scholarly journals Pediatric Skull Base Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usman A. Khan ◽  
Jillian H. Plonsker ◽  
Robert C. Rennert ◽  
Michael L. Levy

Management of pediatric skull base tumors requires a multi-disciplinary team that integrates advances in neuro-imaging, radiation, medical and surgical treatments, and allied therapies. Tumors of the skull base harbor complex genetic and molecular signatures that have major implications on prognosis and quality of life. Individualized management requires a strong inter-disciplinary alliance amongst practitioners, as well as a strong therapeutic alliance with the patient and family to navigate the complex decision-making process of treatments. In this chapter, we present our experience managing surgical lesions of the pediatric skull base. General considerations to tumor pathology genetics and radiobiology, diagnostic imaging, rehabilitation of cranial neuropathies and cognitive function, surgical anatomy and reconstructive options, and quality of life should be applied to each case. We also present location- and tumor-specific considerations in the anterior, middle, and posterior fossa skull base with a focus on surgical approaches and complication avoidance. Special consideration is given to syndromic tumors, particularly those from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2). Tumors can exist in multiple cranial compartments and as such some redundancy in concepts is unavoidable. Nevertheless, each patient presents with a unique clinical picture and tumor behavior. Knowledge and proficiency in skull base approaches is a necessary tool in every pediatric neurosurgeon’s armamentarium.

2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 789-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan T. Glicksman ◽  
Arjun K. Parasher ◽  
Steven G. Brooks ◽  
Alan D. Workman ◽  
Justina L. Lambert ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moran Amit ◽  
Avraham Abergel ◽  
Dan Fliss ◽  
Nevo Margalit ◽  
Ziv Gil

2003 ◽  
Vol 129 (12) ◽  
pp. 1303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziv Gil ◽  
Avraham Abergel ◽  
Sergei Spektor ◽  
Jacob T. Cohen ◽  
Avi Khafif ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Wu ◽  
Michael D. Cusimano ◽  
John M. Lee

Background Endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery (ETSS) is now considered the criterion standard approach for resection of pituitary adenomas and other midline anterior skull base lesions. Normal sinonasal structures are resected during ETSS, which raises concerns for nasal morbidity and patient-based outcome. Objective To perform a surgical outcome assessment by examining whether the extent of ETSS approaches affected patient-specific sinonasal quality of life as measured by the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22). Methods A single-center prospective cohort study of patients operated on by the same skull base team between 2012 and 2016. Patients with completed pre- and postoperative SNOT-22 were included. The primary outcome was SNOT-22 scores at preoperative, 0–1 month, 2–4 months, >5 months follow-up. Age, sex, tumor pathology, surgical procedure, and intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leak repair were also obtained. Results Of the 249 ETSS performed, 148 patients (59%) had at least one completed SNOT-22; 45 (18%) met the inclusion criteria. Sinonasal quality of life based on SNOT-22 at the 0–1-month follow-up was significantly worse than the presurgical levels (p < 0.05). However, there was a return of SNOT-22 scores to preoperative levels at 2–4 months (p > 0.05), which was sustained at >5 months (p > 0.05). Factors such as the extent of ETSS, a previous nasal surgery, repair of an intraoperative cerebral spinal fluid leak, and the tumor pathology did not affect SNOT-22 scores at any follow-up intervals (p > 0.05). Conclusion Sinonasal quality of life worsened after ETSS at 0–1 month follow-up but returned to preoperative levels at 2–4 months and remained at postoperative levels >5 months. Analysis of these data will allow us to educate our patients that the anticipated nasal morbidity after ETSS is usually only transient and should be expected to recover to preoperative levels.


2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (02) ◽  
pp. 112-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Cavel ◽  
Avraham Abergel ◽  
Nevo Margalit ◽  
Dan Fliss ◽  
Ziv Gil

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document