Biosimilars in Saudi Arabia: a single-centre, open-label case series examining infliximab switching

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-71
Author(s):  
Mansour Somaily ◽  
Hana Alahmari ◽  
Wejdan Abbag ◽  
Shahenda Yousif ◽  
Nawar Tayfour ◽  
...  

Background: A biosimilar version of infliximab ( CT-P13) was recently approved for use in Saudi Arabia. Clinical data support its use in the treatment of rheumatic disease, however, there is a lack of local data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of CT-P13 among patients with rheumatological disorders in Saudi Arabia. Objectives: To investigate the feasibility, tolerability and immunogenicity of switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab, CT-P13, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and Behçet’s disease (BD). Methodology: The study included patients who were being treated with originator infliximab in the Department of Rheumatology in Khamis Mushayt General Hospital, Saudi Arabia, and were required to switch to biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) between January 2018 and June 2019. Patient follow-up was carried out every three months for one year. The disease activity score 28 (DAS28) was used to assess RA severity. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score was used to measure disease activity in patients with AS, while BD disease activity was based on clinical assessment. Results: In total, 13 patients (six with RA, five with AS and two with BD) were switched to biosimilar infliximab. The majority (n = 11/13) remained on biosimilar infliximab throughout the follow-up period with no reported major adverse events. Overall, there was a significant improvement in RA disease activity following biosimilar treatment, with the mean DAS28 decreasing from 3.61±1.24 before biosimilar therapy to 2.63±1.54 one year after switching. Conclusion: In patients with AS, BD, or RA who switched from originator infliximab to the biosimilar, CT-P13, we did not observe any significant differences in tolerability or efficacy between biosimilar and originator. Furthermore, disease activity significantly declined in RA patients following biosimilar treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaltsonoudis Evripidis ◽  
Pelechas Eleftherios ◽  
Voulgari V. Paraskevi ◽  
Drosos A. Alexandros

Background: Switching from reference infliximab (RI) to biosimilar infliximab (BI) had no detrimental effects on efficacy and safety. However, long-term follow-up data is missing. Objective: To evaluate patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in clinical remission who were switching from RI to BI, in terms of the safety and efficacy of this, in a long-term fashion. Methods: One hundred and nine consecutive unselected AS patients were investigated. All were naïve to other biologics and were followed-up at predefined times receiving RI. Patients in clinical remission were asked to switch from RI to BI. Those who switched to BI were compared with a matched control-group receiving continuous RI. During follow-up, several parameters were recorded for at least 18 months. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), and the Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS), using the C-reactive protein. Remission was defined as BASDAI < 4 and ASDAS < 1.3. Results: Eighty-eight patients were evaluated (21 excluded for different reasons). From those, 45 switched to BI, while 43 continued receiving RI. No differences between groups regarding demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were observed. All patients were in clinical remission. During follow-up, five patients from the BI-group and three from the maintenance-group discontinued the study (4 patients nocebo effect, 1 loss of efficacy). After 18 months of treatment, all patients in both groups remained in clinical remission. No significant adverse events were noted between groups. Conclusion: BI is equivalent to RI in maintaining AS in clinical remission for at least 18 months.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1129.1-1129
Author(s):  
A. Baillet ◽  
X. Romand ◽  
A. Pfimlin ◽  
M. Dalecky ◽  
M. Dougados

