THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EURASIAN UNION IN THE CONTEXT OF CITIZENSHIP. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES

2018 ◽  
Vol VIII (z. 2) ◽  
pp. 45-59
Author(s):  
Stefan Marek Grochalski ◽  
Paweł Jakub Szewczyk

The formulation of the topic generally includes three elements, which are: the European Union (EU), the Eurasian Economic Union (EAUG) and citizenship. Thus, we deal first with a collision, a juxtaposition, two different, albeit somewhat similar, secondary subjects of international law, which remain the organizations mentioned in the subject. Second, with the institution of citizenship in the context of these two organizations. The issues raised above and below can and can have a series of question marks or even controversies. Citizens' relations - citizenship in the case of these organizations are shaped differently, although, importantly, they are not only abstract. In many situations they have theirs, starting from legal and ending with a practical dimension.

Federalism ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 143-160
Author(s):  
M. V. Gligich-Zolotareva

While the European Union is undergoing processes of disintegration like the UK’s withdrawal from its membership, the possible collapse of the UK, budget problems, subsidies decrease, territorial and financial disputes and claims – Eurasian integration is slowly and steadily raising. The principle of “communicating vessels” in the course of integration on the continent works largely due to the fact that the European Union and the Eurasian economic Union are single-order system entities with a similar history. Currently, due to the lack of integration in Europe, the EEU has begun to develop intensively. A Large Eurasian partnership is being formed. It is a network of bilateral and multilateral trade agreements with different depth, speed and level of interaction, with market openness depending on the readiness of a particular national economy to work together. Among the BEP’s principles are voluntary, mutually beneficial, equal rights, transparency, and strict compliance with international law and obligations. Despite of a number of issues, such as strengthening of the opposing Eurasian integration trends, the institutional weakness of supranational bodies, lack of development of a regional segment of the Eurasian integration, the Eurasian Union is the path which allow its members to take a worthy place in the complex world of the XXI century.


2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 102-111
Author(s):  
Igor V. Pilipenko ◽  

This article considers how to enhance the institutional structure of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in order to enable timely decision-making and implementation of governance decisions in the interests of Eurasian integration deepening. We compare the governance structures of the EAEU and the European Union (EU) using the author’s technique and through the lens of theories of neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism elaborated with respect to the EU. We propose to determine a major driver of the integration process at this stage (the College of the Eurasian Economic Commission or the EAEU member states), to reduce the number of decision-making bodies within the current institutional structure of the EAEU, and to divide clearly authority and competence of remaining bodies to exclude legal controversies in the EAEU.


2021 ◽  
pp. 570-573
Author(s):  
M.A. Polozhishnikova ◽  
E.Yu. Raikova

The article defines the features of higher education in the Eurasian Economic Union and the prospects for cooperation with the European Union in the field of training personnel capable of solving the problems of eliminating technical barriers in the implementation of foreign economic activity and identifies the main integration processes in the higher education system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-91
Author(s):  
L. S. Voronkov

The paper is dedicated to the differences between the classical instruments for regulating interstate political and trade-economic relations from those used in the development of regional integration processes. Traditionally, the Eurasian Economic Union is compared with the European Union, considering the EU as a close example to follow in the development of integration processes. At the same time, there exist the other models of integration. The author proposes to pay attention to the other models of integration and based on the analysis of documents, reveals the experience of Northern Europe, which demonstrates effective cooperation without infringing on the sovereignty of the participants. The author examines the features of the integration experience of the Nordic countries in relation to the possibility of using its elements in the modern integration practice of the Eurasian Economic Union.


World Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3(43)) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Идрышева Сара Кимадиевна

The article is devoted to the consideration of the main program documents on the establishment of the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union, as well as its predecessors in terms of identifying the participants in these integration associations about the purpose of creating interstate unions. Based on the application of logical, historical methods of scientific research and comparative legal analysis of the texts of constituent documents of two subjects of international law, the author comes to the conclusion that there is such a lack of constituent documents of the Eurasian Economic Union as the lack of emphasis on ensuring well-being for each person living in the union states. The author believes that the prevalence in the constituent documents of the EAEU goals of achieving economic success entails an appropriate attitude to the degree of protection of human rights in this union.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 0-0 ◽  
Author(s):  
Анатолий Капустин ◽  
Anatoliy Kapustin

The article discusses the main features of the Law of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) from the point of view of modern international law, its legal nature and place, and functions in the regulation of the Eurasian integration. The article investigates the importance of the Foundation agreement as the international legal basis of the Union and its legal system. The author conducts comparative law analysis of conceptual models of the integration law on the example of the European legal theories of the European Union and Latin American theories of law on regional economic integration. This article gives comprehensive international law characteristics of regulatory definitions and conceptual framework of the EAEU law. The author classifies contractual sources of the Union’s Law and reveals the relationship between them. The author shows the role of secondary sources of the Union’s Law — acts of intergovernmental bodies. The author does not only list the sources enumerated in the EAEU Treaty, but also makes a forecast about the role of other international law acts and norms in the development of the EAEU Law concept. The author draws the conclusion that the Union’s Law is of an international law nature.


2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 911-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Frimpong Oppong

Private international law deals with problems that arise when transactions or claims involve a foreign element. Such problems are most frequent in a setting that allows for the growth of international relationships, be they commercial or personal. Economic integration provides such a setting and allows for the free movement of persons, goods, services and capital across national boundaries. The facilitation of factor mobility resulting from economic integration and the concomitant growth in international relationships results in problems which call for resolution using the tools of private international law. An economic community cannot function solely on the basis of economic rules; attention must also be paid to the rules for settling cross-border disputes. Consequently, considerable attention is given to the subject within the European Union (EU)1 and other economic communities.2


2020 ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
Mikhail Nosov ◽  

At present time, there are three main international integration projects actually operating in the Eurasian space ‒ the European Union (EU), the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Chinese “Belt & Road Initiative” (BRI) project. All three differ in the time of their beginning, in economic and political possibilities, in methods of implementation and in its goals. All projects, one way or another, interact with each other in Eurasia with different intensity, potentially open up wide opportunities for them, but also create new problems. For Russia relations with China is one of the most important factors of its foreign policy and the Chinese project is a substantial part of it. The article examines the history of the Chinese project, the reasons for its occurrence, and the problems arising in bilateral and global relations in the context of Russia’s participation in it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document