Background: Surgery for thoracic disc herniation and stenosis is comparatively rare and often
demanding. The goal is to achieve sufficient decompression without manipulating the spinal
cord and to minimize surgical trauma and its consequences. Individual planning and various
surgical techniques and approaches are required. The key factors for selecting the technique
are anatomical location, consistency of the pathology, general condition of the patient, and
the surgeon’s experience.
Objectives: The objective of the study was the evaluation of the technical implementation
and outcomes of a full-endoscopic uniportal technique via the extraforaminal approach in
patients with symptomatic soft or calcified disc herniation of the thoracic spine, taking specific
advantages and disadvantages and literature into consideration.
Study Design: Retrospective study
Setting: A center for spine surgery and pain medicine.
Methods: Between 2009 and 2015, decompression was performed on 26 patients with
thoracic disc herniation or stenosis with radicular or myelopathic symptoms in a full-endoscopic
uniportal technique with an extraforaminal approach. No patients underwent additional
posterior stabilization. Imaging and clinical data were collected in follow-up examinations for
18 months.
Results: Sufficient decompression was achieved in the full-endoscopic uniportal technique
in all cases. The individual selection of the respective approach made it possible to reach the
target area without manipulating the spinal cord. One patient experienced deterioration
of a myelopathy. No other serious complications were observed. All patients, except one,
experienced regression or improvement of symptoms. No evidence of increasing instability was
found in imaging.
Limitations: This is a retrospective study. The limited number of cases must be considered.
Conclusions: The full-endoscopic uniportal technique with an extraforaminal approach
was found to be a sufficient and minimally invasive method with the known advantages of
an endoscopic procedure under continuous irrigation for monosegmental disc herniations.
The inclusion criteria must be taken into consideration. If they are not met, an alternative
full-endoscopic approach (interlaminar, transthoracic retropleural) or decompression in a
conventional method must be selected. Additional stabilization does not appear to be necessary
due to the low level of trauma.
Key Words: Extraforaminal approach, thoracic disc herniation, giant disc herniation, Fullendoscopic, minimally invasive, thoracic spine