Background:Standardization of clinical practice has been proven to be effective in management of chronic diseases. This is particularly true at the time where the concept of treat to target is becoming more and more important in the field of axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA).Objectives:To propose a list of variables to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and over the follow-up of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) for an optimal management in daily practice.Methods:The process comprised (1) the evaluation of the interest of 51 variables proposed for the assessment of axSpA via a systematic literature research, (2) a consensus process involving 78 hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists, considering the collection of the variable in a 4 grade scale from ”potentially useful” to “mandatory”, (3) a consensus on optimal timeline for periodic assessment of the selected variables on a 5 grade scale from “at each visit” to “never to be re-collected”.Results:The systematic literature research retrieved a total of 14,133 abstracts, of which 213 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Concerning the data to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up, we proposed to differentiate the results based on a) the way of collection of the variables (e.g. questionnaires by the patient, interview by the physician, physical examination, investigations) b) the usefulness these variables in daily practice based on the opinion of the rheumatologists ” c) the optimal timeline between 2 evaluations of the variable based on the opinion of the rheumatologists. In the initial systematic review, symptoms of heart failure history of inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis or uveitis, patient global visual analogic scale, spine radiographs, modified Schöber test, coxo-femoral rotations, swollen joint count, urine strip test, BASDAI and ASDAS global scores were considered very useful and nocturnal back pain/morning stiffness, sacro-iliac joints radiographs and CRP were considered mandatory (Figure 1). Timeline between 2 evaluations of variables to collect in the periodic review are summarized inFigure 2.Figure 1.Core sets of items to collect and report in the systematic review in axial spondyloarthritis management in daily practice ASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functionnal Index, BASMI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, CT=computerized tomography, FIRST=Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool, HLA=Human Leukocyte Antigen, MRI=Magnetic resonance imaging, PET=positron emission tomography.Figure 2.Periodic review timeline of variables to collectASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, IBD = inflammatory bowel diseases, PRO = Patient Reported OutcomesConclusion:Using an evidence-based and an expert consensus approaches, this initiative defined a core set of variables to be collected and reported at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with ax-SpA in daily practice.Acknowledgments:this study has been conducted in two parts: the first one (evidence-based) was conducted thanks to a support from Abbvie France. AbbVie did not review the content or have influence on this manuscript. The second part of this initiative (consensus) has been conducted thanks to a support from the scientific non-profit organization: Association de Recherche Clinique en RhumatologieDisclosure of Interests:Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, Xavier Romand Consultant of: Xavier ROMAND has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Arnaud Pfimlin Consultant of: Arnaud PFIMLIN has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Mickael Dalecky Consultant of: Mickael DALECKY has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Maxime Dougados Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma


Author(s):  
Pedro Ricardo Kömel Pimenta ◽  
Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da Silva ◽  
Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro dos Santos ◽  
Adriana Maria Kakehasi ◽  
Francisco de Assis Acurcio ◽  
...  

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-TNF drugs for ankylosing spondylitis. Materials & methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at a pharmacy in the Brazilian Public Health System. Effectiveness by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, functionality by Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, quality of life by European Quality of Life Five-Dimensions and safety was assessed at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Results: About 160 patients started the treatment with adalimumab, etanercept or infliximab. There was a statistically significant improvement in disease activity, functionality and quality of life at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This real-world study has shown that anti-TNF drugs are effective and well tolerated for ankylosing spondylitis patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 2142-2148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Poddubnyy ◽  
Aleksandra Fedorova ◽  
Joachim Listing ◽  
Hildrun Haibel ◽  
Xenofon Baraliakos ◽  
...  

