were collected from electronic records of the patients from January 2015 until December 2016; all the cases had confirmation of CBD stones. Twenty-one patients had CBD exploration using the disposable bronchochoscope. There were 7 male and 14 female (median age 42). 8 procedures were performed as emergencies and 13 were performed electively. All the cases were done laparoscopically apart from one planned as an open procedure due to previous extensive open surgery. Twenty cases had their CBD cleared using disposable bronchoscope and one needed subsequent special test follow up. Choledocotomy was performed in 15 and Tran’s cystic approach was performed in 6. No T-tube was used in the laparoscopic cases. 2 cases were performed as day case surgery. Median postoperative hospital stay was 2.5 days. In conclusion, the disposable bronchoscope is safe and effective for use in CBD exploration with results comparable to our previously published case series. It has guaranteed sterility and is cost effective compared to the re-usable bronchoscope especially when initial capital outlay, sterile processing and maintenance costs are considered.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Retrieval of Impacted Dormia Basket following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with Mechanical Failure: Case Report with Literature Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. O’Brien ◽  
R. Tyler ◽  
S. Shaukat ◽  
A. M. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Fogarty Catheter ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Laparoscopic Case ◽  
The Common ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Dormia baskets are commonly used during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). One complication is basket retention, through impaction with a gallstone or wire fracture. We describe a case where the external handle of the basket snapped causing retained basket plus large gallstone impacted in the common bile duct (CBD). Following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration allowed direct stone fragmentation under vision with the choledochoscope. Fragments were removed using a choledochoscopic basket and Fogarty catheter, and the basket was withdrawn. Literature search identified 114 cases of retained baskets with management including shockwave lithotripsy (27%), papillary balloon dilatation (22%), open CBD exploration (11%), and one laparoscopic case.

scholarly journals Various Techniques for the Surgical Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta Review

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Shojaiefard ◽  
Majid Esmaeilzadeh ◽  
Ali Ghafouri ◽  
Arianeb Mehrabi
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Biliary Sphincterotomy ◽  
Meta Review ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Common bile duct stones (CBDSs) may occur in up to 3%–14.7% of all patients for whom cholecystectomy is preformed. Patients presenting with CBDS have symptoms including: biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or may be asymptomatic. It is important to distinguish between primary and secondary stones, because the treatment approach varies. Stones found before, during, and after cholecystectomy had also differing treatments. Different methods have been used for the treatment of CBDS but the suitable therapy depends on conditions such as patient' satisfaction, number and size of stones, and the surgeons experience in laparoscopy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration (transcystic or transcholedochal), or laparotomy with CBD exploration (by T-tube, C-tube insertion, or primary closure) are the most commonly used methods managing CBDS. We will review the pathophysiology of CBDS, diagnosis, and different techniques of treatment with especial focus on the various surgical modalities.

scholarly journals O-EGS03 Laparoscopic surgery versus Endoscopy in the management Common Bile Duct Stones: systematic review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hafs Elhag ◽  
Omar Eltayeb
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acute Cholangitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Cbd Stones

Abstract Background With the advancement in minimally invasive surgery, a 1 stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) is a great alternative to removing the gallbladder and CBD stones provided the surgeon possesses the necessary skills. The current guidelines for managing CBD stones is the 2 stage approach, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by (LC). The objective of this study is to assess whether LCBDE+LC should be the gold standard in managing CBD stones by comparing the clearance rate of common bile duct stones, morbidity, mortality, and the duration of hospital stay with ERCP+LC. Methods This is a systematic review with a meta-analysis that included RCTs of patients who were treated by the LCBDE/LC versus ERCP+LC. The PRISMA guidelines for reporting systemic reviews were followed. RCTs were collected by 2 authors Independently from Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline and Embase. Statistical analysis was carried out by a computer application called Review Manager using the Mantel–Haenszel method, the results were then plotted on a Forest Plot diagram and the 2 groups were then compared. Results 849 patients from 7 RCTs were included in the study, 426 patients in the ERCP+LC arm and 423 in the LCBDE/LC arm. According to the Meta-analysis, Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Cholecystectomy was significantly superior to ERCP + LC in terms of successful Clearance of CBD stone, mortality rate, and Acute Pancreatitis. but had significantly higher rates in biliary leakages. There were no significant differences in Surgical Site Infections, Haemorrhages, Acute Cholangitis, Perforations, or duration of hospital stay between the two arms. Conclusions The current evidence suggests that LCBDE/LC is superior in successful CBD stone clearance, mortality, and acute pancreatitis. However, further RCTs will be needed to assess overall Morbidity, surgical site infections, Haemorrhages, Acute Cholangitis, perforations, or duration of hospital stay. The current guidelines must be reviewed to consider LCBDE/LC as the gold standard in managing patients with CBD stones.