Objective.The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of radiographic spinal progression and disease activity on function and spinal mobility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors for up to 10 years.Methods.Patients with AS who participated in 2 longterm open-label extensions of clinical trials with TNF-α inhibitors (43 receiving infliximab and 17 receiving etanercept) were included in this analysis based on the availability of spinal radiographs performed at baseline and at a later timepoint (yr 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10) during followup. Spinal radiographs were scored according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Function was assessed by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), spinal mobility by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), and disease activity by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).Results.After the initial improvement, BASFI and BASMI remained remarkably stable at low levels over up to 10 years despite radiographic spinal progression. In the generalized mixed effects model analysis, no association between the mSASSS and the BASFI change (β = 0.0, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.03) was found, while there was some effect of mSASSS changes on BASMI changes over time (β = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01–0.09). BASDAI showed a strong association with function (β = 0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.73) and to a lesser extent, with spinal mobility (β = 0.14, 95% CI 0.01–0.26).Conclusion.Functional status and spinal mobility of patients with established AS remained stable during longterm anti-TNF-α therapy despite radiographic progression. This indicates that reduction and continuous control of inflammation might be able to outweigh the functional effect of structural damage progression in AS.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 700-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Sieper ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Maxime Dougados ◽  
L Steve Brown ◽  
Frederic Lavie ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo describe the efficacy and safety through 5 years of adalimumab treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and to identify predictors of remission.MethodsPatients with active AS were followed up to 5 years during a 24-week randomised, controlled period, followed by an open-label extension. Disease activity and clinical improvement were evaluated by Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) responses, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). Kaplan–Meier was used to identify patients with sustained ASAS partial remission (PR) or ASDAS inactive disease (ID) for three or more consecutive visits spanning ≥6 months. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with remission. Explanatory variables included baseline demographic and disease characteristics and week 12 responses.ResultsOf the 311 patients who received at least one dose of adalimumab, 202 (65%) completed the 5-year study. Among 125 patients who received 5 years of adalimumab, 70%, 77%, 51% and 61% achieved ASAS40, BASDAI 50, ASAS PR and ASDAS ID, respectively. Of 311 adalimumab-treated patients, 45% and 55% achieved sustained ASAS PR and ASDAS ID at any time during study participation. The strongest predictor of remission at years 1 and 5 and of sustained remission was achieving remission at 12 weeks of treatment; baseline characteristics showed weaker associations. Adverse events were comparable with previous reports on adalimumab safety.ConclusionsIn patients with active AS, the efficacy and safety of adalimumab were maintained through 5 years with about half of the patients experiencing sustained remission at any time during the study. Early achievement of remission was the best predictor of long-term and sustained remission.


Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1340-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Feld ◽  
Justine Yang Ye ◽  
Vinod Chandran ◽  
Robert D Inman ◽  
Nigil Haroon ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to compare patients with ankylosing spondylitis with psoriasis (ASP) and without psoriasis (AS), to axial PsA (axPsA) patients. Methods Two adult cohorts were recruited from the AS clinic: ASP and AS. These two cohorts were compared with two adult cohorts recruited from the PsA clinic: axPsA (radiographic sacroiliitis: ⩾bilateral grade 2 or unilateral grade 3 or 4); and Peripheral PsA. All patients were followed prospectively according to the same protocol. The demographic, clinical and radiographic variables were compared. Adjusted means were used to account for varying intervals between visits. A logistic regression was performed and adjusted for follow-up duration. Results There were 477 axPsA patients, 826 peripheral PsA, 675 AS and 91 ASP patients included. AS patients were younger (P &lt; 0.001), more male and HLA-B*27 positive (76%, 72% vs 64%, P ⩽ 0.001, 82%, 75%, vs 19%, P = 0.001). They had more back pain at presentation (90%, 92% vs 19%, P = 0.001), worse axial disease activity scores (bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index: 4.1, 3.9 vs 3.5 P = 0.017), worse back metrology (bath ankylosing spondylitis metrology index: 2.9, 2.2 vs 1.8, P &lt; 0.001), worse physician global assessments (2.4, 2.2 vs 2.1, P &lt; 0.001), were treated more with biologics (29%, 21% vs 7%, P = 0.001) and had a higher grade of sacroiliitis (90%, 84% vs 51%, P &lt; 0.001). Similar differences were detected in the comparison of ASP to axPsA and in a regression model. Conclusion AS patients, with or without psoriasis, seem to be different demographically, genetically, clinically and radiographically from axPsA patients. axPsA seems to be a distinct entity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1438.2-1438
Author(s):  
V. Boyadzhieva ◽  
N. Stoilov ◽  
E. Kurteva ◽  
R. Stoilov

Background:Assessment of disease activity and quality of life are one of the main indicators for determining the effectiveness of treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. In recent years, a new group has entered the market - target synthetic DMARDS, which prove their effectiveness in treating RA comparable to that of biological products.Objectives:The aim of this study is to evaluate the disease activity and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with biological agents in comparison with Tofacitinib (real life data from Bulgarian population) and determine whether or not the benefits of different therapies were sustained over a follow up period of 1 year.Methods:164 patients were selected with a mean age 55.34 ± 16SD years, meeting the 1987 ACR and /or ACR/ EULAR (2010) classification criteria for Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients were arranged according to treatment regimens: Tocilizumab (TCL) 30 patients, Certolizumab (CZP) 16, Golimumab (GOL) 22, Etanercept (ETN) 20, Adalimumab (ADA) 20, Rituximab (RTX) 16, Infliximab (INF) 20, Tofacitinib (TOF) 20. Disease activity and quality of life was the primary concern. Independent joint assessor evaluated 28 joints on baseline, 6th and 12th month’s thereafter. CRP was used to measure the inflammatory process.DAS28-CRP, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simplified disease activity index (SDAI)were calculated. On baseline all of the patients’ groups had severe disease activity (mean DAS28-CRP > 5.2, mean CDAI > 22, mean SDAI > 26. The quality of life was evaluated via EQ-5D.All of the patients were on stable therapy according to the inclusion criteria, and didn’t interrupt any of the medications including biological or target synthetic treatment.Results:Significant clinical improvement and statistically significant reduction in disease activity were observed in patients treated with bDMARDS and tsDMARDS within 6 months (p <0.005) of treatment and after 12 months of follow-up (p=0.039). The mean value of DAS28-CRP after one year follow up showed an non-inferior effect of Tofacitnib (3.04± 0.81) in comparison to biological treatment (TCL: 3.07 ± 0.73; CZP: 3.06 ± 0.65; GOL: 2.49 ± 0.76; ETN: 2.85 ± 0.55; ADA: 3.15 ± 0.82; RTX: 2.90 ± 0.70; INF: 3.14; ± 0.61; TOF: 3.04± 0.81). An improvement was also observed for the 6 to 12 months of follow-up as we did not detect a significant difference in the activity of the disease assessed by CDAI among the different drug groups.The mean values showing the change of the SDAI over the study period also outline comparable profiles. All of the treatment groups achieved a rapid reduction in disease activity that continued to decrease through the 6 and 12 months period, respectively, as supported by changes in SDAI.The quality of life evaluated with EQ-5D revealed significant improvement on the 6-th month of follow up as well as after 12th month (p<0.005) without significant difference between the observed groups.Conclusion:Real-life data show that patients on biological treatment as well as those on Tofacitinib therapy achieve a significant decrease in disease activity after one year of follow-up. This gives us reason to accept the importance of non-inferior effect of jak-inhibitors and their place in treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis.Disclosure of Interests:Vladimira Boyadzhieva: None declared, Nikolay Stoilov: None declared, Ekaterina Kurteva: None declared, Rumen Stoilov Grant/research support from: R-Pharm


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1148.2-1148
Author(s):  
T. El Joumani ◽  
T. Latifa ◽  
I. Hmamouchi ◽  
S. Ahid ◽  
R. Abouqal ◽  
...  