EP.TH.754One Year Experience of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in a District General Hospital Using Ambu Disposable Scope

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alsarah Diab ◽  
Jane Kilkenny ◽  
Omer Eltayeb
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Emergency Setting ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Abstract Aim Common bile duct (CBD) stones are the most common cause of obstructive jaundice. Laparoscopic exploration of the CBD with laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been preferred to endoscopic treatment, as a single-stage modality of treatment for CBD stones. This procedure was started in a District General Hospital in May 2019 using the standard port sites and Ambu® aScope™ 2 single-use flexible scope. Methods Retrospective analysis of outcome of all laparoscopic CBD explorations done in a District General Hospital between May 2019 and September 2020. Results A total of ten laparoscopic CBD explorations were carried out during the identified period, the main indications were young patients (40%), referral by gastroenterologist (40%) and failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (20%). The mean age (±SD) was 54.7 (± 19.2) and 70% of patients were females. Two thirds of the operations were done in emergency setting, with choledochotomy approach being used in 60% of cases and primary closure in all cases. The average length of stay (±SD) after the operation was 3.1 (±1.9). Only one patient developed a haemoserous collection that required a laparoscopic washout, none of the patients required readmission. Conclusion Laparoscopic CBD exploration can be performed safely in a district general hospital, the disposable Ambu® aScope™ 2 is safe, feasible and cost-effective substitute to the reusable choledochoscope. Provision of this laparoscopic CBD exploration at district general hospital level is more convenient to patients and can reduce referrals to regional hepatobiliary units, and therefore provide a good training opportunity for surgical registrars in this setting.

scholarly journals Evaluation of different methods of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 2670
Author(s):  
Elghamry E. Elghamry ◽  
Mohamed M. Elsheikh ◽  
Hamdy A. Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Biliary Colic ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Common bile duct (CBD) stones are the second most common complication of gall bladder stones. The best management of patients with CBD stones remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methods of laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE).Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with CBD stones through 2 years. CBD stricture was excluded. Authors used transcystic and transcholedochotomy approaches for LCBDE either with or without choledoschope. Primary repair of the choledochotomy incision was done. Results: The mean age was 48.90±11.84 years. Biliary colic was the presentation in 63.3% of patients. The transcystic approach for CBD exploration was used in 16 cases without conversion, 11 cases were completed without choledochoscope, while 5 cases with choledochoscopic guided extraction. Choledochotomy approach had been used in 13 cases, 6 cases were completed with choledochoscope and 7 cases without it, two cases of them failed. One case failed from the beginning and was converted to open exploration. 5 ERCP previously inserted stents were removed. The mean operative time was 162.33±74.67 min. Bile leakage occurred in 2 cases following the choledochotomy approach. The mean hospital stay was 3.37±1.38 days.Conclusion: LCBDE is a feasible, effective and safe approach to bile duct stones. Depending on proper training and gaining experience. 

scholarly journals Surgical procedure for unexpected balloon burst complication during endoscopic balloon dilatation in a patient with common bile duct stones

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Morishita ◽  
Hideaki Sasaki
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Balloon

Abstract Background Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is the established treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. Although pancreatitis and bleeding have been reported as major complications of EBD, balloon-related complications are rarely reported in EBD. Case presentation A 30-year-old woman with suspected CBD stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EBD. During EBD, the balloon of the EBD catheter suddenly burst at the biliary sphincter. We therefore performed surgical intervention: removal of the broken EBD catheter and T-tube drainage. Finally, the patient was discharged without any complications. Conclusions We present a case involving a burst balloon of an EBD catheter as a rare complication during EBD, as well as the surgical technique that was used to treat this complication.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Findings in the Diagnosis of Biliary System Stones

2022 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 841-852
Author(s):  
Abdullah Taher Naji ◽  
Ameen Mohsen Amer ◽  
Saddam Mohammed Alzofi ◽  
Esmail Abdu Ali ◽  
Noman Qaid Alnaggar
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Biliary System ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
System Diagnosis ◽  
Us Findings

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and Ultrasound (US) images for the diagnosis of biliary system stones, as well as to assess the consistency between MRCP and US findings. The study sample included 200 cases (90 males and 110 females) with symptomatic biliary system stones between 14 and 82 years. All cases underwent both the US and MRCP imaging for biliary system diagnosis. The study revealed that the most prominent age group with symptoms of biliary system stones was the 33-60-year-old group. It also found that the accuracy of US and MRCP in detecting gallbladder (GB) stones compared with the final diagnosis was 94% and 91%, respectively, with moderate conformity between their results. The accuracy of US and MRCP images in detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones was 61% and 98%, respectively, with fair conformity between their results. In addition, there is a significant agreement between the MRCP and US results in detecting the GB and CBD stones with an agreed percentage of 74% and 71%, respectively. The study concluded that US is the preferred imaging technique for patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, whereas MRCP is a trustworthy investigation for common bile duct stones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document