Objectives:The aims of our study are to determine the new comorbidities appearing under biologic therapy, their prevalence, and the factors implicated in their appearance.Methods:It’s a multicentric historical-prospective cohort including 10 rheumatology departments of Moroccan University Hospitals. The data were collected from the national register of patients under biologic therapy supervised by the Moroccan Society of Rheumatology. An electronic follow-up questionnaire is completed every 6 months by the investigator.Results:The study included 418 patients: 224 with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) who represented 53.6% and 194 with spondyloarthropathy (SP) who represented 46.4%.The prevalence rate of comorbidities appearing after one year of treatment with biologic therapy was 15.7% in RA and 8.4% in SP. The rate of cardiovascular diseases was 12.9% (arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction and/or ischemic stroke), 6.4% was the same value of hypercholesterolemia and depression, diabetes 3.3%, ulcer 3.2%, and osteoporosis 9.7%. The sedentary rate was 54.8% and smoking was about 3.3%.No patient had developed hypertriglyceridemia or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.In the group of patients with RA, the average age of the patients who had developed a new comorbidity was 51,8 ± 11,3 years, women represented 87.5%, the average of Body Mass Index (BMI) was 27,6 ± 5,9 and the average duration of the disease was 14,1 ± 9,2 years. The disease activity score (DAS28) had an average of 3,15 ± 1,47.59.6% of patients used Rituximab, 23.8% Tociluzimab, 8.1% Etanercept, 5.8% Adalimumab, 0.18% Infliximab, and 0.9% Golimumab.In the group of patients with SP, the average age of the patients who had developed a new comobidity was 40,2 ± 13,7 years, men represented 63.4%, and the average of BMI was 24,3 ± 4,94.The activity of the desease, had an average Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) of 2,62 ± 1,79 and ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of 1,93 ± 1,09.Regarding the type of biologic therapy, 33.2% of patients used Etanercept, 30.1% Adalimumab, 24.9% Infliximab, 9.8% Golimumab, 1.6% Secukinumab, and 0.5% Tociluzimab.Conclusion:Our study showed a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients under biologic therapy. This can be explained by the sedentary lifestyle secondary to rheumatic disease.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sh. Erdes ◽  
T. V. Dubinina ◽  
E. M. Agafonova ◽  
D. G. Rumyantseva ◽  
S. Yu. Davidyan ◽  
...  

Objective: to evaluate the effect of golimumab (GLM) on the clinical, functional, and instrumental manifestations of coxitis in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Subjects and methods. The non-interventional prospective multicenter cohort study GO-COX conducted in the medical centers of the Russian Federation enrolled 39 patients with AS (meeting the modified New York criteria) and coxitis with BASRI-hip score 0–2, who were prescribed GLM as the first biologic agent at a dose of 50 mg per month. The patient's health status was assessed using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) before and at 6 and 12 months after GLM treatment initiation. Based on the data of radiographs (the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Hip Index (BASRI-hip) scoring system), ultrasonography (USG), and STIR and T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the investigators assessed the manifestations of coxitis. The planned follow-up duration was 2 years. This paper includes 12-month follow-up results in 22 patients.Results and discussion. At 12 weeks of GLM therapy, there were significant positive index changes: a decrease in BASDAI by an average of 3.28±1.62, in ASDAS-CRP by 2.20±0.95, in BASFI by 2.52±2.09, and in BASMI by 1.41±1.50 (p<0.0001). One year after GLM therapy initiation, the BASRI-hip values remained unchanged; 40 to 60% of patients had no MRI and USG signs of coxitis.Conclusion. At 12 weeks, GLM therapy in patients with AS and coxitis provided a reduction in the clinical and instrumental signs of coxitis, as evidenced by MRI and USG (a significant decline in the proportion of patients with subchondral bone edema and intraarticular effusion), and also effectively suppressed other manifestations of inflammatory activity.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAMAR F. BRIONEZ ◽  
SHERVIN ASSASSI ◽  
JOHN D. REVEILLE ◽  
CHARLES GREEN ◽  
THOMAS LEARCH ◽  
...  

Objective.To investigate the role of psychological variables in self-reported disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), while controlling for demographic and medical variables.Methods.Patients with AS (n = 294) meeting modified New York criteria completed psychological measures evaluating depression, resilience, active and passive coping, internality, and helplessness. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic data were also collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were completed to determine the strength of the correlation of psychological variables with disease activity, as measured by the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).Results.In the multivariate regression analysis, the psychological variables contributed significantly to the variance in BASDAI scores, adding an additional 33% to the overall R-square beyond that accounted for by demographic and medical variables (combined R-square 18%). Specifically, arthritis helplessness and depression accounted for the most significant portion of the variance in BASDAI scores in the final model.Conclusion.Arthritis helplessness and depression accounted for significant variability in self-reported disease activity beyond clinical and demographic variables in patients with AS. These findings have important clinical implications in the treatment and monitoring of disease activity in AS, and suggest potential avenues of intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document